Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Eye or Brain Interface? surviving photoreceptor vs. higher neurons

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Eye or Brain Interface? surviving photoreceptor vs. higher neurons"— Presentation transcript:

1 Eye or Brain Interface? surviving photoreceptor vs. higher neurons
retinal process vs. ‘computational eye chip’ higher neurons perform more complex and specialized tasks biofeedback vs. ‘learned cells’ retina is a good candidate for stimulation in case of artificial cochlea, 6 to 8 electrode stimulates 30,000 spiral ganglion cells in RP, 30% of ganglion cells and 80% of inner nuclear layer cells are preserved in AMD, 53% (exudative) - 100% (non-exudative) of ganglion cells are preserved

2 Mimicking visual stimuli
Photoreceptor rescue Photoreceptor / RPE transplantation Gene therapy for known carrier Electrophysiological stimulation of remained neuron electrical stimulation stimulation with neurotransmitter Other somatosensory modalities ‘braille’ stimulation by tactile stimuli obstacle detector

3 Innovative progress Inspiration and Perspiration from late 1980’s
advances in semiconductor technology; VLSI successful result in artificial cochlear implant relatively well-preserved inner retinal neurons in RP & ARMD from late 1980’s retinal stimulation U.S.A.: MEEI-MIT, Wilmer-NCSU, Utah Deutschland: SUB-RET,EPI-RET Austrailia: NSWU Optic nerve stimulator Belgium: Louvain

4 Please, keep in mind... Visual pathway Guiding principle
Photoreceptor - bipolar cell (BC) - ganglion cell (GC) - optic nerve (ON) - lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) - primary visual cortex (VC) in brief, BC - GC - ON - LGN - VC Guiding principle Minimizing the amount of implanted electronics Minimizing disruption of the normal anatomy What kinds of components are needed? image acquisition image processing image transfer neural stimulator power supply

5 Retinal stimulation Stimulation of remained retinal neurons
Indication; RP, ARMD Contraindication; diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, retinopathy of prematurity Electrical stimulation subretinal epiretinal Chemical stimulation neurotransmitter; glutamate

6 Structure of retinal stimulator
Silicon photodiode Pt electrode imbedded silicone rubber Gold electrode imbedded polyimide

7 Subretinal stimulator
Pros Benefit from intraretinal neural processing ‘One-chip’ photosensor - stimulator: simple design Cons Not enough amount of light to stimulate ‘One-chip’ lack of image processing: difficult to personalize after transplantation Reactions of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) Impair diffusion of nourishment Stimulation level: BC  GC  ON  LGN  VC SUB-RET; Tuebingen/Reutlingen Univ. of Illinois / Optobionics Artificial Silicon Retina (ASR™) Human trial on July

8 Subretinal Optobionics

9 Optobionics Experiments under FDA permission on ‘in vivo biocompatibility’ 6 & 4 patients with RP, from 45 to 76, central island remained No ERG response by daylight stimuli on ASR™, but active ERG by direct IR laser stimuli on it Postoperative 1 to 6 months ETDRS vision improvement: 1 up to 2 character reading: 4 no change: 5 HVF C30-2: improvement of central island in clover shape in 2 patients All the patients showed decreased vision after 32 months Cx.: Subretinal hemorrhage at PE 'RESCUE EFFECT(?)' restoring cells located near the implant site - insisted by Chow "What we think is happening is the implant is stimulating other cells around the retina. We're finding vision is improving not just where the implant is but also in areas near the implant,” Chow said (ABC News, May )

10 Subretinal SUB-RET

11 SUB-RET

12 Epiretinal Stimulator
Pros Anatomical advantage: Easy accessibility by traditional method Cons Traumatic fixation Protrusion Inciting destructive cellular reactions bypass intraretinal process: personalization is necessary Retinal nerve fiber stimulation: noisy signal ? Stimulation level: BC  GC  ON  LGN  VC MEEI (Harvard) / MIT Doheny / USC / SecondSight ‘Stevie Wonder’ happening EPI-RET; Bonn / Koeln / IIP

13 Epiretinal Harvard-MIT

14 Epiretinal Doheny-SecondSight

15

16

17 MARC - Multiple Artificial Retina Chip Set
Image input can be taken from either PC or camera FPGA performs any image processing on behalf of the implant Class-E amplifier provides power and data wirelessly to the implant Retina-3.55 provides 60 outputs

18 MARC - Multiple Artificial Retina Chip Set

19

20

21 Doheny / USC / Second Sight
4 x 4 active Pt electrode imbedded silicone rubber powered by Clarion® cochlear implant system Operation stimulatory device was located in a pocket drilled in the temporal bone cable was routed underneath the temporalis muscle to the orbit, encircled the eye once, and entered the intraocular cavity via a pars plana incision electrode array was affixed to the retina with a single tack preliminary study in 3 volunteers detect room light: % orientation of “L” : 75% location of white object: 80%

22 Doheny / USC / Second Sight
FDA approved 2nd human trial in 6 patients Electrodes are wirelessly activated using an external controller Electrical stimulation was begun between 7 and15 days post-operative. Thresholds varied both within and across subjects; S1: µA S2: µA S3: µA S4: µ A S5: µA S6: 6-41 µ A 5 patients demonstrated measurable pupil constriction in response to stimulation with their IRP localize the position / count the number of high contrast objects with 74-99% accuracy by3 or 4 Alternative Forced Choice (AltFC) discriminate simple shapes with 61-80% accuracy

23

24


Download ppt "Eye or Brain Interface? surviving photoreceptor vs. higher neurons"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google