Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Assessing Avocado for Laurel Wilt Resistance, Fruit Quality, and Horticultural Traits for Production in East-Central Florida Cristina Pisani1, Mark A.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Assessing Avocado for Laurel Wilt Resistance, Fruit Quality, and Horticultural Traits for Production in East-Central Florida Cristina Pisani1, Mark A."— Presentation transcript:

1 Assessing Avocado for Laurel Wilt Resistance, Fruit Quality, and Horticultural Traits for Production in East-Central Florida Cristina Pisani1, Mark A. Ritenour1, Ed Stover2, Anne Plotto2, Randy C. Ploetz3, Osman A. Gutierrez4, and David Kuhn4 1Indian River Research and Education Center, Univ. of FL, Ft. Pierce, FL USDA-ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory, Ft. Pierce, FL Department of Plant Pathology, Univ. of Florida, Homestead, FL USDA-ARS, Subtropical Horticulture Research Station, Miami, FL 33158 INTRODUCTION Avocado (Persea americana Mill.) is a high-value specialty crop with U.S. commercial production in California and Florida. The Florida avocado industry contributes ~$13 million to the economy with ~6,800 production acres in Miami Dade County. Unfortunately, the avocado industry is threatened by the fungal disease laurel wilt (LW; Raffaelea lauricola) vectored by the Asian ambrosia beetle Xyleborus glabratus. Identification of an LW-resistant cultivar with good fruit quality and horticultural traits may provide a useful alternative crop in east-central Florida where citrus production is markedly declining. GENERAL OBJECTIVES Phenotypic data collection on a California population of Hass x Bacon & Bacon x Hass for a genetic mapping study Identify selections for East-Central Florida with excellent horticultural traits and disease resistance MATERIALS AND METHODS Hass x Bacon and Bacon x Hass avocado Bi-weekly bloom evaluation based on the presence of clusters and flowers/shoot with an estimation of open flowers at each evaluation Two harvests took place on separate sets of trees loosely based on slowing of fruit sizing and beginning of fruit drop 16 fruits per tree were harvested for postharvest evaluation Evaluation of fruit disorders, fresh and dry weight, size, skin color, seed weight, oil content, no. fruits/tree, and fruit and pulp firmness Informal taste panel comprised of 10 judges with 6 promising selections plus store-bought Hass used as a control Plant ID Mean fruit length (mm) Mean fruit width (mm) Mean fruit weight (g) Mean fruit flesh weight (g) No. of fruit per tree R5 T56 141.9 79.6 400.9 356.7 55 R6 T29 106.4 71.1 268.3 203.7 102 R7 T21 101.1 72.9 264.1 209.0 133 R7 T36 132.7 73.1 306.8 268.6 117 R8 T23 99.8 65.9 213.3 147.7 66 R8 T36 100.2 69.3 248.4 189.5 225 Date of harvest No. of trees Distance (mm) Peak force (g) Mean force (g) 10/29/2013 120 2.5 97.7 45.7 11/14/2013 44 81.9 38.6 Significance - <.0001 Table 3: Tree differences in fruit in peak and mean force for first harvest and second harvest. Force was recorded at 2.5 mm deformation & determined at 2 points on the equatorial region of each fruit Fig. 3: R5 T56 fruit selection of Bacon x Hass Table 1: Mean fruit length, width, weight, flesh weight, and number of fruits per tree from six promising avocado selections Plant ID Days to reach ripeness stage Whole fruit firmness (N) R5 T56 12 18.7 R6 T29 11 20.6 R7 T21 16.5 R7 T36 16.2 R8 T23 13 20.0 R8 T36 14.7 Photo courtesy of D. Kuhn Table 2: Whole fruit firmness of first year selections of Hass x Bacon and Bacon x Hass avocado. Fruit were considered ripe upon reaching 10 to 20 N Fig. 4: Panelists overall liking of first year selections based on % responses for texture and flavor Fig. 2: Avocado flowers opened in the female stage CONCLUSIONS & DISCUSSION Peak bloom ranged from March 14 to April Flowers occurred on almost every shoot apex with 40% open flowers on March 4, 2013 Less than 5% of open flowers remained by April 26, 2013 Mean fruit weight was highly variable between individual hybrids, ranging between 96.8 and grams & range of seed/flesh weight was 2.7 to 10.4 In a taste panel, there was no statistical difference in preference among Hass and initial hybrid selections. Numerically, R8 T36 selection was liked just as much as the store-bought Hass. One of the selections that panelists “liked moderately” and “liked very much” was rated as having a creamy and smooth texture with a nutty flavor. This selection is promising as it has a seed to flesh weight ratio of 8.1 and the skin turns dark during ripening helping mask minor imperfections We have a population with good variability & a lot of diversity that we were able to identify Extensive phenotypic dataset will be used to identify DNA markers with important traits of interest Fig. 1: Date of peak bloom from 3/4/23 to 4/26/13 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank the University of Florida and United States Department of Agriculture for financial support. We also thank Shamima Hossain, Mac Hossain, Dave Wood, and USDA Ft. Pierce & Miami field crews for all laboratory & field assistance. Fig. 5: First year avocado selections included in taste panel of Hass x Bacon & Bacon x Hass


Download ppt "Assessing Avocado for Laurel Wilt Resistance, Fruit Quality, and Horticultural Traits for Production in East-Central Florida Cristina Pisani1, Mark A."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google