1. WFD-Data model WasserBLIcK concept  COM approach
W. Kappler, ahu AG
Workshop: Experience with "WasserBLIcK" and interesting aspects in the context of WISE
Brussels, February 2005
p:/lawait/multimed/present/workshopbrussels050216_wk.ppt
s:\AK\AK-nachweise\ahu_info_folien.ppt

2. schedule data specifications in context of WFD - German perspective1 2
2000
WFD
data requirements
2005
Reporting guidance
Reporting sheets -> new requirements
diff?
2002
GIS Guidance v1
specification of data demands
2005
GIS Guidance v2
Revised specifications
diff?
2003
WasserBLIcK templates v1
Implement. of the GIS-Guidance specs.
2005
WasserBLIcK templates v2
Revised implementation
2004
Template filling v1
data collection and dissemination
2005
Template filling v2
Revised collection and reporting
2005
Reporting Art. V
data freezing
p:/lawait/multimed/present/workshopbrussels050216_wk.ppt
s:\AK\AK-nachweise\ahu_info_folien.ppt

3. Process of template development
requirements
GIS-Guidance v1
requirements
administrative
requirements
technical / (eco)logical
requirements
developing
additional templates
for emissions and impacts
(e.g. point sources)
WFD-codelist for reporting entities
(water bodies, areas etc)
GIS-Guidance
conformal
templates
products
p:/lawait/multimed/present/workshopbrussels050216_wk.ppt
s:\AK\AK-nachweise\ahu_info_folien.ppt

4. why do we need co-ordinated, reliable data specifications?
WFD specifications affect all different working levels
EU-COM
different RBD, WA, countries, local authorities and actors
RBD
basis for a quasi-standard in water management (object catalogue/model, codes etc.)
Working areas
far-ranging effects on data management in all water managing institutions
countries, local authorities & actors
not only a reporting convention, but basis for investments
p:/lawait/multimed/present/workshopbrussels050216_wk.ppt

5. comparison aspects: WB templates  COM sheets
topics - content (SW, GW, Pressures, Impacts, Protected Areas etc.)
attribute data - content
codes, domains (list of attribut values)
geometric feature classes (point, line, polygon)
granularity / resolution (river segment < river water body < river)
p:/lawait/multimed/present/workshopbrussels050216_wk.ppt
s:\AK\AK-nachweise\ahu_info_folien.ppt

6. List of Reporting sheets  WasserBLIcK templates
WasserBLIcK templates (geometry)
SWB 1-4 (charact., typol.)
SWPI 2 (SWB at risk)
SWPI 7 (impact)
RiverSegment (l)
LakeSegment (a)
TransitionalWaters (a)
CoastalWaters (a)
GWB 1 (charact. GWB)
GWPI 2 (GWB at risk)
GroundwaterBody (a)
SWPI 3 (point sources)
SurfaceWaterEmission (p) ++GG
ChemicalParameters (d) ++GG
SWPI 4 (diffuse sources)
GWPI 3 (diffuse sources)
DiffuseEmissionArea (a) ++GG
ChemicalParaDiffuse (d) ++GG
SWPI 5 (abstractions)
GWPI 5-6 (abstraction & recharge)
WaterLevelAlteration (p) ++GG
SWPI 6 (regulation & morphology)
MorphologicalImpact (p) ++GG
RPA 1 (Protected Areas)
PA Bird (a), PA Drinking (a,p), PA Economic Species (l, a), PA Habitat (a), PA Nutrient (l), PA Recreational (p,a)
Legend
Charact. SW  GW
Pressures/impact SW  GW
Protected Areas
(p)
Point
(l)
Line
(a)
Area/Polygon
(d)
Data
++GG
Additional compared to GIS-Guidance
p:/lawait/multimed/present/workshopbrussels050216_wk.ppt
s:\AK\AK-nachweise\ahu_info_folien.ppt

7. missing counterparts Reporting sheets WasserBLIcK-templates
GWPI 4, 7 (point sources, saltwater intrusions)
No template (no need in Germany?)
SWPI 1, 8, 9 (summary, gaps, recommand.)
GWPI 1, 8, 9,10,11 (summary, impact, further characterisation, gaps, recommand.)
ECON 1 (economic analysis)
CONC 1 (conclusions)
No templates (only summary text)
No sheets (only “mapping geodata”)
CompetentAuthority
RiverBasin
WorkingArea
No sheets??
GroundwaterMonitoringStation
LakewaterMonitoringStation
RiverWaterMonitoringStation
TransitionalWaterMonitoringStation
p:/lawait/multimed/present/workshopbrussels050216_wk.ppt
s:\AK\AK-nachweise\ahu_info_folien.ppt

