Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEugene Daniels Modified over 7 years ago
1
Cleaning, Maintenance & Sterilization in Laparoscopic Surgery
2
What is minimum in sterilisation ??
Can we compromise in instrument sterility ??? If so to what an extent ??? What is the effect ???
3
Stresilisation/ Disinfection / Decontamination
Sterilisation - A process that destroys or eliminates all forms of microbial life Disinfection - A process that eliminates many or all pathogenic microorganisms, except bacterial spores, on inanimate objects Decontamination – Removal of all pathogenic micro-organism from object to make them safe to handle / use / discard
4
Sterile Critical Semi-Critical Non-Critical
CRITICAL - objects which enter normally sterile tissue or the vascular system or through which blood flows should be sterile. SEMI CRITICAL - objects that touch mucous membranes or skin that is not intact require a disinfection process (high-level disinfection [HLD]) that kills all microorganisms but high numbers of bacterial spores. NON CRITICAL - objects that touch only intact skin require low-level disinfection (or non-germicidal detergent). Sterile HLD ILD LLD Decontamination Critical Semi-Critical Non-Critical
5
Laparoscopic Instruments sterilization – what is minimum?
CDC guideline 2008 Although sterilization is preferred, no reports have been published of outbreaks resulting from high-level disinfection, when they are properly cleaned and high-level disinfected. High level disinfection for HBV, HCV, HIV or TB contaminated devices Membership survey : 10,000 Laparoscopic Gynecological procedures with High level disinfection Infection rate < 0.3% Put the ref. Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008 , William A. Rutala et al and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC)3
6
Decontamination It’s a combination of procedures used to make a reusable item safe for further use by staffs on patient’s by reducing bio burden. It has to be performed before disinfection/sterilization Use Inspect Transport Disinfect Clean Storage Sterilization Pack
7
Laparoscopic instruments
Complex in design and delicate in construction Blood & tissue enter into the channels Problems Lodging of bioburden in the crevices Gentlest methods need to be used for cleaning and sterilization
8
Cleaning path On table – wipe / keep in water bowls
Running water – decrease the organic load (+ve pressure due to CO2 drives blood & debris into channels) Dismantle & clean the channels Dip in detergent & enzymes solution Clean the channel, joints & serrations Brush (preferably Nylon) / water jet Ultrasound cleaner Drying
9
Substances harmful for Instruments
Saline Bleaching powder Iodine based preparations Abrasive cleaners- Vim powder etc Laundry detergents Surgeon’s hand scrub Soap
10
DISINFECTION – Removes and / or Kills the pathogenic micro organisms (SPORES NOT KILLED)
Low Reduces overall number of veg micro organism Does not destroy TB bacilli spores Application – OT table, floor etc. Intermediate Kills TB bacilli, most virus, & fungi but only some spores Application – OPD, where breach of skin / mucosa is not there High Kills most forms of microbial life including TB bacilli & most of the spores Application – scopes delicate instruments etc. in minor surgical procedures
11
Methods of Disinfection
Low temperature steam – 73oC x 20 mins Boiling water – 100oC x 5 mins Formaldehyde – air tight chamber at 50oC x ? Glutaraldehyde 2% - effective against most bacteria, virus including hepatitis B & C / HIV. Cidex solution ( 2.4% alkaline glutaraldehyde) provides high level disinfection in 20 – 45 mins. Ortho phthalaldehyde 0.55% (OPA) 12 mins soak time at room temp.
12
Chemical Disinfectants
Gluteraldehyde Paracetic acid Destroys microorganisms by alkylation of amino acids Efficient bactericidal, fungicidal & virucidal activity but slow myco-bactericital activity (> 40 min) Once activated shelf life -14 days Contact time High level disinfection 20 – 90min Sterilization 6 – 10 hrs Denatures protein & destroy cell membrane 30 min cycle Byproducts – are non toxic (Acetic acid, water, oxygen) Maximum reuse period is 14 days Effective in presence of organic matter & at low temperatures Has an additional Tuberculocidal activity
13
Chemical Disinfectants
Ortho-phthalaldehyde(OPA) % 1, 2-benzenedicarboxaldehyde (OPA) Mode of Action interact with amino acids, proteins & micro-organisms. Superior mycobactericidal activity as compared to that of gluteraldehyde Advantage More stable OPA was effective over a 14-day use cycle Less irritant to eyes Disadvantage - Stains proteins gray (including unprotected skin) Soak time - 12 mins
14
Chemical Disinfectants
Hydrogen Peroxide - Bactericidal, virucidal, sporicidal & fungicidal properties Mode of Action – Hydroxyl free radicals that can attack membrane lipids, DNA, and other essential cell components. Accelerated hydrogen peroxide(0.5%) --- kills viruses in 1 minute and Mycobacteria and fungi in 5 minutes.
