Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Distribution of formaldehyde over North America:

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Distribution of formaldehyde over North America:"— Presentation transcript:

1 Distribution of formaldehyde over North America:
Implications for satellite retrievals and mapping of precursor emissions Dylan Millet D.J. Jacob, D.R. Blake, K. Chance, A. Fried, B.G. Heikes, R.C. Hudman, T.P. Kurosu, H.B. Singh, S. Turquety, S. Wu ACCESS VIII Yellowstone National Park September 1-4, 2005

2 Can we use WHCHO as a proxy for VOC emissions?
Volatile organic compunds (VOCs): Precursors of ozone Precursors of organic aerosol Sinks of OH OH, hu, O3 VOC HCHO

3 Key Questions: Measurement: Interpretation
HCHO slant columns measured by GOME (K. Chance, T.P. Kurosu et al.) Key Questions: Measurement: 1) What is the uncertainty and bias in HCHO columns measured from satellites? Interpretation 2) What are the main precursors contributing to HCHO columns and variability over North America? 3) What are the implications for retrieving VOC emissions from space?  Address using aircraft measurements -0.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 LOD 1016 molecules/cm2 HCHO slant columns measured by OMI (K. Chance, T.P. Kurosu et al.)

4 Uncertainty in solar backscatter retrievals of HCHO
1) Fitting uncertainty (~ 4 x 1015 molec/cm2) 2) Relating slant columns to vertical columns Air mass factor (AMF) AMF depends on Atmospheric Scattering Cloud effects Aerosol effects HCHO vertical profile HCHO Model

5 AMF: approach Calculate measured and modeled AMFs using aircraft profiles
Viewing geometry & SZA scattering HCHO vertical distribution measured vs. modeled [HCHO], aerosol DC-8 flight tracks (ICARTT, summer 2004) measured vs. ‘satellite’ clouds

6 AMF: results Mean: 1.2 – 1.3 Range: 0.11 - 2.42 Model bias:
-5% over continents (-57+70%) +13% over ocean (-14+72%) 25% uncertainty for a single scene What drives the variability?

7 Errors in satellite retrievals of HCHO due to clouds & aerosols
Mean Individual profiles Model HCHO vertical profile: -4% mean bias over land +7% over ocean Aerosols: Increase the AMF (i.e. sensitivity to HCHO) by ~16% Clouds: Can ↑ or ↓ AMF Major source of error 2X uncertainty for a single scene Recommend cloud cutoff: AMF error of 40% cloud fraction

8 Interpreting HCHO columns
OH, hu, O3 VOC HCHO Methane, anthro. & biogenic VOCs What drives variability in WHCHO?

9 WHCHO sources & variability
isoprene OVOCs NMHCs methane terpenes WHCHO sources & variability Methane & OVOCs main HCHO precursors in most of the atmosphere But variability in column production rate is low Satellite LOD / tHCHO: ~ 5x1011 molec/cm2 /s Probability Measured column HCHO production rate

10 Relating HCHO columns to precursor emissions
NMHCs methane terpenes OVOCs isoprene Isoprene dominant source when WHCHO is high Variability in WHCHO over N. America driven by isoprene Column HCHO Measured column HCHO production rate

11 HCHO production yield from isoprene
HCHO column mass balance: MOD MOD From measured (WHCHO vs. Wi) & modeled (ki/kHCHO): Y = 1.61 MOD (flighttrack) OBS

12 Conclusions Uncertainty in HCHO columns measured from space
Clouds major source of error Increase AMF uncertainty by ~ 2x  Uncertainty in satellite HCHO columns due to the AMF: Mean bias ~ -5% over continents Uncertainty ~ 25% (1s) for individual scene (less for time averages) Mapping VOC emissions Variability in WHCHO over N. America driven by isoprene  Satellite retrievals of WHCHO can be used as a proxy for isoprene emissions over N. America Estimated average HCHO yield from isoprene oxidation: 1.61 Upper end of GEOS-Chem ( ) NOx-dependent yield

13 Jakarta Chongqing


Download ppt "Distribution of formaldehyde over North America:"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google