8. example SWB 1+2  SurfaceWater-templates
Sheet Code
No.
Reporting Sheet Title
GIS
DAT
TEX
Equivalent WB-template
Relevant attributes
Comparison results
SWB 1 1
Typology of surface water bodies X
RiverSegment (line)
LakeSegment (poly)
TransitionalWaters (poly)
CoastalWaters (poly)
TypeCode
TypeName
CharacterType
all data implemented
statistics have to be created externally
summary text for RBD to be added
SWB 2 2
Identification of surface water bodies X
RiverSegment (line)
LakeSegment (poly)
TransitionalWaters (poly)
CoastalWaters (poly)
EuropeanCode
MemberStateCode
Name
TypeCode
X_Coordinate
Y_Coordinate
SizeTypology
most data implemented except centroid (X, Y) and total length fro rivers and transitional waters; scale of size calculation
statistics have to be created externally
summary text for RBD to be added
Methods/criteria are not harmonised on international RBD-level
p:/lawait/multimed/present/workshopbrussels050216_wk.ppt
s:\AK\AK-nachweise\ahu_info_folien.ppt

9. more examples sheets  templates
Sheet Code
No.
Reporting Sheet Title
GIS
DAT
TEX
Equivalent WB-template
Relevant attributes
Comparison results
GWB 1 5
Identification and initial characterisation of groundwater bodies X
GroundwaterBody (poly)
EuropeanCode
MemberState-Code
Name
Most data implemented except centroid (X, Y) and the optional capacity m³
Statistics have to be created externally
Summary text for RBD to be added
SWPI 2 7
Identification of surface water bodies at risk X
RiverSegment (line)
LakeSegment (poly)
TransitionalWaters (poly)
CoastalWaters (poly)
RISK_CHEM
RISK_ECST
RISK_ECPO
RISK_DATE
Most data implemented but:
risk assessment for quantitative status is new (not provided in GIS-Guidance);
relationship to main pressures was planned for 2009
Summary text for RBD to be added
p:/lawait/multimed/present/workshopbrussels050216_wk.ppt
s:\AK\AK-nachweise\ahu_info_folien.ppt

10. conclusions of comparison: differences / conformities
data requirements differ between Report Sheets and GIS-Guidance/WasserBLIcK-templates
 in general: reporting sheets are less detailed than WB-templates
partly missing data in WasserBLIcK-templates
especially data combined approach are requested earlier than implemented in WaserBLIcK
WasserBLiCK-templates are already technically implemented on a high level (in accord. GIS-Guidance)
demanded international harmonised methods and criteria not fulfilled in any aspects at this stage of implementation
p:/lawait/multimed/present/workshopbrussels050216_wk.ppt
s:\AK\AK-nachweise\ahu_info_folien.ppt

11. Questions to be answered
codes: international co-ordination, certification?
definite reporting guidance
GIS-specifications (geometry and attributes)
how is the summary text to be reported? (database, areas,...)
how have elements of reporting sheets to be delivered? (especially text) ...
how can COM-definitions profit from WasserBLIcK experiences
reducing work and investment risk
p:/lawait/multimed/present/workshopbrussels050216_wk.ppt
s:\AK\AK-nachweise\ahu_info_folien.ppt

12. W. Kappler, ahu AG w.kappler@ahu.de
Transition from short term solutions to long term solutions for reporting data management
W. Kappler, ahu AG
p:/lawait/multimed/present/workshopbrussels050216_wk.ppt
s:\AK\AK-nachweise\ahu_info_folien.ppt

13. Reporting 1. Phase bis März 2005
Wasserrahmenrichtlinie
SCG: CIS Strategy
WHG
LWG
LAWA-Arbeitshilfe
Länder-Leitfäden
WGs: fachl. Guidances
WasserBLIcK (Schablonen)
analoge Bericht-erstellung
WG GIS: GIS Guidance 1
BMU LAWA
EU-Berichterstattung
p:/lawait/multimed/present/workshopbrussels050216_wk.ppt
s:\AK\AK-nachweise\ahu_info_folien.ppt

14. Reporting Szenario 2. Phase ab März 2005
Wasserrahmenrichtlinie
SCG: Strategic Docs
WHG
LWG
SZENARIO
LAWA-Arbeitshilfe
Länder-Leitfäden
WGs: fachl. Guidances
WG D: Reporting Guidance
WasserBLIcK templates
digitale Berichterstellung
GIS Experts: GIS Guidance 2
reporting sheets
BMU LAWA
EU-Berichterstattung
WISE
p:/lawait/multimed/present/workshopbrussels050216_wk.ppt
s:\AK\AK-nachweise\ahu_info_folien.ppt