15
Chemical Disinfectants
PERASAFE 0.08% Peracetic acid plus 1.0% hydrogen peroxide Mode of action - De natures protein and destroys cell membrane Advantage - Effectively inactivates Mycobacteria resistant to glutaraldehyde Soak time - 10 mins
16
Factors affecting efficacy of disinfection & sterilisation
Number and Location of Microorganisms Innate Resistance of Microorganisms Concentration and Potency of Disinfectants Physical and Chemical Factors [temperature, pH, relative humidity, and water hardness ] Organic and Inorganic Matter Prior cleaning Moisture Direct contact with the items Duration of Exposure Temperature Chemical test strips should be used after every 10th cycle
17
Safe use of chemical disinfectant
Check efficacy before use Use sterilized stainless steel tray for cidex Avoid using plastic tray for cidex Thoroughly clean & dry the instruments before putting in cidex water on instrument changes the pH of cidex Allow cidex to drip back into the tray Use gloved hands to pick up the instruments Lifter should not touch the tray wall (Un sterile!!) Rinse instruments thoroughly in sterile water (at least 3 times) Sterilize the sterile water tray! Dry all the instruments before use
18
Don’t Do This
19
Sterilization ע - Irradiation (for industrial use)
Kills all forms of microbial life including bacteria / virus / fungi / spores Techniques Steam 121oC x 15 mins at 15 psi Low temperature steam (73oC)+ formaldehyde Heat sensitive instruments Not very popular Hot air Inefficient – good only for grease / ointment, oil etc. ETO Heat sensitive instruments(Make sure no soiled instrument Paracetic acid Denatures protein Destroy cell membrane 50-56oC x 12 mins Kills spores ע - Irradiation (for industrial use)
20
Moist Heat (Autoclave)
Moist heat under pressure Routinely 121oC for 15 – 30 min Flash autoclave 132oC 3 min nonporous items 10mins porous items 4 min for nonporous items 4 mins for porous items Quick penetration in material Unaffected by presence of organic matter For linens, metallic instruments, glass, fluids, plastics In Gravity dependent autoclaves In Pre-vaccum autoclaves
21
Dry Sterilization Same advantages as that of wet
Temperature range 1210C to 1710C Disadvantage Cycle time is longer 16 hrs at 1210C, 1 hr at 1710C Load capacity is smaller
22
Monitoring Bowie – Davies Tape Biological Indicators
Bacillus stearothermophilus spores for steam autoclaves Bacillus subtilis spores for dry heat sterilizers
23
Ethylene Oxide Useful for wide diversity of medical devices, eg. Plastics, rubbers, endoscopes, instruments, fluids etc. Alkylates N-positions of Guanine in DNA directly Disadvantages : Carcinogenic & Mutagenic Chronic & acute toxicity syndromes Standard ETO cycle 285 mins + aeration time – 8 to 24 hrs Occupational hazard to workers & environment Monitoring with B subtilis spores So necessary aeration period of 8 to 24 hours
24
Low Temperature Steam with Gaseous Formaldehyde
An alternative to ETO But Formaldehyde itself is Toxic & Carcinogenic Combination of gaseous Formaldehyde saturated steam at 650C Suitable for heat-labile material eg (moss plastics, non flexible endoscopes & equipments) B. Subtilis Monitoring By spores B. stearothermophilies
25
Gas Plasma Sterilization (Sterrad)
For temperature & moisture sensitive materials Mechanism H2O2 vapours + strong electric field applied H2O2 in plasma state Hydroxyl & Hydro-peroxy free radicles Disrupts cell membranes, enzymes & Nuclic acids Cell Death Electric field turned off Activated compounds recombine to form H2O + O2
26
Gas Plasma Sterilization
Advantage No toxic by-products Cycle time 55 to 75 min No aeration period instruments immediately ready for use Disadvantage Not for linens, powders & liquids Approved for use on Stainless steel devices with lumen > 3mm diameter & length < 40 cm Metal & plastic instruments with lumen > 6mm diameter & length < 31 cm Cycle turns off if slightest moisture Expensive – Both Equipment and running
27
Formalin Chamber - The Bane of Laparoscopy
Size used: 9” x 9” x 20” Tablets: 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14….??? Minimum exposure time: 24 hour Ganjawala D, Shah M, Zaveri D. Efficacy of formalin chamber for disinfection of instruments Presented to Western India Regional Orthopedic Conference, 2000
28
Formalin Chamber - The Bane of Laparoscopy
No Standardization How much leak Chamber- How many times opened in 24hrs How many tablets Exposure – How many minutes Temperature Don’t shove instruments in a chamber and hop from one hospital to another
29
How Good Is Formalin Chamber ?
