Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Steve Barlow Pandrol Asia-Pacific

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Steve Barlow Pandrol Asia-Pacific"— Presentation transcript:

1 Steve Barlow Pandrol Asia-Pacific
Development of a simple prediction model for slab track vibration using field measurements Steve Barlow Pandrol Asia-Pacific

2 Scope of study Consider only concrete slab track.
Consider only vibration, not noise. Consider only the vibration measured on slab adjacent to rail fastener. Do not consider vibration transmission through or from structure Hence, only concerned with the performance of the fastener itself.

3 PART 1 What is Slab Track?

4 Cast-in baseplates

5 Pre-cast block track

6 Embedded sleeper (1)

7 Embedded sleeper (1)

8 Embedded sleeper (2)

9 Embedded sleeper (2)

10 Plinth track

11 RHEDA track

12 J-slab

13 Precast FST slab track

14 Embedded Rail

15 What are we trying to achieve with slab track?
Reduce the space taken by trackform, particularly in tunnels Reduce maintenance liabilities Keep costs down Reduce the track stiffness

16 Low stiffness rail fasteners
PART 2 Low stiffness rail fasteners

17 Reducing track stiffness – why?
Want to reduce ground borne vibration (a.k.a.structural noise) Theory tells us to either: 1. Increase mass (e.g. FST) 2. Reduce track stiffness

18 Options for lowering slab track stiffness

19 Conventional baseplate
Rail foot fastened by steel spring clips Vertical stiffness limited by rail roll (typically 15 to 20kN/mm static) Typically 2.5mm maximum vertical deflection

20 Conventional resilient baseplate with spring clips

21 Low stiffness baseplate
Supports and clamps rail by the web Low vertical stiffness (typically 3 to 5kN/mm static) Vertical rail deflection up to 6mm typical Straight swap for existing baseplate in most cases

22 Low stiffness baseplate clamping rail by the web

23 Description of field measurement locations
PART 3 Description of field measurement locations

24 Location 1 Hong Kong MTRC Plain slab at grade Installed January 2002
Straight swap for existing soft fasteners 7.4dB insertion loss measured on slab

25 Location 2 Hong Kong Airport Railway Viaduct on 300 metre radius curve
Fitted January 2004 Retrofit to replace existing ‘soft’ baseplate 8.2dB insertion loss and 5dB(A) less secondary noise beneath viaduct

26 Location 3 London Underground – Victoria Line
Retrofit to slab track Cast-in sleeper version Operational since March 2000 Gives 16.2 dB insertion loss on slab More than 125MGT traffic since operations began

27 Location 4 Madrid Metro Line 11 Installed August 2001
Replacement of existing stiff fastener on booted block 23.1dB insertion loss recorded on slab

28 Location 5 Guangzhou Metro China, Line 1 Installed 2005
345m radius curve and tangent Retrofit for stiff fastener 11.5dB insertion loss on slab

29 Swapping over baseplates
PART 4 Swapping over baseplates

30 Swapping over baseplates
Raise rail temporarily Remove old baseplate Use other rail as datum Position new baseplate

31 Swapping over baseplates
Low stiffness baseplates positioned Clamping tool used to fasten rail Once alignment is set, start work on other rail

32 Swapping over baseplates
Both rails clamped and aligned Take ‘after’ vibration recordings immediately

33 Taking vibration readings
PART 5 Taking vibration readings

34 Measuring vibration Multiple train passes for each case
Train speed constant Time lapse between before and after measurements minimised Same recording and reporting method used in all cases

35 Taking slab vibration readings
Accelerometers screwed to steel plates, bonded to slab Positioned close to rail foot at mid-span where possible Data recorded and processed in the same way every time

36 Factors affecting vibration results
Rail condition and geometry Wheel condition Train speed Local conditions Track structure

37 PART 6 Vibration results

38

39

40

41

42

43 Change in static stiffness of rail fastener
Units Location reference 1 2 3 4 5 Static secant stiffness before (Ks1) kN/mm 21 133 130 52.1 Static secant stiffness after (Ks2) 5.1 Stiffness change (Ks1/Ks2) 5.25 26.1 32.5 13.0 Insertion loss (total vibration) (dB) 7.4 8.2 16.2 23.1 11.5

44

45 ~15dB insertion loss change per tenfold static stiffness change

46 Steve Barlow Pandrol Asia-Pacific scb@pandrolasia.com
END Steve Barlow Pandrol Asia-Pacific


Download ppt "Steve Barlow Pandrol Asia-Pacific"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google