1. penulisan artikel untuk jurnal international (Social science)
F. Defung
Pelatihan Penulisan Jurnal Ilmiah
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM)
Universitas Mulawarman
Hotel Grand Victoria, Samarinda, 12 Desember 2017

2. JOURNAL vs ARTICLE. The different is ….?
Manuscript ?
Scholarly articles (artikel ilmiah)

3. Publishers DO want quality !!!!
Wanted
Originality
Significant advances in field
Appropriate methods, case studies and conclusions
Readability
Studies that meet ethical standards
Not wanted
Duplications
Reports of no scientific interest
Work out of date
Inappropriate/incomplete methods or conclusions
Studies with insufficient data

4. Beberapa indexing:
1. ISI Knowledge -Thomson Reuter (USA ) 2. SCOPUS (Netherland),  3. Microsoft Academic Search,  4. Ulrich’sPeriodicals Directory (Proquest) 5. Academic Search Complete (EBSCO) 6. Zentralblatt MATH ( Springer – Verlag) 7. DOAJ (Lund University Swedia) 8. Peridoque (EP Lausanne Switzerland
9. SHERPA/RoMEO (Nottingham University, UK) 10. Index Copernicus(Poland) 11. Google Scholar

5. Type of the manuscripts to write and publish
Full articles (Research articles / Original Papers)
Report substantial and original scientific results. Generally: between 6 and 12 journal pages, have appropriate figures and/or tables, an abstract of 100–200 words. 
Letters/rapid communications/short communications
Usually published for the quick and early communication of significant and original advances. They are much shorter than full articles (usually strictly limited in size, depending on each journal).
Review papers or perspectives
Summarize recent developments on a specific hot topic, highlighting important points that have previously been reported and introduce no new information. Normally they are submitted on invitation by the editor of the journal.

6. Another Type of Manuscripts
                 
Book Reviews
a "critique" of a book and are not primarily a summary. They contain fewer than words and start with "Book review on:"
Conference proceeding and/or abstracts
provide short summaries of in-progress or completed primary studies that are presented at conferences, but are not yet fully peer-reviewed for publication as complete articles
Comments & replies
Special issue editorial
Invited perspective articles
Technical/Methodologies notes

7. Before submit : Read journal requirements in the Guide for Authors.
detailed editorial guidelines,
submission procedures,
fees for publishing,
Copyright,
ethical guidelines.

9. General structure of a full article
Initial information (mainly for indexing and searching)
Title
Authors
Abstract
Keywords
Main Text
Introduction
Background
Literature review
Method
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
Closing
Acknowledgment
References
Supplementary material

10. General guidelines: Title: Short and informative
Abstract: 1 paragraph (<250 words)
Introduction and Background: pages
Literature Review: 1 – 2 pages
Methods: 2-3 pages
Results: 6-8 pages
Discussion: 4-6 pages
Conclusion: 1-2 paragraph
Figures: 6-8 (one per page)
Tables: 1-3 (one per page)
References: papers (2-4 pages)

11. A. The title, abstract, and keywords:
Why it is important to get them right ?
Enable the dissemination of your research.
Most electronic search engines, databases, or journal websites will use the words found in your title and abstract.
2. The title and abstract are often the only parts of a paper that are freely available online
3. The abstract is the first section of your paper that journal editors and reviewers read

12. Title Page Title Author Names and Affiliation Keywords
Condenses the paper’s content in a few words (max 15 words)
Represent the topic in the paper
Don’t’ start with numeric and avoid abbreviations
Author Names and Affiliation
No academic title
Present the author affiliation
Provide full postal address and communication channel
Keywords
Present most frequent core terminology in the paper
JEL (Journal of Economic Literature)

13. Hal-hal yang perlu diperhatikan
Jenis huruf yang dipergunakan dan ukuran (size).
References: APA style, Chicago style, Harvard style, etc.
Abstract dan full paper template dari setiap jurnal/publisher

14. Abstract (Kondisi Ideal)
Background
Purpose
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Keywords

15. Contoh Abstract (Kuantitatif)

16. Contoh Abstract (Kualitatif)
Abstract— According to Ministry of Internal Affairs Regulation [1], there are two sets of performance measurements data which apply to public hospitals as Local General Services Bodies (Badan Layanan Umum Daerah/BLUD): financial data and non-financial data on performance measurements. As public hospitals, public hospitals are owned by different levels of government that provide different levels of funding for the services offered by each hospital. There are differences in the scope of services due to the class of each hospital and each hospital’s strategic management. However, each public hospital has the ability and creativity to maintain quality in services and activities based on their own strategic management and governance as a Local General Services Body. The aim of this study is to understand the cycle of data collecting and reporting processes on performance measurement data in public hospitals. A qualitative approach and a multiple case study design are used to enable the exploration of the data gathering practices and processes on performance measurement data of the four public hospitals. Results show the four public hospitals use financial data (such as revenue growth, cost trends and financial statements), and non-financial data (such as administrative and clinical performance), to measure their performance. The four public hospitals in this study face similar difficulties in the collecting of financial data, such as in relation to the preparation of financial statements. On the other hand, each of the four public hospitals has well-developed abilities to processes non- financial data, such as coverage of health services, epidemic infectious diseases and the maternal mortality rate, in decision-making processes. Keywords— information, system, performance, measurement, data, hospitals.

17. Test your title and abstract
Google Scholar can help test your title and abstract.
Nothing shows up ? … GOOD !!, but ?? …
Many shows up ? ….. BAD !!, but ??

