1. How to interpret collected data?
Seminar #5
© Zaytsev D.G.

2. Research goal
To identify the models of protest publics’ participation in processes of socio-political change in different countries and regions of the world (North and South America, North Africa and Middle East, Asia)
© Zaytsev D.G., Ullanov A.A.

3. Book: structure & main authors
INTRODUCTION PART I. Theoretical and methodological issues to study protests PART II. Social Movements as the prerequisites and outcomes of Public Uprisings of 2010s PART III. “Protest Publics”: An Emergent Actor of Socio-Political Change PART IV. Models of Protest Publics' Impact on Socio-Political Changes CONCLUSION
© Zaytsev D.G., Ullanov A.A.

4. Assumptions (1-3)
A0: Protests of 2010s ≠ Social Movements A1: Social Movements are preconditions and possible outcomes of the protest publics that emerged in the 2010s A2: Protests of 2010s = Publics, the New Emerging Actor of Change A3: Protest Publics participate in socio-political change in different models
SEMINAR #1, Research Design. Part 1. BOOK, part II
SEMINAR # Research Design. Part 2. BOOK, part III
SEMINAR # Research Design. Part 3. BOOK, part IV
© Zaytsev D.G., Ullanov A.A.

5. Conceptualization (2)
© Anufriev A., Zaytsev D. G. “Protest Publics” in Egypt and Turkey from 2011 Till Present Days: Assessment of Impact on Political Changes // Comparative Politics (Russia) Vol. 7. No. 2(23). P

6. Brazil: structure of the paper
Protests in Brazil: Overview
Factors of Political Changes in Brazil
Economic factors: from “crisis of hopes” to economic recession
Socio-cultural factors: lack of conventional social channels for self- expression
Political factors: deepening “legitimacy crisis” and request for participatory democracy
Brazilian Protests as “public assemblies” around “troubled message”
Protestors’ Demands in : Participatory Democracy as a Unifying Identity?
Political changes in Brazil : from change in policy and politics to “punctuated” institutional changes
Government’s reply: co-opting or splitting the protestors?
Conclusion: from oversight to direct participation in democracy
© Zaytsev D.G.

7. Economic factors: from “crisis of hopes” to economic recession
© Zaytsev D.G.

8. Economic factors: from “crisis of hopes” to economic recession
© Zaytsev D.G.

9. Economic factors: from “crisis of hopes” to economic recession
© Zaytsev D.G.

10. Economic factors: from “crisis of hopes” to economic recession
Country Code
BRA
Indicator Name
Investment in transport with private participation (current US$)
Government expenditure on education as % of GDP (%)
Health expenditure, total (% of GDP)
GINI index (World Bank estimate)
2000
3,93814 7,
2001
3,84304 7,
59,33
2002
3,74435 7,
58,62
2003 6,
58,01
2004
3,97255 7,
56,88
2005
4,47671 8,
56,64
2006
4,86989 8,
55,93
2007
4,97835 8,
55,23
2008
5,2727 8,
54,37
2009
5,47154 8,
53,87
2010
5,64737 8,
2011
5,73953 8,
53,1
2012
5,91432 8,
52,67
2013 8,
52,87
2014 8,
© Zaytsev D.G.

11. Protestors’ Demands in 2013-2016: Participatory Democracy as a Unifying Identity?
© Zaytsev D.G.

12. POLICY CHANGE: transport, education, anti-corruption
Political changes in Brazil : from change in policy and politics to “punctuated” institutional changes
POLICY CHANGE: transport, education, anti-corruption
SITUTIONAL CHANGE: Dilma support ranking fail, impeachment
INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE: decline of democracy?
TABLE 4
TABLE 8
© Zaytsev D.G.

13. Government’s reply: co-opting or splitting the protestors?
Political crisis and elite split
General political consensus: democratic development vs authoritarian modernization
TABLE 8
TABLE 9
© Zaytsev D.G.