1. Oregon Transportation Plan
Introduction
“Report Card”
Governor’s Transportation Vision Panel Jerri Bohard, Transportation Development Division Administrator February 23, 2015

2. Goal 12: Transportation Planning Rule
ORS
Oregon Statute that requires the Oregon Transportation Commission to prepare a comprehensive long-range transportation system plan
ORS
Oregon Statute that requires ODOT and other units of state and local government carry out their programs in compliance with the statewide land use planning goals
ODOT Transportation Plans
Oregon Transportation Plan
Overall Policy Plan
Mode and Topic Plans
Aviation, Bicycle and Pedestrian, Freight, Highway, Public Transportation, Rail, Transportation Options, Safety
Facility Plans
Corridor Plans, Interchange Area Management Plans, etc.
Goal 12: Transportation Planning Rule
The Oregon Administration Rule that defines State and Local Governments transportation planning requirements for complying with Goal 12
MPO Regional Transportation System Plans (RTSPs)
Public Involvement = Support for Decision Making
County and City Transportation System Plans (TSPs)
Project Review, Selection, and Programming
STIP
ODOT’s State Transportation Improvement Program
Local Capital Improvement Program
Solution Delivery
Project Plans, Development/Construction, Operations, Maintenance

3. Elements of Implementation
Coordination with MPOs, local governments
Legislative Action both state and federal
Coordination with other state and federal agencies
Planning Structure – earlier diagram, while there are consistency requirements between state planning goals etc all plans are not updated simultaneously and certain aspects are of more interest then others
Modes of transportation besides state highways are predominately at the local and regional level
Legislative action is required for enacting new funding both investment, methods and modes
Multimodal connectivity is the work that we are doing on Intermodal Oregon
Coordination with other agencies – advance technology, coordination of services with Human Services can increase opportunites
Comprehensive Planning structure
ODOT’s role in multimodal connectivity

4. Challenges to Implementation
Authority and Responsibility
Timelines
Legislative Budgetary Authority
Authority and Responsibility is disbursed among many, both modes and agencies
Revenue comes from other places – local funds, FTA, etc and so decentralized and priorities may differ
This is a 30 year plan, and also aspects may need to be phased, in other words some short term actions before implementing long term actions.
NEED to provide examples from the report cardh
Legislative provides funding and budget for implementation
Revenue Support
Financial Stability

5. Oregon Transportation Plan
IMPLEMENTATION WORK PROGRAM
SHORT TERM
MID-TERM
LONG TERM

6. OTP Investment Scenarios (2004 Dollars)
$4.0
Average Annual Needs
$3.5
$3.0
Level 3
$3.5 billion
(Feasible Needs)
Investment Scenario Level 3
Annual average feasible needs derived from OTP Needs Analysis (With inflation this feasible needs total will grow over the plan period. See Figure 8)
Investment Scenario Level 2
Additional funding to keep pace with inflation - maintain purchasing
power of Level 1 at 2004 levels
(See Figure 8 for Level 2 funding needs over the plan period.)
$1.0
Level 1
$2.2 Billion
(Current 2004 Spending)
$0.5
Investment Scenario Level 1
Current 2004 spending derived from OTP Needs Analysis (Purchasing power declines 40 to 50 percent over the plan period due to inflation)
$ 0.0
$2.5
$2.0
$1.5

7. Oregon Transportation Plan
KEY INITIATIVES
POLICIES
STRATEGIES

8. QUESTIONS