Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

3 July 2017 Working with students with Personality Disorder and Risk: Developing the Student Health Emotion Regulation Pathway (SHERPA) Dr Ian Barkataki.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "3 July 2017 Working with students with Personality Disorder and Risk: Developing the Student Health Emotion Regulation Pathway (SHERPA) Dr Ian Barkataki."— Presentation transcript:

1 3 July 2017 Working with students with Personality Disorder and Risk: Developing the Student Health Emotion Regulation Pathway (SHERPA) Dr Ian Barkataki (Clinical lead/Clinical Psychologist) Dr Dominique Thompson (Director of Service/ GP) Students’ Health Service Student Health Association Conference

2 Overview of Session Background
The Student Health Emotion Regulation Pathway (SHERPA) Evaluation GP Experience Questions and discussion

3 Context Ongoing mental health crisis in young people Observing shift towards increased mental health need, along with increasing complexity Increased pressure on NHS mental health services and higher threshold for entry Student Health Service GPs holding more responsibility, greater risk, and feeling limited in degree of input

4 Students with Complex Psychological Needs
Subgroup of students who present with mental health problems along with characteristics of: Personality Disorder Diagnosis -Borderline/ Emotionally Unstable subtype Self-harm Suicidal ideation Impulsivity and other risks

5 Challenges for GPs working with this group in Student Health settings
Time limitations Feeling unskilled Few widely regarded effective interventions Resource demand of this client group Lack of support and close liaison

6 The Student Health Emotion Regulation Pathway (SHERPA)

7 Designing the service Identifying needs of stakeholders Scoping existing practice and resource Consulting guidelines for best practice Putting together a realistic and achievable pathway Ensuring the effectiveness of the pathway

8 Service Philosophy Evidence based (as much as possible) Continual improvement and evaluation Formulation driven rather than diagnostic Continuity of care and containment Highly trained and adaptable personnel motivated to work with this patient group Needs of the team are as important as that of the patients

9

10 Assessment and Formulation
Referral problem Problem duration Early family history Interpersonal patterns Current situation Risk and Impulsivity Prior treatment Medication and Physical Health Goals of Treatment Care Plan Formulation: explains the origins, underlying beliefs and reinforcing patterns of problems. Focus on maintenance of difficulties and other contributory factors.

11 Emotion Regulation Skills Training Class
Weekly psycho-educational class based on CBT and DBT principles Focus on learning skills and practising The class runs for 10 sessions across a university term Allows the facilitators to gauge motivation to engage in treatment, suitability to engage in group treatment and to monitor ongoing risk

12 Mentalisation Psychotherapy Group
Weekly intervention for duration of academic year (30 weeks) Maximum of 8 patients Mentalisation based framework Co-facilitated by a member of the Student Counselling Service For participants, the group is a weekly 90 minute commitment Intake referred from the ER Group and Individual work

13 Individual Psychological Intervention
Formulation driven and tailored to the individual Approach draws from CBT, DBT and Schema Focussed approaches No specified time limit Flexible to the needs of the student or presenting risk

14 Consultation and GP support
Direct consultation with individual GPs Monthly GP peer support group, facilitated by SHERPA team and CMHT Psychiatrist Some provision for joint appointments with GPs and patients Liaison work with other services Discussion about readiness to engage with pathway

15 Evaluation Quantitative measures of symptomatology
Qualitative patient feedback and satisfaction. External objective indicators: GP use, A&E visits, suicide attempts, self harm episodes and attrition. GP Satisfaction with pathway.

16 Evaluation

17 Evaluation- Emotion Regulation Skills Class

18 Emotion Regulation Class Data
No statistically significant difference in the scores for Core, but move toward lower threshold Statistically significant difference in the scores for DERS (M=1.68, SD=0.32) t(31)=4.23, p = <0.001 CORE 10 clinical ranges: 0-10= Non clinical, 10-15= Mild, 15-20= Moderate, 20-25= Moderate to Severe, 25+ = Severe

19 Individual Therapy: CORE 10 and DERS Scores
CORE 10 clinical ranges: 0-10= Non clinical, 10-15= Mild 15-20= Moderate, 20-25= Moderate to Severe 25+ = Severe

20 GP Experience

21 Future Developments Team expansion
Development of additional capability Integration with local Personality Disorder services Ancillary projects/ Grant funding

22 Questions and Discussion

23 Thank you for listening
Ian’s Dom’s Students' Health Service, University of Bristol Hampton House Health Centre Cotham, Bristol, BS6 6AU


Download ppt "3 July 2017 Working with students with Personality Disorder and Risk: Developing the Student Health Emotion Regulation Pathway (SHERPA) Dr Ian Barkataki."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google