Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Normanton/Karumba WTP Upgrade

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Normanton/Karumba WTP Upgrade"— Presentation transcript:

1 Normanton/Karumba WTP Upgrade
Matt Fanning Director TBG Pty Ltd

2 Normanton/Karumba Shire pop: 2100 (Wet season) Karumba residents: 600
Karumba tourists: 2,000 Industry: Mining, tourism fishing

3 Existing Scheme Normanton/Karumba Water Treatment Plant
1963 – Normanton Water Supply Established 1982 – New 300mm rising main and Clear water storage, 23km rising main Karumba connected 42km rising main 1999 – capacity upgrade (copied existing clarifiers), new storages both Normanton and Karumba Capacity of 3.5 ML/day, Storage Capacity 2.36ML Normanton, 5ML Karumba

4 Project Summary Normanton/Karumba Water Treatment Plant
2000 – Planning report – $1.68M 2003 – SCAP funding awarded - $3M grant 2004 – Glenore Weir raising investigation 2006 – Telemetry system implemented (basic automation, but mainly alarms and reporting) further investigations little traction October 2009 – Peer Review Hyder Consulting 2009 – Advised by State that SCAP Funding Withdrawn loss of $1M back to Government November 2009 – Design Awarded to BTO December 2010 – Works commenced June 2011 – Works completed

5 Scheme Issues High Operator costs – Manual processes
Difficult to operate – SCADA not full automation High risk of water quality failure Changing water quality guidelines Building required renewal Equipment out dated and high maintenance Upgrade could only occur during the wet season

6 Scheme Vision To implement a cost effective and reliable Water Treatment System for the towns of Normanton and Karumba.

7 Basic Principles of WTP
Pump water from source location

8 Basic Principles of WTP
Remove large particles in clarifier Coagulant

9 Basic Principles of WTP
Remove fine particles in gravity filter

10 Basic Principles of WTP
Apply disinfection – generally chlorine TO SUPPLY

11 Existing Plant Overview
Filter 6 Clarifier 5 4 3 2 1 Washwater Air Scour Raw Water Existing Building Res. #1 Res. #3 Res. #2 Dosing Points

12 Existing Plant Overview

13 Existing Plant Overview

14 State of WTP in 2009 WTP review (2009)
Catchment management issues leading to raw water contamination; Extremes of turbidity in the raw water difficult to treat; High filtered water turbidity leading to risk of pathogen shielding and breakthrough; Elevated iron levels leading to oxidant consumption and discoloured treated water; Compromised disinfection efficiency; Presence of Hydrogen Sulphide in Supply Sources; Tastes and odours in the treated water.

15 State of WTP in 2009 Existing chemical systems
Did not meet Workplace H&S standards Chemical make-up labour intensive Chemical quality open to human error Chemical dosing set by operator Dosing not proportional with flow

16 Dosing System

17 State of WTP in 2009 Existing Clarifiers
Poor performance at high flows Poor performance when high turbidity Problems de-sludging Odour problems Solids carry-over to filter

18 Clarifiers

19 Clarifiers

20 State of WTP in 2009 Existing Filters
Poor filtration (poor water quality) Manual washing; Labour intensive Damage to filter media

21 Poor filter Performance

22 State of WTP in 2009 Old Backwash system (used to clean filters)
Flow too low (poor washing of media) No standby pump Difficult to prime Labour intensive No NRV fitted to pump

23 Poor Backwash System Air Blower Backwash Pump

24 State of WTP in 2009 Old Air Scour (used to help wash filters)
Air flow too low (poor agitation of media) No standby blower Labour intensive

25 Poor Air Scour System

26 Poor Air Scour System

27 State of WTP in 2009 Chlorine dosing Not proportional to flow
No gas detection & alarm Labour intensive

28 Poor Chlorine Dosing System

29 State of WTP in 2009 General state of building Not cyclone rated
Termite damage Leaking Possible asbestos

30

31 Risk? Risk Assessment Risk Category Risk Item PROB CON Risk Score
Risk Rating Water Quality Protozoa 4 70 280 Very High Bacteriological Disinfection By-Products 3 10 30 Moderate Aesthetics (Taste, Staining) 5 50 High Water Supply Short Term Loss of Supply 200 Extended Loss of Supply 210 Health & Safety Building & Stairways Chemical Handling 150

