Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Exam 1 review.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Exam 1 review."— Presentation transcript:

1 exam 1 review

2 environmental decision making: benefit-cost analysis

3 how do we get those benefits?
Methods Revealed pref Stated pref Direct market price contingent valuation Indirect travel cost attribute-based models hedonic property conjoint analysis hedonic wage choice experiments avoidance expenditures contingent ranking

4

5 nature and causes of environmental problems
Nonexclusive property rights => Externalities No property rights => Open access problem Public goods

6 the market for steel

7 expect 5 results output of steel too great too much pollution produced
price of steel too low no incentives to search for ways to yield less pollution per unit steel recycling and reuse of polluting substances discouraged since release into river is so inefficiently cheap

8

9 to correct externalities
bargain (Coase) taxation (Pigou)

10 open-access fishing / grazing rights / whales vs. chickens
tragedy of the commons common-pool resources nonexclusivity (exploited by anyone) divisibility / rival (your use diminishes my use)

11 bison harvesting TB = constant price x growth
AB, MB = downward sloping because with more effort, smaller population size Efficiency is MB = MC (Q1) But no individual hunter has incentive to restrain themselves, compare their AB to MC/AC (do not say if I try harder this will make it harder for everybody else so marginal benefit will go down). Just compare their benefit and cost of hunting. (Q2) => too much effort!

12 public goods characteristics
nonexcludable (even if do not pay cannot be excluded from enjoying it) indivisible / nonrival (my enjoyment does not lessen your enjoyment) national defense / air / information / diversity free-rider problem

13

14

15 how to think about the future?
Two period model To maximize dynamic efficiency, set PV of MNB from the last unit in period 1 equal to the PVMNB from the last unit in period 2.

16 Demand: P = 8-0.4Q, MC = $2 (constant) 20 total units
Efficient allocation: Period 1: / Period 2: 9.762 P = 8-0.4(10.238) = $ – 2 = $1.9048 P = 8-0.4(9.762) = $ – 2 = $2.0952 units in period 1 / units period 2 Efficient prices? Marginal user cost?

17 definitions of sustainability
Hartwick rule (“weak sustainability”) value of the total (natural + physical) capital stock is maintained Strong sustainability value of the natural capital stock is maintained Environmental sustainability quantities of resources should be maintained (not value)


Download ppt "Exam 1 review."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google