1. Surface Team One (ST1) Overview for Port Engineers Training Symposium September 13, 2016
Captain Timothy A. Crone
Program Manager
NAVSEA, SEA 21 - PMS 443
Surface Ship Readiness and Sustainment Programs
(202)

2. Achieving the Right Balance in Surface Ship Readiness
Get to the fight on time
Achieve O-FRP
Schedule is “king”
Be able to
afford the fight
Reduce churn
Increase buying power
Schedule
Cost
Have Ships capable of winning the fight
Pace the threat
Reduce troubled/costly systems
Increase reliability
Reduce maintenance requirements
Modernization
Service Life
Have enough Ships to
win the fight
Achieve service life 2

3. Surface Team One (ST1) ONE Surface Team
The Surface Maintenance and Modernization Community operating as
ONE Surface Team
The complex world that
Surface Maintenance must consider…
12 ship classes
160+ ships
10 homeports
MSMO, MAC-MO, IDIQ contracts
Frequent turn-over of military personnel
Multiple Processes
Multiple Databases
Many Command / Organizational Process / Product Hand-offs
22 Commands represented on ST1 ESC
7 RMCs
2 Type Commanders
2 Fleet Commanders
4 OPNAV Staffs
“ST1 provides a structure for the management and long-term systematic improvement of quality, schedule, and cost performance across the end-to-end process.”
In order for ST1 efforts to be effective, they require the participation of organizations and individuals in addition to those addressed in the ST1 structure. Therefore, the domain of ST1 includes all stakeholders involved in Surface Ship readiness, maintenance, modernization, and sustainment processes. These stakeholders include public/private industrial and technical organizations and Navy oversight organizations and staffs.
Challenges must be addressed as a unified community, not as individual commands.
ST1 utilizing Knowledge Sharing Networks (KSNs) and other initiatives to collaborate and address issues.

4. ST1 Charter Scope & Purpose
Signed by VADM Rowden (CNSP) & VADM Moore (COMNAVSEA) in August 2016.
The mechanism by which the Surface Navy’s Maintenance, Modernization, and Sustainment Program stakeholders collaborate to achieve maintenance and modernization objectives.
To consistently deliver ships to the Fleet operationally ready, the many organizations involved in maintenance, modernization, and sustainment must approach the their respective efforts as part of the overall Surface Navy end-to-end process.
Means and measures for improvement reflect Ship’s Force, Type Commanders, Regional Maintenance Centers, NAVSEA, NAVAIR, and SPAWAR considerations.

5. Surface Team One Structure
ST1 Governance Council
Senior Flag Oversight Council (SFOC)
CNSP
NAVSEA
Governance Council (GC)
CNRMC
CNSL
CNRMC/
SEA 21
SEA 21
ST1 Executive Steering Committee (ESC)
ST1 Executive Steering Committee (ESC)
ESC Co-Chairs
PMS 443
CNRMC Deputy Director
ESC Members (O-6 / GS-15)
USFFC N43B
CPF N431
CNSL N43
CNSP N43
OPNAV N96
OPNAV N95
OPNAV N43
PEO C4I
PEO IWS
PMS 407
NAVSEA 05D
NAVSEA 04RM
SERMC
SWRMC
MARMC
SURFMEPP
SPAWAR FRD
PMS 505
Knowledge Sharing Networks / CoPs
Advance Planning KSN
Planning
KSN
Execution KSN
Metrics
KSN
LL KSN
Modernization KSN
Assessments CoP
RMC Engineering
CoP
Quality
CoP
C5I
CoP
Corrosion
CoP
LCMG
MMPR
Contracts Governance
FIST
FAST
QER
STAR Board
Forums