18. B. Abstract Generally between 100 and 250 words in length
It should help the reader decide “whether there is something in the body of the paper worth reading”
Types of Abstract ?
Descriptive abstracts, usually used in the social sciences and humanities, do not give specific information about methods and results. (Just a sentence or two)
Informative abstracts present information on the background, aim, methods, results, and conclusions
Structured abstracts are essentially informative abstracts divided into a series of headings (e.g., Objective, Method, Results, Conclusion) and are typically found in medical literature and clinical trial reports.

19. Informative abstract
Background: A simple opening sentence or two placing the work in context. • Aims: One or two sentences giving the purpose of the work. • Method(s): One or two sentences explaining what was done. • Results: One or two sentences indicating the main findings. • Conclusions: One sentence giving the most important consequence of the work.

20. Check the final abstract
Contains information that is consistent with that presented in the paper.
Meets the guidelines of the targeted journal (word limit, type of abstract, etc.)
Typographical errors-free. As these may lead referees and editors to says :
“conclude that the paper is bad and should be rejected”

21. C. Introduction
“Introduction” is the way/space to convince readers that you clearly know your work is useful.
A good introduction should answer the following questions:
What was I studying?
Why was this topic important to investigate?
What did we know about this topic before I did this study?
How will this study advance new knowledge or new ways of understanding?

22. What do editors expect from an introduction of research paper?:
Provide a perspective that consistent with the nature of the journal
Introduce the main scientific publications on which your work is based, citing a couple of original and important works, including recent review articles.
Do not do ‘improper citations’ of too many references that irrelevant to the research topic,
Do not do inappropriate judgments on your own achievements

24. tips for the introduction:
Never use more words than necessary (be concise and to-the-point). Don't make this section into a history lesson. Long introductions put readers off.
Give the whole picture at first! We all know that you are keen to present your new data. But ?.
The introduction must be organized from the global to the particular point of view, guiding the readers to your objectives when writing this paper.
Always keep them separate to ensure that the manuscript flows logically from one section to the next. State the purpose of the paper and research strategy adopted to answer the question, but do not mix introduction with results, discussion and conclusion.
Expressions such as "novel," "first time," "first ever," and "paradigm-changing" are not preferred. Use them sparingly (se-hemat mungkin)

25. Literature review
Review of literature is one of the most important steps in the research process
A literature review is more than the search for information, and goes beyond being a descriptive annotated bibliography. All works included in the review must be read, evaluated and analyzed (which you would do for an annotated bibliography), but relationships between the literature must also be identified and articulated, in relation to your field of research.
Annotated bibliography is a list of citations to books, articles, and documents. Each citation is followed by a brief, descriptive and evaluative paragraph. The purpose of the annotation is to inform the reader of the relevance, accuracy, and quality of the sources cited.

26. The purposes of the review are:
familiarize the reader with relevant literature and research in an area of study
demonstrate relationships among the prior research
inform the reader what has already been discovered to avoid duplication
identify gaps and discrepancies in the literature
define and limit the problem you are working on
place your study in a historical perspective
avoid unnecessary duplication
evaluate promising research methods
relate your findings to previous knowledge and suggest further research

27. Various sub-title (name) for literature review
Review of literature
Past studies review
Existing studies
Prior literature
A Critical Review of Related Studies
Etc…

30. Methods
The methods section of a research paper provides the information by which a study’s validity is judged.

31. The methodology section can be generally divided into several specific parts
1. Define the population and the methods of sampling 2. Describe the instrumentation 3. Describe the procedures and if relevant, the time frame 4. Describe the analysis plan 5. Describe any approaches to ensure validity and reliability 6. State any assumptions 7. Describe the scope and limitations of the methodology

32. Result or Findings What have you found?
Present only representative results, numbers or facts determined from the analysis
Effective ways to present results : Tables, charts, graph
If using a hypothesis: accept or reject the hypothesis
Use proper sub-heading to classifies the results to make it easier to read/review.

33. Discussion This is the section to discuss the results
DO NOT reiterate the results
Compare your result to previous (published) results.
DO NOT hide if your result is not inline with common .
Example:
The finding is inline with Alex (1990), How ever it is contradict with Ana (2005).

34. Conclusion Conclude your paper with the proper results finding.
Do not repeat the abstract
what can be done in future research.
Policy implication.

35. Appearances count !! Teknik Ilustrasi
“A figure is worth a thousand worth”
Figures, tables and graphs are often used in scientific reports.
They are valuable because they can be used to present complex results in a readable way, but it is important that they are used carefully.
Check requirements in the guideline !! (number, size, etc)

36. Tables or figures? Tables: Graphs:
Table usually used to present the actual, experimental, and regression results
Requires precise values
Values involve multiple units of measure
Is used to look up or compare individual values
Graphs:
Is used to communicate a message that is contained in the shape of the data
Is used to reveal relationship among many values
Is used for comparison

37. Same data presents in table and graph, It depends on the purpose

38. Never include vertical line in a table
Position of units (above)
Decimal separators (use dot, not commas
Table number and title

40. Deal with the Reviewers
DON’T be frustrated when the reviewers questioning many things in the papers
“as long as the reviewers still want you to revise it means there is a hope”
Answer all the questions with gracefully
Deal with all the questions, do not leave a question without answer.

41. “To get to know, to discover, to publish-this the destiny of a scientist “
(François Arago)
Thank you