Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP"— Presentation transcript:

1 Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP
Development and Application of a Regional DTA model for the Twin Cities Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP

2 Presentation Outline Need and Motivation for a DTA model
Regional Modeling Background DTA Model Development Model Calibration Application ABM to DTA development Lessons Learned

3 Need and Motivation Several Major Re-Construction Projects in the region anticipated within the next few years. I35W/Lake Street TH169 I94 I35W River Bridge

4 Need and Motivation With so many major construction projects being done during the same time period, it is not obvious what the traffic impacts will be Therefore, a model that can estimate traffic flow changes over the entire system is needed to evaluate impacts and select the optimum construction phasing.

5 Regional Modeling Background
Traditional 4-step trip-based model covers 20-county area 1,601 zones 25,000 links 11,200 nodes Activity-based model covers 19-county area 3,030 zones 55,800 links 23,800 nodes

6 DTA Model Development Preparation of Demand Matrices
Synthetic Matrix Estimation adjustments done in regional model Vehicle Classes: SOV, HOV, Truck Hourly to 15 min demand conversion Custom Java program to convert CUBE matrix to DynusT input format Preparation of Network Import planning network to DynusT format Deletion of centroid connectors and designation of access/egress nodes Network checking and manual corrections

7 DTA Model Development Simplified approach to toll modeling for 4-step model Allow toll-eligible trips Prohibitive tolls for SOVs and Trucks Signal Timing Initial unconstrained assignment was conducted DynuStudio tool was used to calculate default signal timing parameters Full DTA model run, with feedback, was then run to convergence

8 Model Calibration: Observed Data
MnDOT detector data – 15 minute counts Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday for October 2014 Speed Data TomTom data for arterials -- average speed over a 2-hour time period Detector data in 15 min intervals on freeways

9 Model Calibration: Flow Model Calibration

10 Model Calibration: Fit to Counts

11 Link Average Speeds -- Freeways

12 Link Average Speeds -- Arterials

13 Model Calibration: Before and After Randomized Departure Times
Initial Departure Profile Final Departure Profile

14 Model Application Construction Impacts Planning Analysis
I35W/Lake Street – 4 construction alternatives with 2 phases TH169 – Bridge closure impacts, subarea analysis to local roads I94 – Impacts with and without TH169 closure Planning Analysis Impact of proposed Managed Lane flows at termini

15 Model Application -- Reporting
Flow Difference Plots MOE’s: Vehicle Delay by range of delay/vehicle Vehicle-Hours Vehicle-Miles Selected Link statistics: Average trip length Ramp to Ramp flows for simulation input Change in demand on parallel routes

16 Road User Cost Assumptions
Type of Vehicle User Cost per Hour User Cost per Mile Passenger vehicle $16.00 $0.31 Commercial vehicle $27.30 $0.96 Region* $16.74 $0.35 Road User Costs by Scenario Scenario Daily User Cost Days of Construction Total User Cost 1. YR 1: One lane closed,bridge open YR 2: One lane closed, Bridge open, construction on I-35W and I-94 YR 1: $195,500 YR 2: $450,200 335 215 550 $65,492,500 $96,763,000 162,285,500 2. One lane closed, bridge closed $382,000 $127,970,000 3. Directional closures $342,500 $188,375,000 RUC Assumptions are Taken from benefit/Cost Analysis Process. RUCs are balanced against Construction Costs, which is the case of US 169, I significant cost savings was achieved by not maintaining bridge access during construction.

17 Model Application: Heat Maps to Identify Queues
US 10/US 61 On Ramp Mounds/Kellogg Blvd Off Ramp 6th St/US 52 S Off Ramp Mounds/Kellogg Blvd On Ramp US 52 On Ramp 94W to 35E Ramp E 12th St Off Ramp E 12th St On Ramp 35E to 94 W Ramp Commons Marion St. Off Ramp W Kellogg Blvd On Ramp Dale St. Off Ramp AM PM

18 Model Application: Speed Profile by Time

19 ABM to DTA – Demand Data Twin Cities ABM Model will be used on most, if not all new planning analysis Trip Records instead of trip tables – allows for more detailed time stratification Cube Application developed to convert ABM to DynusT format trip records Class stratification – SOV, HOV, Truck – others for VOT stratification?

20 ABM-compatible Network
Used True Shape network Detailed network editing and error correction – node orientation Used parcel-level data to identify access nodes and shares by zone Implement Managed Lane Algorithm for tolling Intersection control coding, aided by initial assignment

21 Lessons Learned Subarea vs. Regional model application
Use of DTA travel times to inform mode share Extracting ramp to ramp movements and other details of mining the results Considerable time to clean networks in DTA ABM-type detailed, discrete demand is more compatible with DTA

22 Potential for Future Applications
Independent estimate for dynamically-tolled lanes Operational analysis -- queuing “Real Time” construction management Feedback to ABM: times and demand? Input to simulation

23 Contact(s) Steve Ruegg ,PE Senior Technical Principal
Systems Analysis Group

24 QUESTIONS?


Download ppt "Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google