6. What Can ST1 Do For Port Engineers?
Conduit to communicate waterfront issues to senior leadership and track through resolution
Forum to collaborate and recommend changes to policy, directives, and processes (e.g. JFMM / Standard Item / 4E changes)
Variety of tools/resources available to accomplish goals and objectives
Lean/Six Sigma/Value Stream Analysis (VSA)
Business Case Analysis
Pilot Initiatives
Tasks Forces/ Working Groups
Focus/Deep Dive Studies
Knowledge Sharing Events (KSE)
ST1 Portal
Career impact and networking opportunities

7. Completed Initiatives of Interest
Surface Force Availability Project Team Handbook: LL KSN
Online Common Operating Picture (COP) Dashboards that present CNO availability and readiness data: Metrics KSN
Updates to (Integrated Schedule): Planning and Execution KSNs
Initiated Adjacent Tank Identification early in BAWP Process: Advance Planning KSN
Developed Corrosion Control Allowance Parts Lists (APLs) for LHA, LHD, LPD and LSD class ships: Corrosion CoP

8. Ongoing/Upcoming Initiatives of Interest
Diesel Maintenance Strategy Improvements: Engineering CoP
VSA event to support standardization of RMC planning: Planning KSN
3PP Funding Deep Dive Working Group: Modernization KSN
Total Ship Readiness Assessment (TSRA) Program Improvements: Assessments KSN
(PCD/LOA Support) Working Group: Execution KSN
Working to address the most relevant waterfront challenges

9. ST1 KSN/CoP Points of Contact
Process Master
Executive Steering Committee Sponsors
Knowledge Manager
Advance Planning KSN
Don Kultti, SURFMEPP
Tom Gallagher, SURFMEPP ED
Paul LeBlanc
Planning KSN
Rich Morrison
CAPT Hugh “Skip” Huck, SWRMC CO
Cindy Young
Execution KSN
LCDR Paul Murch, HRMC C/300
CAPT Dave Gombas, SERMC CO
C5I CoP
Bill Neiger, PEO IWS
CAPT Boehm, PEO IWS
Newman Evans
Corrosion Control CoP
Larry Bowden, SURFMEPP
CAPT Bauer, SURFMEPP CO
Modernization KSN
Tammy Bard, PMS 407
CAPT Byrne, PMS 407
Anna Thompson
Engineering CoP
Dale Hirschman, CNRMC
Eric Lind, NAVSEA 05
David Wuestewald
Quality CoP
Jon Hillenbrand, CNRMC
Katie Branum
Assessments CoP
Kevin Alexander, CNRMC
TBD
Scott Goodwin
Lessons Learned KSN
Dale Morse, CNSL N43
CAPT Tate, CNSL N43
Amanda Rizor
Metrics KSN
Peter Pascanik, CNRMC
Patrick McDermott, CPF N431
Monica Leftwich

10. What Can Port Engineers do for ST1?
Participate in LL KSN events to communicate waterfront issues.
Feedback on the tools/resources necessary for you accomplish goals and objectives. Do you have experience with these? Are there other tools we should be utilizing?
Lean/Six Sigma/Value Stream Analysis (VSA)
Business Case Analysis
Pilot Initiatives
Tasks Forces/ Working Groups
Focus/Deep Dive Studies
Knowledge Sharing Events (KSE)
ST1 Portal
Most importantly: We need PEs to participate in the KSNs--share your tremendous wealth of experience, mentor junior employees, collaborate and recommend changes to policy, directives, and processes

11. Questions/Comments?

12. Back-up

13. ST1 Administrative Products
Administrative Products are maintained and available to all ST1 stakeholders.
ST1 Portal
Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)
The ST1 Portal is a repository of information for all ST1 initiatives including meeting materials, past and upcoming events, action items, etc.
The IMS is distributed weekly to all ST1 stakeholders to provide a current schedule of ST1 initiatives’ activities.
ST1 Monthly Highlights
The ST1 Highlights are distributed monthly and provide ST1 stakeholders with highlights of each ST1 initiative’s progress, challenges, and actions.
ST1 Portal URL:
To register for an iNavy account, go to:

