Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Implementation Proposition A Practical Way of Delivery

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Implementation Proposition A Practical Way of Delivery"— Presentation transcript:

1 Implementation Proposition A Practical Way of Delivery
AFM Solvency II Implementation Proposition A Practical Way of Delivery

2 Presentation Contents
The contents of this presentation are shown below Gain-Line & Solvency II; What is Solvency II and the Key Elements that will affect your Firm; The Gain-Line Proposition and Benefits; How it Will Work in Practice; Pricing and the Cost Benefits Key Deliverables. 2

3 Gain-Line & Solvency II The Gain-Line Consortium
Solvency II is the biggest ever exercise in bringing together insurers and re-insurers under one regulatory regime Solvency II is a set of principles and guidelines that apply to the entire market but implementation for smaller firms becomes an issue of proportionality; It is an Enterprise wide initiative that will impact all areas of the business requiring a bespoke approach based upon an interpretation of the regulations; Resources will be scarce and the deadline is unlikely to move; All firms should now have, as a minimum, a project plan in place and should have started their individual implementations; Numerous approaches are being adopted across the market and it is not a case of ‘one size fits all’. Gain-Line is a consortium of companies formed specifically to provide clients with focused Solvency II expertise and resources; Gain-Line is working with a range of firms ranging from small specialist mutuals to quoted Lloyd’s managing agencies; This gives Gain-Line valuable knowledge, expertise and templates all of which can be utilised to fast-track our clients’ implementation of Solvency II. Solvency II Programme The Gain-Line Consortium

4 Solvency II has adopted a 3-Pillar approach
Pillar 2 – Qualitative Requirements & Supervisory Review Governance, Risk Management and required functions; Own Risk & solvency Assessment; Supervisory Review Process. Resulting in… Business Governance; Risk Based Supervision. Pillar 3 – Reporting, Disclosure & Market Discipline SFCR & RSR; Disclosure; Transparency; Support of risk-based supervision through market mechanisms. Resulting in… Transparent Markets. Pillar 1 – Quantitative Requirements Balance Sheet (including Technical Provisions); Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR); Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR). Resulting in… Market Consistent Valuation; Risk Based Requirements. 4 4

5 All firms must have a comprehensive system of governance
The governance system must support and provide for sound and prudent management of the business; Firms will be required to demonstrate good governance and will be required to document :- Policies and Procedures; Roles and Responsibilities; Reporting and Management Information. In addition the governance system must include :- An adequate and transparent organisational structure with a clear allocation and segregation of responsibilities and an effective system for the transmission of information; Written and implemented policies for, at least, risk management, internal control, internal audit and any outsourcing; All policies must be reviewed annually for any material change . The Internal Audit function has to be independent from all other functions; Fit & Proper – the collective knowledge, competence and experience of the management body shall include – market knowledge, business strategy and business model, system of governance, financial and actuarial analysis and regulatory framework and requirements. 5 5

6 Systems & Data The Systems & Data Workstream must deliver a scalable IT infrastructure with the data being Complete, Accurate and Appropriate Solvency II Programme 6

7 The Risk Management Framework
Firms must now ensure that an Enterprise Risk Management is embedded throughout the organisation ERM Framework Elements Governance Accountability 1st line: Line Management 2nd line: Review & Challenge 3rd line: Independent assurance / challenge Structure Decision making (inc. Delegation) Risks & Controls Identification & Assessment Systems & controls i.e.: Policy and approach Core processes & systems Risk appetite set Review & Assurance MI / KPI’s Scenario analysis & stress testing Review & challenge Independent assurance Quantification Base Level (solvency / regulatory) Economic Stress testing / tolerance levels Continually refined risk appetite “Systemic” / Interdependent Risk Governance E.g.: Risks & Controls Financial markets risk Review & Assurance Currency fluctuations Quantification Market changing events Scenario Analysis Contingency Planning - Operational Market changing events Emerging Risk Management Linkage to Strategy Regulatory Risk Governance Risks & Controls Review & Assurance Quantification Regularly updated, clearly documented Group & Capital Risk Governance Risks & Controls Review & Assurance Quantification Liquidity Risk Governance Risks & Controls Review & Assurance Quantification Disclosure & Reporting Operational Risk Governance Risks & Controls Review & Assurance Quantification Market Risk Governance Risks & Controls Review & Assurance Quantification Credit Risk Governance Risks & Controls Review & Assurance Quantification Insurance Risk Governance Risks & Controls Review & Assurance Quantification Pillar 1 MCR, SCR Capital Model etc Pillar 2 ORSA & Supervisory Review Pillar 3 Disclosure & Market Discipline 7

