Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

(Long-Term) Reporting Metrics: Different Points of View

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "(Long-Term) Reporting Metrics: Different Points of View"— Presentation transcript:

1 (Long-Term) Reporting Metrics: Different Points of View
Al Morton Gomathi Ramachandran Ganga Maguluri March 2010 draft-ietf-ippm-reporting-metrics-01

2 Different Points of View (POV): 2 key ones
When designing IP measurements and reporting results, MUST know the Audience to be relevant Key question: “How will the results be used?” Network Characterization: Monitoring (QA) Trouble-shooting Modeling SLA (or verification) Application Performance Estimation: Metrics Facilitate process Transfer-dependent aspects Modify App Design How can I _______ my network? What happened to my stream? SRC DST

3 Versions 06 and 07 Status Last Comments from Steve Konish (2008)
Section 4 reorganized New sub-sections to help with this. Clarified the meaning of processing "forks" Section 6 (Focus on Reporting) now: Summarizes results for each metric, loss, delay delay var. Discusses Long-Term Reporting Advantages of Short term collection to support Long term reporting

4 Summary of Recommendations so far:
Set a LONG Loss threshold Distinguish between Long Finite Delay and Loss Avoid truncated distributions Delay of Lost Packets is UNDEFINED Maintain orthogonality – avoid double-counting defects Use conditional distributions and compute statistics Report BOTH Loss and Delay Report BOTH the Sample Mean and Median. Comparison of the Mean and Median is informative Means may be combined over time and space (when applicable) Means come with a weighting function for each sample if needed, the sample Size, and Loss simply reduces the sample size Means are more Robust to a single wonky measurement when the sample size is Large Move the Industry Away from “Average Jitter” Use the 99.9%-ile minus minimum PDV Portray this as a Delay Variation “Pseudo-Range”

5 New Material on Capacity
Identify two categories of Capacity-related Measurements Raw Capacity, metrics in RFC 5136 Restricted Capacity, as in BTC Framework RFC 3148 All new material is on Raw Capacity at present Look at the options available in terms of parameters for capacity metrics and methods of measurement What choices seem best for Network Char? For Application Design? Type-P, for all metrics Capacity - Theoretical Max differs from the metric Utilization – Time scale of averaging conceals vari. Available Capacity – Many methods of Estimation Variability, for all metrics …

6 New Material on Capacity
Variability, for all metrics, continued … Two Discussion Questions: What ways can Utilization be measured and summarized to describe the potential variability in a useful way? How can the variability in Available Capacity estimates be reported, so that the confidence in the results is also conveyed?

7 What’s Next? Finish the WG draft on Short-term reporting?
Nothing in this draft precludes people from assigning infinite delay to lost packets – this may serve some 3rd POV Al thinks this point resolves much of the controversy about what this draft recommends! Need Additional IPPM people to Volunteer to read the draft (some already have) Suggest section reordering, if still wanted? Discuss the Capacity related Questions now, in the halls, and on the list.


Download ppt "(Long-Term) Reporting Metrics: Different Points of View"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google