14. Completed Projects/Initiatives Future Projects/Initiatives
Advance Planning KSN
Purpose
Completed Projects/Initiatives
Future Projects/Initiatives
Purpose: To strengthen all surface ship M2 processes.
Identify and improve schedule, content and cost associated with CNO availability programming, planning and execution.
Minimize risks to each ship’s Expected Service Life (ESL) in support of the Surface Maintenance End to End (E2E) process.
Support comprehensive planning and execution phases of the O-FRP cycle through early and precise BAWP development.
Organizations Represented: SEA21, CNSP, CNSL, CNRMC, SWRMC, MARMC, PMS 407, SURFMEPP
1) Processing of SURFMEPP submitted JFMM change proposals. (most CORCON related).
Impact: JFMM changes approved
2) Initiated Adjacent Tank Identification early in BAWP Process.
Impact: All tanks identifiable for entry required and listed at LCPC.
1) Media Blasting as Hot Work – Develop “Point Paper” that identifies adjacent tank opening, cleaning and gas free requirements when performing media blasting of tanks and voids.
2) Based on the AP/Planning Summit, evaluate the impact of the following on maintenance opportunities through the FRP cycle:
Project Team Formulation
Schedule Adherence
3) Evaluate BENL and HENL tank and void considerations WRT the impact tank and void work planning to support comprehensive integration of all tank-affecting work as early in the FRP cycle as possible. Seek a bi-coastal process to HENL/BENL tank impacts.

15. Completed Projects/ Initiatives Future Projects/Initiatives
Planning KSN
Purpose
Completed Projects/ Initiatives
Future Projects/Initiatives
Purpose: To examine the E2E process focusing on the planning process leading to contract award while revising and strengthening common planning policy and processes for alignment and integration with the E2E process.
Organizations represented:
CNRMC, SWRMC, MARMC, NWRMC, SERMC, PHNSY & IMF, CNSL, CNSP, SURFMEPP, SPAWAR, PMS 407, BAE, MHI, NASSCO, PACSHIP, and Vigor.
1) Teamed with the Execution KSN to conduct the review of and provide final input to SSRAC.
Impact: With the Execution KSN , ensured Schedule Implementation Road Show briefed RMC project team leadership to include: CTLs, PMs, ITEs, SBSs, and others on the changes to NSI scheduling concepts and pilot events.
1) Milestone Compliance WG - There is no formalized Execution Planning milestone review process in place to ensure milestone compliance.  With the shift from MSMO to FFP, a formalized review process needs to be in effect for ensuring contractual milestone government tollgate reviews and contractual compliance.
- A working group was stood up for this (SWRMC-Bill Kelly leading), has met five times, and is preparing a formal recommendation to Rich Morrison.
2) Standardize/Improve Class Standard Work Templates (SURFMEPP (Lead)/PKSN (Support))
3) Develop and implement a joint government industry pre-execution schedule review.
4) Clearly articulate how to use 3PP to share KE/MS/ERL

16. Completed Initiatives Future Projects/Initiatives
Execution KSN
Purpose
Completed Initiatives
(since last MMPR)
Future Projects/Initiatives
Purpose: The Execution Knowledge Sharing Network (KSN) is chartered to address process improvements with regard to execution of surface ship availabilities by community stakeholders during the “Execution” phase (A-30 to C+0).
Organizations represented:
CNRMC, NWRMC, MARMC, SWRMC, SERMC, HRMC, CPF, CNSL, CNSP, NSWC PHD, PEO IWS, PMS 407, SEA 05D, SURFMEPP, SPAWAR, AIT Marine Corps, BAE, MHI, NASSCO, Tecnico, PACSHIP, and Vigor.
1) PCD Definition Review: Identify a single definition that is clearly articulated, understood, and acceptable across the Surface Warfare Enterprise.
F2F Conference in January
Source document review
Stakeholder perspectives
Value Stream Map
Root cause identification
JFMM changes for PCD and C5ILO definitions are submitted for review
NSI and revisions in progress
Survey of documentation changes required
1) PCD Definition Review:
Awaiting SSRAC approval for ; review in progress
Develop All Work Complete (AWC) key event: In progress; Briefed at Engineering KSN call for feedback; No formal submission yet
2) Development of Execution Tools (Leading Indicators): Provide predictive tools to the Project Team and develop the concept of using data to drive management focus on the deck plates.
Quantify growth/new work risk
Schedule analysis tools (009-60)
TIP/Work Certification trending
* being monitored by CNRMC via the RMCs; Flow metrics part of the Metrics CoP.