8 Reporting & Disclosure Quarterly and Annual Report
Firms will be required to produce Internal Reports and Management Information and also submit regular reports to the FSA Internal FSA Only Publicly Disclosed Own Risk & Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Routine Report Qualitative elements and Quantitative reporting templates All information necessary to monitor capital adequacy (MCR and SCR) and demonstrate performance of governance structure Regular Supervisory Report (RSR) Quarterly and Annual Report Qualitative elements and Quantitative reporting templates All information necessary for the purposes of supervision Solvency and Financial Condition Report (SFCR) Annual Report Qualitative report with Quantitative reporting templates Required on a regular basis to support management decision making Both reports can also be required in the event of predefined events – i.e. Change of business plan, etc; Reports and additional information can also be requested during a supervisory review. 8 8

9 The Proposition The Proposition is based on members sharing resources and best practice across the member firms Gain-Line will work with those AFM member firms wishing to participate in a collaborative approach to assist in meeting the overall Solvency II requirements; Gain-Line will work with each company individually, as required, to meet their specific requirements; Gain-Line will utilise a core team to co-ordinate all project activities associated with the individual Solvency II projects and co-ordinate resources accordingly across the various projects; The core team will be available to support the production of specific deliverables for individual firms to ensure the minimum requirements are met; Gain-Line will also co-ordinate with third parties such as - AFM – to help influence policy work and define minimum standards for members; Actuarial Firms – to ensure future requirements are dealt with in a co-ordinated way; FSA – to ensure that requirements as they evolve are incorporated into each firm’s implementation project as they develop and key issues are shared for discussion. In this way member firms will share resources and will benefit from learning from what the other member firms are doing; Gain-Line have developed an innovative pricing mechanism for the AFM members wishing to participate based on firm size and resource requirements. Solvency II Programme 9

10 The Benefits of Membership
The benefits of this approach for the member firms are many Programme management and regular updates with Quarterly User Group meetings Common and consistent approach to Solvency II implementation Availability of specialist resources with high level experience Access to standard templates and project delivery tools Lower cost for Solvency II compliance Efficient co-ordination of third party resources between members Benchmarking individual projects against other AFM Member companies Implementation of Enterprise Risk Management within firms Opportunity to develop AFM member specific solutions Access to market knowledge and updates of regulatory developments and initiatives Development of AFM specific minimum standards, with the ability to influence policy for smaller and non-directive firms 10

11 Gaps Identified & Plans Updated
Key Programme Modules Gain-Line has segmented the key implementation areas into modules to facilitate management and resource delivery – see Appendix for sample deliverables Programme Management/Change Management Set-Up Implementation Go-Live Project Review Gap Analysis Risk Function Data Policy Risk Management Framework SFCR Use Test Resource Analysis Compliance Function Data Dictionary Risk Strategy & Appetite RSR Internal Audit Programme Internal Audit Function Data Directory Risk Profile Regular MI Consolidated project plan Actuarial Function Data Controls & Documentation ORSA Documentation Documentation Gaps Identified & Plans Updated SII Project Plan Governance Systems & Data ERM Reporting Go-Live 11

12 Gaps Identified & Plans Updated
Programme Set-Up The Programme Setup phase is key to understanding your individual firm’s Solvency II Project status, identifying gaps and the work effort required to become compliant Project Review Detailed project review to understand your particular firm’s priorities, objectives and status Gaps Identified & Plans Updated Gap Analysis Identification of particular gaps that may be present with respect to Governance, Systems & Data, ERM & Reporting Consolidated project plan Resource Analysis Analysis of your current and future resource requirements during the length of the project SII Project Plan As a bare minimum, you will have an independent QA review of your current Solvency II Project Firms that have previously completed the Gap Analysis, will also benefit from reviewing the progress of their individual projects, and being benchmarked with similar firms 12

13 Pillar V Implementation
Once the reviews have taken place, we will work with individual firms on their own, specific requirements for implementation Firm A Programme Management/Change Management Data Policy Risk Management Framework SFCR Data Dictionary Risk Strategy & Appetite RSR Data Directory Risk Profile Regular MI Data Controls & Documentation ORSA Documentation Governance Systems & Data ERM Reporting Implementation Risk Function Compliance Function Internal Audit Function Actuarial Function Solvency II Programme Firm B Programme Management/Change Management Data Policy Risk Management Framework SFCR Data Dictionary Risk Strategy & Appetite RSR Data Directory Risk Profile Regular MI Data Controls & Documentation ORSA Documentation Governance Systems & Data ERM Reporting Implementation Risk Function Compliance Function Internal Audit Function Actuarial Function 13

