Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Smart EOL™ Case Study: Reducing Waste and Increasing Profitability

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Smart EOL™ Case Study: Reducing Waste and Increasing Profitability"— Presentation transcript:

1 Smart EOL™ Case Study: Reducing Waste and Increasing Profitability
CRRA 40th Annual Conference & Roadshow Case Study: Reducing Waste and Increasing Profitability Mr. Michael Gross Dr. Ramesh Srinivasan August 10, 2106 Smart EOL™

2 Outline Zanker Recycling Challenges &Opportunities
Smart EOL™ Case Study: Financial & Environmental Impacts Extended Capabilities of Smart EOL Q&A

3 Zanker Recycling: Background
Full Service: Resource Management Composting/Recycling Landfill Operations: Demolition Debris Recycling Construction Waste Processing Asphalt Shingle Processing Concrete Recycling Sheetrock Recycling Wood Waste/Brush Recycling Sales of Landscape Products 900,000 tons / year

4 Zanker Recycling: Material Recovery Processes

5 Zanker Recycling: C&D Line

6 Zanker Recycling: Material Recovery Processes

7 Zanker Recycling: Material Recovery Processes

8 Zanker Recycling: Challenges
Lack of reliable information: Operation and Material Specific Inputs and Outputs (tonnage, revenue) Flow of materials from one operation to another Multi-period trends of materials flow Commodity Prices and Trends in the market place Creates Negative Impacts Diminishing Profits Reduced Competitiveness Declining Recycling Rates

9 Zanker Recycling: Operating Principle
Challenge “industry standard” Reshape what is expected from waste recyclers Maximize Diversion Operations add: Financial Value Social Value Environmental Value

10 Zanker Recycling: Solutions
Updated Scale System Software Increased reliability of data

11 Zanker Recycling: Solutions
Piloted Smart EOL Cloud Software Inbound & Outbound Materials: Trends on Volume, Revenue, Price Aggregations of Material Categories Mix % for Different Materials/Categories Multi-site Visibility Pilot Completion January ‘16

12 Critical Decisions for a MRF
How should the inbound materials be priced? Outbound Tonnage, Revenue, Price Inbound Freight $ Inbound Tonnage, Revenue, Price

13 Critical Decisions for a MRF
When price for outbound material increases, MRF can afford to decrease the price of inbound materials, and still be profitable ??

14 Critical Decisions for a MRF
When price for outbound material decreases, MRF must increase the price of inbound materials in order to be profitable. ??

15 Critical Decisions for a MRF
It is challenging to determine prices for inbound materials in the real environment with multiple inbound/outbound materials ????

16 Smart EOL Extended Capabilities

17 Smart EOL Extended Capabilities
6. Transactional Pricing for Profitability 1. Transactional Pricing for Profitability Inbound Freight $ 5. Respond to Commodity Prices 2. Bundle Inbound Freight 3. Costing Accuracy 4. Bundle Outbound Freight

18 Smart EOL Extended Capabilities
See your costs and profits

19 Case Study Results

20 Zanker Recycling: Opportunities

21 Zanker Recycling: Opportunities

22 Zanker Recycling: Opportunities – Problem Finding

23 Case Study: Financial Impacts
Visibility to revenues and costs resolved accounting issues Better data management resulting in: Streamlined expenses Increased profits Investing in new recycling operation at a cost of $2.2M. Expected to reduce expenses, increase profits, increase recycling rate by 5% (at throughput of 900,000 tons per year)

24 Case Study: Environmental Impacts
Zanker’s output results in the following benefits (Study Period: Nov 2015 – June 2016)* Total Change in GHG Emissions (MTCO2E): ,000 Roughly equivalent to: Removing annual emissions from: 69,000 Passenger Vehicles Conserving 3.7M Gallons of Gasoline Conserving M Cylinders of Propane Used for Home Barbecues Total Change in Energy Use (million BTU): M Roughly equivalent to: Conserving 35,000 Households' Annual Energy Consumption Conserving 666,000 Barrels of Oil Conserving 31M Gallons of Gasoline *Assumptions: Calculations Based on EPA’s WARM Model. Full scale estimation for Cope Recycling will be attempted. Electricity Grid Mix, Landfill Conditions: National Average Distance Traveled (inbound + outbound): 20 miles; this can be varied.

25 Zanker Smart EOL Implementation: Next Steps
Increase number of sites where Smart EOL is deployed Increase number of users

26 Thank You! Questions? For a 30-day Free Trial of Smart EOL
Contact: Ramesh Srinivasan ,


Download ppt "Smart EOL™ Case Study: Reducing Waste and Increasing Profitability"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google