17. Lessons Learned (LL) KSN
Purpose
Completed Projects/ Initiatives
Future Projects/Initiatives
Purpose:
To facilitate communication between Project Teams of all ship classes, across all RMCs, and support activities at various stages in their availability to assist in improving cost, schedule, and performance.
To provide a singled-up approach for evaluating and capturing critical lessons learned and barriers brought forward by PTs in order to facilitate process improvements in the Surface navy.
Organizations Represented:
CNSL NWRMC
CNSP SWRMC
SURMEPP HRMC
SEA JRMC
PMR Norfolk FDRMC
PMR San Diego
MARMC
SERMC
1) The 3rd Edition of the Surface Force Availability Project Team Handbook has been signed and distributed.
2) Successful MMPR in April 2016.
3) Conducted successful Lessons Learned Forum on all ship classes quarterly.
4) Initiated ST1 Knowledge Sharing Events, designed to transmit information from KSNs and CoPs to Availability Project Teams.
1) Continue Availability Closeout Improvement.
1) PT handbook is signed, posted on the ST1 website, and the link has been distributed to community stakeholders.
Impact: This update contains in depth information regarding FFP availability planning and execution, discussion on the RTR process, and expanded information covering firefighting and fire prevention during availabilities.
2) Impact: The LL KSN adjusted the April 2016 MMPR to meet the needs of both Project Teams and Leadership as identified after the September 2015 MMPR. The MMPR continues to be a valuable forum for identifying issues, launching, initiatives and educating the community.
3) Impact: Gathered useful information that is being passed to follow-on availabilities to aid in the transition to 3PP.
Future Projects:
This is in progress plan to implementeto track actions from this MMPR.
We will gather execution lessons learned to be passed to follow-on FFP availabilities and identify areas that may require leadership attention (ie. Policy/process changes, etc.)
We are working with all stakeholders to ensure all CNO Avail work items are closed out and associated costs are captured.

18. Completed Projects/ Initiatives Future Projects/Initiatives
Corrosion COP
Purpose
Completed Projects/ Initiatives
Future Projects/Initiatives
Purpose:
To mitigate corrosion across the Surface Fleet from design through a ship’s life cycle
Garner Corrosion Prevention and Control (CPC) – related information
Capture and communicate success
Identify, escalate and eliminate barriers
Measure and provide feedback on successes
Provide a single venue approach to evaluate Surface Fleet corrosion issues
Organizations Represented:
SURFMEPP, SEA 21 (PMS 407/443), CNSL N43, CNSP N43, ONR / NRL, NSWCCD 6130 & 6140, SEA 05P (Coatings & Structures), SERMC, SWRMC, NWRMC, MARMC, SRF-JRMC, PHNSY & IMF, PSNS & IMF, FDRMC, CCAT, PREINSURV, and CNRMC
Developed Corrosion Control Allowance Parts Lists (APLs) for LHA, LHD, LPD, LSD and PC class ships
Impact: Provide ship force personnel with a source of common fasteners and miscellaneous parts used to provide corrosion control in non-critical systems aboard surface ships
2) Updated polysiloxane cleaning kit to reflect fleet use by ship class
Impact: Reduce occurrence of cosmetic over-coating by providing sufficient quantities of PSX cleaning kits to remove rust stains from exterior topside polysiloxane coatings.
Established more effective communications with deckplate and maintenance teams
Impact: Corrosion Roadshow provides a more concerted effort to communicate new/update corrosion policies and initiatives to deck plate personnel, maintenance community and other stakeholders
1) Assist NSWCCD C6550 with transitioning of composites to the fleet (i.e. electrical boxes, grating, deck drains)
2) Stand up Fluidized Bed Coating facilities at Navy sites (SWRMC and Little Creek)
3) Treatment/protection of water tight closures (WTC) on surface ships
4) Provide logistical support for Polysiloxane and coatings to the Fleet
5) Publish Louvers Inspection and In-Situ Coating Repair procedures in a Maintenance Requirement Card (MRC)
6) Support development and testing of Terahertz (THZ) imaging technology