14 Pricing We have developed an innovative pricing approach based on the size of firms and the level of their involvement Set-Up Costs Covered by AFM Monthly Participation Annual Premium Income < £10m £1,000 per month Annual Premium Income between £10m and £50m £1,500 per month Annual Premium Income > £50m £2,000 per month Resource Costs As required by Individual Firms Ability to influence the development of an AFM sponsored proportionate response to the Solvency II requirements; A review of each member firm’s current Implementation Plan and a revision to reflect integration into a shared solution; Access to shared expert resources of varying skill-sets as required for varying lengths of time; Attendance at quarterly User Group meetings to discuss Solvency II specific issues and progress of the overall Programme and new developments; Interface with the FSA as Level 3 Guidance is published (Gain-Line are on the Pillar V Expert Group and the information from these meetings will be reported back to the Members); Access to standard tools and toolsets to support the Programme, which have been specifically chosen to help support the various implementations. 14

15 The Cost Benefits - Example
This approach enables the collaborating companies to choose which resources to use as opposed to only having access to one skill-set committed for a period of time Standard Approach* 1 x Project Manager £600 per day for 6 months £ 64,800 1 x Governance Specialist £600 per day for 6 months £ 64,800 1 x IT Specialist £500 per day for 6 months £ 54,000 1 x ERM Specialist £750 per day for 6 months £ 81,000 1 x Reporting Specialist £500 per day for 6 months £ 54,000 Total £318,600 Solvency II Programme Gain-Line Approach* 1 x Project Manager £600 per day for 50 days £ 30,000 1 x Governance Specialist £600 per day for 50 days £ 30,000 1 x IT Specialist £500 per day for 70 days £ 35,000 1 x ERM Specialist £750 per day for 40 days £ 30,000 1 x Reporting Specialist £500 per day for 50 days £ 25,000 Programme Setup £ 4,000 Programme Co-ordination £1,500 per month £ 18,000 Total £172,000 Savings £146,600 15 * Indicative costs for a medium sized company assuming implementation yet to begin

16 Appendix

17 Governance Key Deliverables
Terms of Reference Project overview that includes project objectives, key sponsor & stakeholders, steering committee, reference committee and indicative timescales for implementation; Governance Approach Overall approach to governance, to include :- Compliance Approach The ORSA should assess their solvency needs, risk profile, risk profile and risk tolerances of the organisation, and should be based on historical information, but must consider the forward looking view by incorporating the business plan. Reporting lines; Escalation procedures; Decision making processes; Function interactions; Reporting arrangements; Policies for approved persons; Risk management processes for emerging risks; Risk & MI Reporting; Strategic planning; Outsourcing; Internal controls; Actuarial; Internal audit; Business continuity. 17

18 Systems & Data Key Deliverables
Data Policy/Governance A robust data policy/governance document which defines the date policy and, key data owners and the link between the various data deliverables. Data Dictionary A repository which defines all of the key data elements required for Solvency II, and an explanation of the data elements and a verbal definition of each specific data element. Data Directory A definitive repository of each model input into the standard model. Data Controls & Flow Diagrams A Data Control and Flow Diagram must be created for each input to the standard model, i.e. row of the Data Directory, and cross reference the Data Dictionary. Data Controls Register A complete register of all controls applied to the data as it transfers through the organisation. Controls should also be categorised to show their relevance and strength. 18

19 ERM Key Deliverables Risk Strategy
Defines and documents the firm’s risk strategy comprising the objectives, key principles, risk appetite and assignment of responsibilities. Risk Profile Documentation of current risk profile and amendment of risk register (if appropriate), inclusion of other risks (market, intangible, counterparty). Risk Appetite Documentation of the board’s appetite to risk and to ensure that appropriate policies and procedures are in place to monitor and manage exposures within specified boundaries. Risk Management Framework Need to ensure there is an adequate and appropriate process in place to manage the risks that are defined within the Risk Strategy. The ORSA The ORSA should assess their solvency needs, risk profile, risk profile and risk tolerances of the organisation, and should be based on historical information, but must consider the forward looking view by incorporating the business plan. 19

20 Reporting Key Deliverables
Management Information Specification of regular M.I. where different from existing reports; Templates, management responsibility and process procedures. Own Risk & Solvency Assessment Pro-forma template – subject to Level 3 guidelines; Management responsibility schedule; Process and procedure plan; Draft ORSA policy; Business plan. Regular Supervisory Report Report format and template; Management responsibility schedule and sign-off process. Solvency & Financial Condition Report 20


Download ppt "Implementation Proposition A Practical Way of Delivery"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google