Number of Tablets 4 6 8 10 12 14 Vegetative forms - Streaked petridish Dried soiled instrument Spores (Clostridia) No Effect No Effect Ganjawala D, Shah M, Zaveri D. Efficacy of formalin chamber for disinfection of instruments Presented to Western India Regional Orthopedic Conference, 2000
30
Right place for this
31
Autoclave / flash autoclave
Cidex Parasafe ETO Gas plasma Formalin chamber Sterile sleeve Camera x ++ +++ + Light cable Telescope Tubings / diathermy harmonic scalpel cable Heat sensitive hand instruments Heat resistant hand instruments Trocars
32
J Hosp Infect Aug; 45(4):263-77 Decontamination of minimally invasive surgical endoscopes and accessories Ayliffe G; Minimal Access Therapy Decontamination Working Group Heat tolerant endoscopes and accessories - Steam sterilization is the first choice Heat sensitive endoscopes and accessories - ETO / gas plasma / low temp. steam + formaldehyde Insufficient instruments / time to sterilize - Immersion in 2% glutaraldehyde - At least 25 min - > 25 min if mycobacterial infection suspected - At least 4 hrs required to kill spores
33
Ideal disinfectant – Search is on
34
Reuse of disposable instruments
Issues for and against reuse Does it affect procedural outcomes? Can disposable instruments be ever cleaned / sterilized adequately?
35
What the literature says?
Reuse of Disposable Laparoscopic Instruments What the literature says? “reusing Disposable Laparoscopic Instrument did not change the operative and postoperative outcomes or the infection rate” Efficacy and safety of reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study, Colak T, Ersoz G, Akca T, Kanik A, Aydin S; Surg Endosc Aug;18(8):1161-2 “None of the patients had infection at the wound site or intra-abdominally” High-level disinfection with 2% alkalinized glutaraldehyde solution for reuse of laparoscopic disposable plastic trocars, Gundogdu H, Ocal K, Caglikulekci M, Karabiber N, Bayramoghu E, Karahan M, J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A Feb; 9(1): 117-8 “disposable laparoscopic instruments with a relatively complex structure is not effective and may result in nosocomial disease transmission” Is it possible to resterilize disposable laparoscopy trocars in a hospital setting?, Ulualp KM, Hazaoglu I, Ulgen SK, Sahin DA, Saribas S, Ozturk R, Cebeci H, Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech Oct;10(5):340-1
39
Minimal Access Surgery
Aim is less morbidity & good cosmesis Not this
40
Nosocomial Tubercular infection – a totally avoidable situation
Infect Control Hosp. Epidemiol, 2001 Aug22(8):474-5 Nosocomial Mycobacterium chelonae infection in laparoscopic surgery. Rodrigues C, Mehta A, Jha U, Bharucha M, Dastur FD, Udwadia TE Indian J Gastroenterol Nov-Dec;20(6):247-8 Port-site infection with Mycobacterium chelonei following laparoscopic appendicectomy Bhandarkar DS, Bhagwat S, Punjani R Scand J Infect Dis. 2002;34(12):928-9 Port-site tuberculosis: a rare compliction following laparoscopic cholecystectomy Jagdish N, Sameer R, Omprakash R. Surg Endosc Jun;17(6):930-2 Epub 2003 Mar 07. Port-site tuberculosis after laparoscopy: report of eight cases Ramesh H, Prakash K, Lekha V, Jacob G, Venugopal A, Venugopal B A whopping cost of Rs. 23,800 per nosocomial non-tubercular infection (Baroda 1999)
41
Sterilization of Lap Instruments
What is right? Are we doing it right? Consequences of not doing it right How can we do it right?
42
> 350 surgeons from around the country
- Audience poll with electronic keypads MAS – Status in India October 2002, Mumbai
43
MAS – Status in India October 2002, Mumbai
44
Conclusions Thorough cleaning is an important primary step
Essential to follow rigid protocols for instrument cleaning and sterilization Only well-established methods of sterilization / high level disinfection should be used Some current practices should be abolished - formalin chambers - reuse of disposable instruments It is necessary to establish stringent regulations for the instrument manufacturers
45
Food for thought How many of us would allow either of these
instrument sets to be used if we were undergoing an open cholecystectomy?
46
Thank you
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.