19. Current Projects/Initiatives Future Projects/Initiatives
C5I CoP
Purpose
Current Projects/Initiatives
Future Projects/Initiatives
Purpose: C5I Troubled System Programs (TSP) support, Tactical Data Link (TDL) systems engineering analysis, COTS-based C5I POR life cycle engineering analysis
Organizations Represented: PEO IWS 1, 2, 5, 8, 10; PMS 400F, 470, 339; TYCOMs N43/N6; OPNAV N96; CNRMC; SURFMEPP; NSWC DD; NSWC PHD; NSWC CRANE; NSWC CORONA; NSWC Dam Neck; NUWC; PMW 150; NAVSEA 04/05H; SEA 21; SPAWAR; CYBERFOR
C5I Troubled Systems Support:
MK99 FCS Documentation Development
AN/SPQ-9B Software Fault Testing
MK41 VLS Hatch Motor Test Bench
MK 160 GWS Obsolescence Study and Display Redesign
AN/SQQ-89 Training Manual Updates/ Engineering Design Review
AN/SSQ-130 SSEE Maintenance Procedures
AN/USC-42 MINI DAMA Obsolescence Study
LCC-19 CSOSS Development
LCC-20 OCSOT MRC Update (complete)
2) TDL WG:
Interoperability Development and Certification Test #1
IDCT #2
3) COTS WG:
Draft CARL VINSON CSG COTS C5I System Maintenance Analysis Report & Best Practices
Interim Distance Support Trade Study
JCS CSG COTS C5I System Maintenance Quick Look
1) FY17 TYCOM C5I Troubled Systems Adjudication Process
2) TDL WG
IDCT #3
IDCT #4
3) COTS WG
Final CARL VINSON CSG COTS C5I System Maintenance Analysis Report & Best Practices
Final Distance Support Trade Study
4) LCS Land Based Engineering Capability location study, analysis and recommendations
Desired Outcomes:
- Implement C5I Troubled Systems sustainment support process
Focus on TYCOM priorities and emergent requirements that impact fleet readiness
Identify OQE measures for each task proposal and monitor OQE for approved and funded C5I CoP work streams
Provide OQE data for Top 60 C5I systems to technical community, SMEs, and TYCOMs in support of task development and/or task proposal modification
- COTS-based C5I POR systems and lifecycle engineering analysis
Identify COTS C5I systems readiness issues, identify root causes/root processes, and mitigation strategies
Identify best practices for use across the Surface Navy
- Tactical Data Link (TDL) systems engineering analysis
Improve TDL End-to-End communications across TDL stakeholders including fleet users, system developers, In-Service Support Engineers (ISEA) and training representatives
- CNO availability assessment reviews
Evaluate availability assessment data to identify recurring issues to determine if further in depth analysis is required
- Address gaps associated with LCS Combat System fleet readiness and modernization
Conduct Land Based Engineering Capability study
Leverage existing lessons learned from other ship classes
Provide mission criticality and Troubled System recommendations
Fiscal Year 2016 Working Group Deliverables / Outputs:
- TYCOM Sustainment (TSP) priorities addressed/funded:
MK99 Repair and Overhaul Documentation Development and Training Improvement
AN/SPQ-9B Software Fault Testing/Indication
OCSOT MRC update for USS MOUNT WHITNEY (LCC20)
MK41 VLS Hatch Motor Test Bench Development
MK 160 Obsolescence Study and Gun Mount Display Panel Redesign
AN/SQQ-89 Training Manual Updates and Engineering Design Review (SMP & Relay Tester)
AN/SSQ-130 SSEE Maintenance Procedures Development
AN/USC-42 MINI DAMA Obsolescence Study
AWN/MFOM Development of Communication Architecture (PCs/LCS)
- C5I COTS
CV CSG COTS C5I System Maintenance Analysis Report
Empirical Readiness / Enhanced Distance Support Trade Study
C5I COTS Systems Maintainability Issues & Best Practices Quarterly Reports
JCS CSG COTS C5I System Maintenance Issues Quick Look
- Tactical Data Link
Adjudicate and analyze Fleet Interoperability Issue reports to identify trends (baselines, conditions, etc.) to a narrow focus and/or be able to recreate to root cause the Fleet reported problem during Interoperability Development and certification Test (IDCT) and provide IDCT Test Reports
- LCS
Land Based Engineering Capability location study, analysis and recommendation
Projected combat systems troubled systems list for combat systems
Inclusion of LCS Combat Systems in IDCTs where available and resources permit
Metrics:
Troubled System Process (TSP) item completion
Mission Criticality Scores improvement
Improved C5I Sustainment practices
Improved C5I COTS readiness and root cause understanding
Improved awareness tactical data link instability issues
Improved availability of RM&A drivers and analysis
Key Assumptions and Necessary Conditions:
Receipt of FY16 funding to enable full execution of tasking

