Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Figure 1 The amount of recalled words (%) from List 1 and List 2, after the 2-hour delay in the wake (in the left) and the sleep groups (in the right),

Published byShanon Cook Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Figure 1 The amount of recalled words (%) from List 1 and List 2, after the 2-hour delay in the wake (in the left) and the sleep groups (in the right),"— Presentation transcript:

1 Figure 1 The amount of recalled words (%) from List 1 and List 2, after the 2-hour delay in the wake (in the left) and the sleep groups (in the right), and within these groups in the remember (dark gray bars) and forget subgroups (light gray bars). Significant interaction between the recall of the two lists and the instructions (forget or remember) indicates the directed forgetting effect after a 2-hour delay in both groups (sleep and wake). The effect is mainly driven by the benefit of directed forgetting—better recall for List 2 in the forget than in the remember subgroup—within the sleep group. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Asterisks represent significance (p) of independent samples t tests: **p < .001. From: The Benefit of Directed Forgetting Persists After a Daytime Nap: The Role of Spindles and Rapid Eye Movement Sleep in the Consolidation of Relevant Memories Sleep. 2016;40(3). doi: /sleep/zsw076 Sleep | © Sleep Research Society Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Sleep Research Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

2 Figure 2 The amount of recalled words (%) from List 1 and List 2 within the sleep group, of those participants who reached both NREM and REM phase (With REM group), and of those who only slept in NREM state (Without REM group). Dark gray bars represent the performance of the remember subgroup and light gray bars the performance of the forget subgroup, within each groups. Significant three-way interaction between the recall of the two lists (List 1 and List 2), the instruction (forget or remember), and REM phase (with REM or without REM) emerged. As visualized, the directed forgetting effect was mainly due to the benefit of directed forgetting—better recall for List 2 in the forget than in the remember subgroup—within the with REM group only. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Asterisks represent significance (p) of independent samples t tests: **p < NREM = non-rapid eye movement; REM = rapid eye movement. From: The Benefit of Directed Forgetting Persists After a Daytime Nap: The Role of Spindles and Rapid Eye Movement Sleep in the Consolidation of Relevant Memories Sleep. 2016;40(3). doi: /sleep/zsw076 Sleep | © Sleep Research Society Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Sleep Research Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

3 Figure 3 The association between the number of recalled words from List 1 and REM duration (min) within the remember group (on the left), and the association between the number of recalled words from List 2 and REM duration (min) within the forget subgroup (on the right). p values indicate significance values before FDR correction. FDR = false discovery rate; REM = rapid eye movement. From: The Benefit of Directed Forgetting Persists After a Daytime Nap: The Role of Spindles and Rapid Eye Movement Sleep in the Consolidation of Relevant Memories Sleep. 2016;40(3). doi: /sleep/zsw076 Sleep | © Sleep Research Society Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Sleep Research Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

4 Figure 4 The relationship between number of recalled words from List 1 (on the left) and List 2 (on the right) and fast spindle maximum amplitude on two prominent electrodes, within the forget subgroup. p values indicate significance values before FDR correction. FDR = false discovery rate. From: The Benefit of Directed Forgetting Persists After a Daytime Nap: The Role of Spindles and Rapid Eye Movement Sleep in the Consolidation of Relevant Memories Sleep. 2016;40(3). doi: /sleep/zsw076 Sleep | © Sleep Research Society Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Sleep Research Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

Download ppt "Figure 1 The amount of recalled words (%) from List 1 and List 2, after the 2-hour delay in the wake (in the left) and the sleep groups (in the right),"

Similar presentations

From: An open day in the metric space

From: An open day in the metric space
Fig. 1 The non-genomic effects of E2 on aggressive behavior are seasonally variable in songbirds and mice. Bar graphs (mean ± SEM) representing.

Fig. 1 The non-genomic effects of E2 on aggressive behavior are seasonally variable in songbirds and mice. Bar graphs (mean ± SEM) representing.
Fig. 3. Plot of overall survival by adjuvant therapy for patient subgroups. (A) Patients with M0 disease (n = 411). (B) Patients receiving 36 Gy craniospinal.

Fig. 3. Plot of overall survival by adjuvant therapy for patient subgroups. (A) Patients with M0 disease (n = 411). (B) Patients receiving 36 Gy craniospinal.
Figure 1. Heat Map Summarizing Question Types by Agency

Figure 1. Heat Map Summarizing Question Types by Agency
From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*

From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*
Figure 1. Estimated marginal mean (+/− SE) QSU-B factor 1 craving scores for the three-way interaction of Quitting Intention by Expect by Administered.

Figure 1. Estimated marginal mean (+/− SE) QSU-B factor 1 craving scores for the three-way interaction of Quitting Intention by Expect by Administered.
Figure 2— Cntnap2 knockout (KO) rats exhibit seizures

Figure 2— Cntnap2 knockout (KO) rats exhibit seizures
From: The World Price of Credit Risk

From: The World Price of Credit Risk
Figure 1. Flow diagram of participants recruited into the study.

Figure 1. Flow diagram of participants recruited into the study.
Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.

Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.
From: Political Leadership and Power Redistribution

From: Political Leadership and Power Redistribution
Figure 1. The Modified Dual Pathway Model.

Figure 1. The Modified Dual Pathway Model.
Figure 1. Typical cursor trajectory of users with CP with poorly developed fine motor control during a pointing task. From: A Novel Head Cursor Facilitation.

Figure 1. Typical cursor trajectory of users with CP with poorly developed fine motor control during a pointing task. From: A Novel Head Cursor Facilitation.
Figure 1. Structural Equation Model: Effects of Valence Framing on Perceived Truth of Statements and Source Trustworthiness. Standardized path-coefficients.

Figure 1. Structural Equation Model: Effects of Valence Framing on Perceived Truth of Statements and Source Trustworthiness. Standardized path-coefficients.
Test characteristics of MRI-detected inflammation for the development of arthritis in CSA patients (A) and RA in UA patients (B) during 1-year follow-up.

Test characteristics of MRI-detected inflammation for the development of arthritis in CSA patients (A) and RA in UA patients (B) during 1-year follow-up.
Table 5 Village Characteristics Based on the Census of India 1991, by Mandate during which a First SHG was Created in the Village From: Public Good Provision.

Table 5 Village Characteristics Based on the Census of India 1991, by Mandate during which a First SHG was Created in the Village From: Public Good Provision.
Figure 3. Average response time by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), group, and condition. Error bars represent standard error. Response time was measured as.

Figure 3. Average response time by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), group, and condition. Error bars represent standard error. Response time was measured as.
Figure 1. Mean recalled time (days) since the start of the last quit attempt by use of stop-smoking medications (SSM) and Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI)

Figure 1. Mean recalled time (days) since the start of the last quit attempt by use of stop-smoking medications (SSM) and Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI)
Error bars represent the mean (s.e.).

Error bars represent the mean (s.e.).
Figure 1. Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) isolates by method of initial detection and STEC serotype, Connecticut, 2000–2009. From: Ten-Year.

Figure 1. Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) isolates by method of initial detection and STEC serotype, Connecticut, 2000–2009. From: Ten-Year.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google