Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

N. Bousserez, R. V. Martin, L. N. Lamsal, J. Mao, R. Cohen, and B. R

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "N. Bousserez, R. V. Martin, L. N. Lamsal, J. Mao, R. Cohen, and B. R"— Presentation transcript:

1 Improving OMI NO2 retrievals over biomass burning: towards a measurement-based AMF
N. Bousserez, R. V. Martin, L. N. Lamsal, J. Mao, R. Cohen, and B. R. Anderson

2 NO2 retrieval Ωv = Ωs /AMF Ωv = Vertical Column Ωs = Slant Column
Spectral fitting AMF = Air Mass Factor Radiative transfer calculation Most of you are familiar with the algorithm used in the OMI NO2 retrieval… Geometric correction Scattering weights (Radiative transfer model + model output) Shape factor: normalized NO2 profile (model output) Uncertainties dominated by errors in AMF  ~30-55 % over polluted area (Boersma et al. 2004)

3 Questions Fires are random events that cannot be easily simulated in real-time in models. Fires emit important quantities of NOx and aerosols. Impact of fire emissions on AMF calculation?

4 ARCTAS 2008 experiment Summer phase (June, 18 - July, 13)
Boreal forest fires over central Canada DC-8 measurements: NOx concentrations Aerosol optical properties Total number of fires Measurements are used to evaluate the model outputs (don’t mention GC yet) NASA DC-8 DC-8 flight tracks

5 DABEX 2006 experiment (AMMA SOP-0)
Dry season (Jan., 13 – Feb., 2) Savannah fires FAAM BAe 146 aircraft: NO2 measurements Aerosol optical properties AERONET stations: Aerosols optical properties Total number of fires FAAM BAe 146 FAAM BAe 146 flight tracks

6 Modeling tools LIDORT radiative transfer model
Multilayer atmosphere with multiple scattering (discrete ordinate method) 0.5 km vertical resolution INPUTS: viewing geometry, cloud fraction, cloud pressure, surface albedo, aerosol optical properties, NO2 shape profile GEOS-Chem near-real time simulation: GEOS-Chem v Modifications: David Streets 2006 emissions over SE Asia & China FLAMBE daily biomass burning emissions GEOS-5 Metfields Horizontal Grid: 2º lat x 2.5º lon Vertical Grid: Reduced 47 layers Provide NO2 shape profiles + aerosol optical properties profiles

7 GC vs. aircraft measurements
(measurements impacted by biomass burning only) ARCTAS DABEX aircraft meas. GC Shape factor Shape factor Talk about SSA and AOD validation using AERONET also Extinction(km-1) Extinction(km-1)

8 Aerosol sensitivity analysis
ARCTAS DABEX AMF Mean: 3% Aerosol cor = Mean: -18% AMF w/o aero Aerosol correction factor Aerosol correction factor shielding effect GC extinction GC extinction aerosols CALIPSO CALIPSO

9 Local measurement-based correction for aerosols?
Cloud impact on aerosol correction African savanna aerosol correction Aerosol correction Aerosol correction R = 0.81 Y = 0.91 X Cloud fraction 1 – 0.18 AOD + AOD*Cloud fraction Aerosol correction = 1-α.AOD + Cld frac.AOD Aerosol artefact: Aerosol layer increases cloud fraction Increases aerosol correction Needs for OMI AOD at 440 nm Combine with AI to detect elevated aerosol layer?

10 Shape factor errors Shape factors: over fire GC pixel
Representativeness errors GC pixel Space & time variability of emissions Standard simulations use climatology We use a daily biomass burning inventory (MODAPS)

11 Shape factor correction dominates BB correction
AMF Shape factor cor = shape factor bb correction (shape factor + aerosol) bb correction AMF w/o bb DABEX Mean AMF correction: -62% -69% ARCTAS -38% Mean AMF correction: -32% Shape factor correction only ~ total BB correction

12 Development of a measurement-based shape factor correction
retrieved profile true profile reference column “perfect” retrieval A B C profile w/o bb C NO2 Correction = A A - B ΔNO = B GC-derived relationship

13 Proof of concept Orig =OMI DP_GC New – Orig ΔNO2 =
New = OMI w/ measurement-based AMF Orig ΔNO2 = New – Orig 06/30-07/10 average DABEX MODIS AOD Orig ΔNO2

14 (measurement-based AMF)
Indirect validation: OMI-derived vs. ground-based surface concentrations Temporal correlation Orig (OMI DP_GC) This method can also be applied to anthropogenic emissions… New (measurement-based AMF)

15 Conclusion Canadian boreal fires: aerosol correction increases AMF but negligible (mean ~ +3%) Western Africa savanna fires: aerosol correction decreases AMF (mean ~ -18%)  shielding effect due to an elevated aerosol layer. Results show paths toward a measurement-based correction for aerosols over savanna fires. Shape factor perturbation dominates the AMF correction associated with fire emissions. Development of a measurement-based AMF. First evaluations show improvements compared to the original product.

16 THANK YOU


Download ppt "N. Bousserez, R. V. Martin, L. N. Lamsal, J. Mao, R. Cohen, and B. R"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google