20. Completed Projects/ Initiatives Future Projects/Initiatives
Modernization KSN
Purpose
Completed Projects/ Initiatives
Future Projects/Initiatives
Purpose:
Serve as the underlying community network support for NAVSEA Modernization initiatives, promoting information exchange, lessons-learned, and documenting best practices.
Organizations Represented:
CNRMC
Fleet
OPNAV
PEO C4I
PEO IWS
Planning Yards (PY)
PMS 407
SURFMEPP
1) End to End Process Alignment: Drafted and reviewed 2016 SPM Message reflecting the Fixed Price contracting strategy. Updated process flows have been included in SPM Message Quick Reference Guide.
Impact: Provides clear milestone guidance for Modernization Community.
2) Metric Framework: Identified 3 Metric Areas. (1) LOA Churn: Data is based on signed Letters of Authorization (LOAs) and tracked from A-540 to A-0. This metric also includes Late Add and Deferral Data, (2) LOA Delivery: Comparison of projected and actual LOA Delivery, and (3) SID Delivery: Comparison of projected and actual SID Delivery.
Impact: Metrics enable visibility and improvement opportunities.
3) Training: Mod KSN has completed several products that will be used to train the community (MMPR Modernization Quick Reference Guide and SPM Message Quick Reference Guide).
Impact: As much of the guidance is buried in large volumes of reference documents, these quick sheets and Q&A sessions enable consistent process adherence.
1) Conduct training sessions/Road Show to Project Teams (PTs) for professional development. Continue Training /Awareness Meetings, and distribute training materials.
2) Finalize Metric package, and propose follow on metrics to track in FY17.
Introduction: Insert introduction (if desired). May include: your role/who you report to, a brief overview of your background.
Purpose: Serve as the underlying community network support for NAVSEA Modernization initiatives, promoting information exchange, lessons-learned, and documenting best practices. The Modernization KSN has continued to provide resources for the community that improve Availability Planning and Execution.
Organizations Represented: We continue to have participation from all relevant stakeholders. As always, if you wish to be on the distribution list, contact me or Anna Thompson.
Completed Projects/Initiatives: The Modernization KSN has continued to track ahead of schedule on our Annual Plan Goals. These goals were briefed to RADM Select Galinis Dec 2015.
E2E ALIGNEMENT: We have completed a full analysis of the End to End Process documentation – mapping the JFMM, NMP-MOM and the soon to be issued 2016 SPM MESSAGE. The SPM Message has been reviewed and approved by CAPT Zobel. Release is pending the SEA02 Memo defining Production Period as SOA to Start of Dock Trials and Fleet Message defining milestones for availabilities longer than 6 months in duration. After all messages are sent the Modernization KSN will assist the community in further alignment efforts (i.e. proposing NMP-MOM changes, and consulting on JFMM changes).
METRICS: The Metric framework progress is on schedule. The Mod KSN has developed 3 Metrics: LOA Churn (which includes Late Add/Deferral data), LOA Delivery, and SID Delivery. These metrics are all at different levels of maturity, but all will be complete by the end of 2016.
Several metrics have been provided to PMS 407 Leadership, and will be published summer of 2016.
TRAINING: Training goals are in progress. Our first training session is scheduled for early MAY (hopefully 10 MAY 2016). The Mod KSN has produced an E2E comparison between the JFMM, NMP-MOM, the 2016 SPM MSG, and the Fleet Approved Milestones (for availabilities less than 6 months in duration). The Mod KSN will conduct training sessions/Road Show to Project Teams (PTs) for professional development (Late Summer/Early Fall 2016).
Future Projects/Initiatives: As the Mod KSN continues, we hope to continue conducting training sessions and developing materials. Pending final approval from PMS 407 Leadership, the Mod KSN will publish the metrics and determine next set of metrics to track.
----> Any questions?
Final comments: If there are topics that you think would be useful for the Mod KSN to address during FY17, feel free to discuss with me or Isa Cortes-Hunt.