32 Why Automate? Main reasons to automate the WTP
Reduce labour costs ($200k/yr) Improve quality of water Optimise chemical use (save $$$) Improve reliability of plant Accurate reporting and alarming

33 First Step? Options study 1 – Refurbish existing plant
2 – New clarifier & refurbish existing filters 3 – New clarifier & membrane filtration 4 – Membrane filtration only Include New intake at Glenore Weir

34 New Clarifier & Existing Filters New Clarifier & Existing Filters
Which Option? CAPEX Refurbishment Only New Clarifier & Existing Filters Clarifier & Membrane Membrane Only $ 2,401,000 $ 3,046,000 $ 4,346,000 $ 4,355,000 OPEX Refurbishment Only New Clarifier & Existing Filters Clarifier & Membrane Membrane Only $ ,000 $ ,000 $ ,000 $ ,000

35 New Clarifier & Existing Filters
Which Option? Estimated NPV Year Refurbishment Only New Clarifier & Existing Filters Clarifier & Membrane Membrane Only 15 $ 4,595,000 $ 4,986,000 $ 7,183,000 $ 7,106,000 20 $ 4,943,000 $ 5,305,000 $ 7,647,000 $ 7,558,000 25 $ 5,181,000 $ 5,522,000 $ 7,964,000 $ 7,865,000 30 $ 5,315,000 $ 5,644,000 $ 8,142,000 $ 8,039,000

36 Preferred Option New clarifier & refurbish existing filters
New air scour system New washwater system New chemical dosing New buildings Complete automation

37 Actiflo Clarifier

38 Implementation Construction issues
Operational plant (Normanton & Karumba) Remote location (Materials & skilled labour) Procurement (Australian & New Zealand) WEATHER! 4 phase construction

39 Construction Sequence 1
Filter 6 Clarifier 5 4 3 2 1 Washwater Air Scour Raw Water NEW Building Res. #1 Res. #3 Res. #2 ACTIFLO

40 Temp chemical dosing systems

41 Demolition

42 Construction Sequence 2
Filter 6 Clarifier 5 4 3 2 1 Washwater Air Scour Raw Water NEW Building Res. #1 Res. #3 Res. #2 New Backwash Water New Air Scour ACTIFLO

43 Fabrication

44 Staff Induction Training!

45 Construction Sequence 3
Filter 6 Clarifier 5 4 3 2 1 Washwater Air Scour Raw Water NEW Building Res. #1 Res. #3 Res. #2 New Backwash Water New Air Scour ACTIFLO

46 New pipe work and control valves

47 New Clarifier

48 Construction Sequence 4
Filter 6 Clarifier 5 4 3 2 1 Air Scour Raw Water NEW Building Res. #1 Res. #3 Res. #2 New Backwash Water New Air Scour ACTIFLO

49 New MCC Building

50 Filter Refurbishment

51

52 Filter Control

53 New chemical Dosing System

54 New WTP Building

55 New WTP Building

56 WTP Performance Old Performance New Performance
Raw water quality Turbidity = 50 NTU Old clarifiers Turbidity = 3 NTU After refurbished filters Turbidity = 1 NTU Maximum flow (3 filters) = 36l/s! New Performance After Actiflo clarifier Turbidity = 1 NTU After refurbished filters Turbidity = NTU Maximum flow (3 filters) = 50l/s!

57 WTP Performance

58 What Else? Additions to main contract Norman River PS
Karumba chlorination system upgrade Telemetry system upgrade Procurement Construction management Commissioning

59 Lessons Learnt? Keep it simple Appreciation of location
Supply of materials Available labour/contractors Weather Build as much off site as possible Good working relationship with client

60 Why Use BTO? Excellence in Water & Wastewater Engineering
They delivered on their promises: on time with clear reports & designs with staff / resources promised on budget BTO don’t just write reports – they get things done and deliver!

61 QUESTIONS???


Download ppt "Normanton/Karumba WTP Upgrade"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google