Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

An investigation of the effect of laryngectomy on swallowing and QOL

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "An investigation of the effect of laryngectomy on swallowing and QOL"— Presentation transcript:

1 An investigation of the effect of laryngectomy on swallowing and QOL
NWL Research symposium – Sept 21st 2016 Dr Margaret Coffey Mr Neil Tolley Professor Mary Hickson Mr David Howard

2 Laryngeal cancer 2,315 new cases diagnosed in UK
4 in 10 receive major surgical resection 62% survive for 10 years or more Causes: Smoking, alcohol, occupational exposure Cancer Research UK 2013 18th most common cancer in the UK

3 Breathing after laryngectomy?

4 Voicing after laryngectomy

5 Swallowing after laryngectomy

6 Aim To investigate the effect of laryngectomy on oral intake, self reported dysphagia and quality of life

7 Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) Crary et al 2005
Methods Oral intake Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) Crary et al 2005 Self report dysphagia Any change in ability to swallow? Maclean et al 2009 QOL UOW QOL v4 – HNC general QOL Rogers et al 2002 MDADI – HNC specific to swallow Chen et al 2001 Fois validated 7 item scale - describes patients actual daily intake of food and liquid

8 Results - Demographics
n 50 82% male, 18% female Median age - 66 years (range ) Median time since surgery years (range 4 mths - 29 years) 50 subjects, 82% of sample were male, 18% were female. Median age 66 years (range 43-85). Median time since surgery 6.9 years (range 4 mths-29 years).

9 Results - FOIS 7 Oral intake with no restrictions 11 (22%)
FOIS diet level n 1 No oral intake 2 Tube dependent with minimal inconsistent oral intake 3 Tube supplements with consistent oral intake 4 Single consistency oral intake 1 (2%) 5 Multiple consistency oral intake with special preparation 18 (36%) 6 Oral intake avoiding specific food or liquid items 20 (40%) 7 Oral intake with no restrictions 11 (22%) No patient dependent on enteral feeding 78% experienced some restriction to oral intake

10 Results – self report of dysphagia
78% (n - 39) experienced swallowing difficulty after surgery “Takes a hell of a long time to eat, I’m always hungry” “I’m too embarrassed to eat with others, my food has to be mushy and it looks like baby food” “We have no social life and I feel bad eating when he has so much trouble”

11 Social emotional composite score
Results – UOW QOL v4 Composite score Physical composite score Social emotional composite score Median score (min-max) 82.5 ( ) 78.91 ( ) 68.8 ( ) 3 most important domains over the past 7 days Speech, swallow and activity Thematic analysis of issues not addressed – 6 categories Social Physical Stoma Communication Swallowing Other Median composite score higher than that in Robertson et al 2011 (larger study) Domains reflect those of Robertson et al 2011 Differ to older sti=udies Villasea et al 2005 and Kazi et al 2007 (Speech, appearance and activity) Social I wouldn’t go to a concert, afraid of coughing

12 QOL issues not addressed
Physical I get teased about not swimming Stoma Issues with mucous not covered Social I wouldn’t go to a concert, so afraid of coughing Physical I get teased about not swimming

13 QOL issues not addressed
Communication It bothers me when people turn around to look at me Swallowing Family worry in case I’m choking Other Laughing sounds strange Other I feel suicidal when my prosthesis leaks Other Laughing sounds strange Swallowing Family worry in case I’m choking

14 Results - MDADI 53% took longer to swallow
Emotional score Functional score Physical score Global score Total score Median score (min-max) 73.3 ( ) 76 (28-100) 68.8 (30-100) 80 (20-100) 71( ) Consistent with Robertson et al 2011, global score higher in this study Lower scores than Kazi et al 2006 53% took longer to swallow Commented that they were unlikely to cough on liquids unless voice prosthesis was leaking

15 Conclusions Swallowing difficulty is an issue for patients after laryngectomy Frequently used HNC QOL scales fail to address impairments in functioning specific to laryngectomy Need for a QOL scale specific to laryngectomy

16 Acknowledgements Laryngectomy patients Supervisors
Dr Mary Hickson, Professor of Dietetics, Plymouth University Mr Neil Tolley, Consultant Otolaryngologist, ICHT Professor David Howard, Consultant Head and Neck Surgeon Professor Gary Frost, Imperial College London Collaborators Professor Susan Langmore, Boston University Medical Centre Professor Stephen Leder, Yale University Medical Centre


Download ppt "An investigation of the effect of laryngectomy on swallowing and QOL"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google