Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

European Structural and Investment Funds Community-led local development EU Commission - DG Regional and Urban Policy Peter Takacs – peter.takacs@ec.europa.eu.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "European Structural and Investment Funds Community-led local development EU Commission - DG Regional and Urban Policy Peter Takacs – peter.takacs@ec.europa.eu."— Presentation transcript:

1 European Structural and Investment Funds Community-led local development
EU Commission - DG Regional and Urban Policy Peter Takacs –

2 New features on CLLD for 2014-2020
Building on the long-standing experience of LEADER and the EMFF, CLLD is now open to all the four European Structural Investment Funds (ESIF: EAFRD, EMFF, ERDF and ESF) A common set of principles and rules for all the ESI Funds (Common Provisions Regulation Art ) Coordination of ESI Funds and multi-fund strategies encouraged (possibility for one lead Fund)

3 CLLD principles Sub-regional areas: local territorial approach Concentration of Funds on the most needed areas – flexible and responsive solutions to address local and changing needs Community-led partnerships: participatory approach Co-responsability and ownership. No one interest group whether public or private dominates in the local action groups. Integrated multi-sectoral local strategies Horizontal integration with other local actors – vertical integration with other levels in delivery and supply chains Innovation New ways of thinking and doing – new markets, products, services, social innovation Networking and cooperation Local areas and communities learning from each other – new allies for strengthening their position

4 Urban and territorial dimension of CP 2014-2020 The integrated, place-based approach
Why? to help address territorial challenges in their complexity through CP to help align specific local development needs with the thematic priorities of CP to promote multi-level governance (empowerment and cooperation) How? PLANNING: requesting long-term and integrated urban/territorial strategies PARTNERSHIP: by fostering horizontal and vertical cooperation (urban-rural, LAGs) FLEXIBILITY: allowing to combine different sources of thematic funding to support the implementation (ITI, CLLD) INCENTIVE: earmarking resources in pursuit of these objectives (SUD Article 7) OWNERSHIP: giving more responsibility to the local level (SUD Article 7, CLLD)

5 Concentration on Europe 2020 priorities
Thematic dimension: Concentration on Europe 2020 priorities Smart growth Research & Innovation ICT SME Sustainable growth Low-carbon Resource-efficiency Risk-prevention Transport Inclusive growth Employment Social inclusion Education Territorial dimension: Integrated strategies and actions Urban <=> rural linkages Urban neighbourhoods Cities and towns Functional urban areas, metropolitan regions Other functional economic or geographic areas Rural areas

6 2014-2020 - Thematic objectives (1)
01 Strengthening research, technological development and innovation 02 Enhancing access to, and use and quality of, information and communication technologies 03 Enhancing the competitiveness of small and medium- sized enterprises, the agricultural sector 04 Supporting the shift towards a low-carbon economy in all sectors 05 Promoting climate change adaptation, risk prevention and management 06 Preserving and protecting the environment and promoting resource efficiency 07 Promoting sustainable transport and removing bottlenecks in key network infrastructures

7 2014-2020 - Thematic objectives (2)
08 Promoting sustainable and quality employment and supporting labour mobility 09 Promoting social inclusion and combating poverty and any discrimination (ERDF CLLD: IP 9d) 010 Investing in education, training and vocational training for skills and lifelong learning 011 Enhancing institutional capacity of public authorities and stakeholders and an efficient public administration (012) Technical Assistance

8 Types of CLLD within Cohesion policy
Small areas within cities, deprived urban neighbourhoods and historic centers but also other types Smaller cities and their surrounding rural areas Rural areas, urban-rural linkages Target group approaches (ESF) Thematic approaches e.g. environment, social inclusion

9 Cohesion policy support to CLLD ERDF and ESF allocation by MS
Programming results 18 MS apply CLLD in CP EUR 1.8 billion ERDF 1.1 bn (0.6%) ESF bn (0.8%) For comparison: EAFRD 6.9 bn (7%) EMFF bn (9%) 14 MS use both funds GR, HU, PL, PT, SE via multi-fund OP Concentration 92% by 9 MS 25% by CZ alone

10 Cohesion policy experience
CLLD as a voluntary instrument in Cohesion Policy, has a modest uptake under the ERDF and ESF (in total 18 MS, EUR 1.8 bn for the two Funds together). Territorial focus depends much on the national or regional coordination with EAFRD and EMFF. Complementary arrangements usually target rural areas involving small towns (e.g. CZ, SE, SK), while some MS use ERDF in distinctly urban settings for social inclusion (e.g. HU, PT, RO, UK). Some elements (e.g. thematic concentration, requirements linked to performance framework and different sets of rules of ESI Funds) could have had an unintended impact counteracting the incentives for wider uptake of the integrated approach, especially in terms of combining resources from several programmes or funds and delegating to local level.

11 Main added value experienced
Links created between local strategies and EU level thematic objectives, Promoting strategic thinking at different levels and enforcing prioritisation of actions, Synergies through combining ESIF funding and other financial sources for targeted local interventions, Enhancing coordination and cooperation mechanisms among and within different territories , Integrating different thematic priorities and providing synergies between sectorial and other domestic strategies, Supporting and stimulating public participation, networking and capacity building at local level, and bringing Europe and Cohesion Policy closer to citizens.

12 Challenges and follow-up actions
Challenges identified Separate fund specific rules undermine applying a multi-fund approach in SUD Reluctance of MS level to delegate responsibilities (IB status of urban authorities, uptake of CLLD) High number of small towns raises concerns about adequate administrative and management capacity Slow launch of implementation of territorial instruments (SUD, ITI, CLLD) Lack of information on content of the territorial strategies Actions planned or in progress Invest in capacity building for urban authorities through Urban Development Network URBACT Implementation Networks TAIEX Peer 2 Peer Close follow-up to ensure compliance with provisions and accelerate implementation Enhance cooperation of ESIF DGs on CLLD Study and expert work launched on territorial strategies due Q32017

13 3rd Joint ESIF CLLD Seminar in November 2017
organised by DG Regio and DG Employment DG REGIO collaborative platform plus.google.com/+EuropeanCommission Sign up for our 'REGIOFLASH'

14 CLLD supported by several EU policies and Funds - joint approach
Guidance to local actors, including examples: Guidance to national and regional authorities:


Download ppt "European Structural and Investment Funds Community-led local development EU Commission - DG Regional and Urban Policy Peter Takacs – peter.takacs@ec.europa.eu."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google