Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Organoclay Cap Performance

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Organoclay Cap Performance"— Presentation transcript:

1 Organoclay Cap Performance

2 Methods Hexane Extractible Material (EPA 9071B)
Surrogate for oil content (85 ± 5% of NAPL extractible) Extractible portions with no NAPL Sediments (<1%) Sands (negligible) Organophylic clays PM-199 (1.25±0.77%) ET-1 (3.5±0.81%) Organic matter (OM)/carbon (OC) content Indicator of organophylic component content of clays PM-199 (34.67 ± 0.22%) OM ET-1 (24.13 ± 0.51%) OM Ranges shown are estimated 95% confidence limits

3 Hexane Extractible Material
Fresh Samples 2.1% ± 1.2% Field samples 2006 ET % Significant oil capacity remaining correlation with water content 0.76 ±0.46 g/g dry OC 0.61±0.25 g/g dry OC excluding two outliers 2008 ET % 2009 samples ET % Conclusions Significant NAPL capacity remaining HEM not a sensitive indicator (but can indicate high NAPL %) Field ET-1 samples exhibit higher and more variable HEM than fresh samples (not seen in PM-199- field and mat samples avg. 1.25%)

4 Profiles - 2009 WC-01 Intermixing at top HEM normal variations WC-02
HEM slightly elevated Possible lateral NAPL movement?

5 Organic Matter Fresh Samples 2008 Field Samples 2009 Field Samples
ET ±0.16% PM ±0.07% 2008 Field Samples ET ±2.6% (~ half-life 6.7 years) PM ±0.37% (~half-life of >30 years) 2009 Field Samples ET ±1.7 (~half-life of 8.7 years) Ranges shown are measured standard deviations

6 Conclusions HEM Organic matter Recommendation
Not a sensitive indicator of NAPL Will indicate significant NAPL contamination (>10%) No evidence of NAPL contamination at that level Organic matter ET-1 more variable and showing potential degradation Half-life of years Alternative- rapid reduction initially, more stable now Recommendation Continue organic matter monitoring (extend interval)


Download ppt "Organoclay Cap Performance"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google