21. Completed Projects/Initiatives Future Projects/Initiatives
ST1 Metrics KSN
Purpose
Completed Projects/Initiatives
Future Projects/Initiatives
Purpose:
The Metrics Knowledge Sharing Network was established to support the needs of the ST1 Leadership in the management of the Surface Ship maintenance and modernization End to End (E2E) Process. It provides qualitative and quantitative measures, analysis, and metrics relating to ship maintenance process performance to ST1 leadership, as well as other ST1 KSNs.
Organizations Represented:
OPNAV, FFC/CPF, TYCOM, NAVSEA02, NAVSEA04, NAVSEA21(PMS407, 443), CNRMC, RMCs, SURFMEPP, INSURV, NSWC Corona, NSWC Philadelphia
E2E Common Operating Picture (COP)
Advance Planning, Planning, Execution and Closeout Areas specific to CNO Availabilities
16 of 16 BFMs developed, vetted, approved, signed, programmed and tested on the website
Drill-down and analysis capability available to users
2) Readiness (R) COP
CMAV, Reliability/Maintainability/Assessment (RM&A), Supply, CSMP/FTA/DFS, CASREP
16 of 34 BFMs developed, vetted, approved, and signed. Programming in progress
Measures will provide visibility of key areas post CNO Avails and through the OFRP cycle
3) Readiness Kill Chain (RKC) E-Pillar
Ensures coordination across Fleets, SYSCOMs, and TYCOMs, and other partners throughout the readiness production battle space.
RKC identifies the resources that will be used (means), how will they be used (ways), and the desired strategic outcomes (ends)
Support analyses to 34 measures/BFMs
4) Senior Level Metrics
Supports the maintenance requirement process with 6 key measures/BFMs: Cost(Z)/WLA(X), Avail Schedule Adherence (LOD X), Deferral (D)/WLA (X), CNO Avail Inductions, Assessments Overdue and Surface Maintenance Backlog
In process of revising Schedule Adherence metric to reduce variation due to variables in the calendar year and number of ships in availability
1) Continued support of the E2E COP, Readiness COP, RKC, Senior Level Metrics, and Ad Hoc Data Requests
2) Over the next several months, transition several of the manually developed metrics products (ST1 Monthly, ST1 AMPHIB N95 Brief, Senior Level Metrics) to the E2E COP.

22. Quality Assurance (QA) CoP
Purpose
Completed Projects/ Initiatives
Future Projects/Initiatives
Purpose:
The primary purpose of the Quality Assurance CoP is to enhance RMC Quality Assurance Department coordination efforts in achieving a “Global RMC Organization” for Quality that operates in a consistent manner utilizing increasingly common processes.
Organizations Represented:
CNRMC, HRMC (PHNSY), NAVSEA04, NAVSEA05, MARMC, NWRMC (PSNS & IMF), SERMC, SWRMC, SRF Japan, FDRMC, SURFMEPP, ST1 Support
1) Revised NAVSEA Standard Item (KTR Fact Findings and Critiques) to clarify requirements for KTRs for initial fact finding. Revised SI addressing Method “A” CAR workflow integration into NMD. Updated the CAR matrix to provide additional guidance regarding classification of method “A,” “B,” and “C” CARs.
Impact: Improve timeliness, causal analysis, and development of effective corrective actions across the RMCs.
2) Developed and/or modified eight new ‘Safety’ NAVSEA Standard Attributes.
Impact: Standardize safety assessment criteria across the RMCs.
3) Prioritized all NMD Quality Assurance trouble tickets.
Impact: Ensure RMC Quality Assurance NMD needs are communicated to CNRMC NMD Program Manager and Regional ERP Offices.
1) Develop and implement critical process Quality Metrics to track KTR performance.
2) Integrate all required Quality Assurance reports and functionality into the Navy Maintenance Database (NMD) to support the use of NMD as the program of record for all surface ship maintenance actions.
3) Update NSI to reflect changes in ISO 9001:2008 to ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems—Requirements.
4) Continue to update QA Attribute sheets, NAVSEA Standard Items, and the Joint Fleet Maintenance Manual as required to recognize current Fleet and NAVSEA requirements.

23. RMC Engineering (C200) CoP
Purpose
Completed Projects/ Initiatives
Future Projects/Initiatives
Purpose: Enhance RMC Engineering Department coordination efforts in achieving a Global RMC Organization that operates in a consistent manner using increasingly common processes
Organizations Represented:
CNRMC, SWRMC, MARMC, SERMC, NWRMC, HRMC, and SRF-JRMC. SURFMEPP, NSWCs and SEA 04/05 participate as needed (70+ on correspondence distribution).
1) Established Technical Capability Health Assessment (TCHA)
Impact: Effective tool for the Navy technical community to properly forecast workload and manage resources to support the fleet
2)Developed Reservation Task Request (RTR) Estimates
Impact: RTR estimates based off historical data available for use by the Project Team (PT)
3) Transitioned Engineering Service Request (ESR) function into Navy Maintenance Database (NMD)
Impact: Central database for creating, routing, maintaining, and keeping traceable records of all engineering support for ship-related work
1) Develop strategies to improve the Speed of Technical Decision Making and Change Management by: Analyzing Condition Found Reports (CFRs), Request for Contract Change (RCC), Engineering Service Request (ESR) and Departure from Specification (DFS) data and governing requirements to identify areas / process changes necessary to improve cycle time
2)Improving RMC Test Programs
3) Identify opportunities for best use of Process Control Procedures (PCPs) and where they may be unnecessary.
4) Developing framework for Engineering Capability Plan (CP) Model
5) Qualifying and recertifying Master Ship Repair Agreements (MSRA) and Agreements for Boat Repair (ABR)
Other Completed Projects and Initiatives :
Cancelled EPCPs
Transitioning Engineering Service Requests (ESRs) into Navy Maintenance Database (NMD)
Improvements to TAAS-INFO
Common definition for Repair before Operating (RBO)

24. Additional Acronyms Fleet Availability Scheduling Team (FAST)
Fleet Integrated Sustainment Team (FIST)
Life Cycle Management Group (LCMG)
Maintenance and Modernization Performance Review (MMPR)
Quarterly Execution Review (QER)
Surface TYCOM Advisory Requirements (STAR) Board