Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Preferences for Coral Reef and Fishery Management in Okinawa, Japan

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Preferences for Coral Reef and Fishery Management in Okinawa, Japan"— Presentation transcript:

1 Preferences for Coral Reef and Fishery Management in Okinawa, Japan
Presenting Author: Nils Carlson, Colby College Introduction Coral Reef Valuation Study at Hanauma Bay in Hawaii showed that visitors there are willing to pay much more for their experience ($10) than they are currently doing. Consumer surplus is even larger if they know this payment is going towards conservation ($12.50) Using a 50 year time period and a 3% discount rate, that the average annual value of the coral reef ecosystem in Hawaii is $364 million. This leads to a net present value of nearly $10 billion. Using the travel cost method, discounting at a 4% interest rate, the recreational value of the Great Barrier Reef is worth from US $18 to $40 billion. Coral Reefs Coral reefs are among the most productive and biologically diverse ecosystems on Earth. They supply vast numbers of people with goods and services such as seafood, recreational possibilities, costal protection and aesthetic and cultural benefits. Coral reef cover ranges from % of the ocean floor but hold almost 1/3 of the world’s marine fish species Many coral reefs are in serious decline: This is particularly true for reefs near embayments or near shallow shelves in densely populated areas. To secure the capacity of coral reefs to supply humanity with ecological goods and services the resilience of reefs must be conserved. Loss of resilience is caused by unsustainable uses of the reef itself as well as unwise and inefficient fisheries management Human impacts on coral reefs can also have far reaching consequences on adjacent ecosystems Conclusions Methods A choice experiment survey. The attributes of the choice experiment were the following: Leisure fish Catch, Coral coverage and Marine Biodiversity and Shoreline and Costal Conditions. The respondents were either residents of Okinawa or Tourists. There were two versions of the survey: “Top-down” or “Bottom- up.” Main effects specification: Vqi=β1Xfish_catch+β2Xcoral_coverage+β3Xcostal_condition+β4Xpa yment+εi Results Individual heterogeneity is significant in the MMNL setting for each attribute. For each model, the conservation attributes fish-catch and coral_coverage have positive and significant coefficients; both of these attributes increase individual utility and should be considered in conservation planning and research. The attributes costal_condition and payment are both significant and negative; individuals prefer the coast to be less developed and more intact and they also prefer inexpensive restoration projects. The level of the ASC tells us that respondents generally liked the program presented in the survey. Respondents are, on average, willing to pay between ¥137.0 and ¥148.4 per month for a 10% increase in the amount of fish available for catch in ten years. Respondents are willing to pay between ¥274.8 and ¥301.0 per month for a 10% increase in the extent and health of marine biodiversity in the Okinawan waters. Tourists of Okinawa are willing to pay, on average close to ¥30 higher per month for a 10% increase in the extent and health of marine biodiversity in the Okinawan waters than are residents. Main Effects Estimation Results CL W/Out ASC MMNL W/Out ASC CL W/ ASC MMNL W/ ASC fish_catch 0.0192*** 0.0381*** ** ** ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) coral_coverage 0.0395*** 0.0668*** 0.0233*** 0.0479*** ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) costal_conditions *** *** *** *** ( ) ( ) payment *** *** *** *** ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ASC 1.290*** 8.301*** (0.0518) (0.477) Observations 25473 Attribute Descriptions & Levels: Description Future Possible Levels in 10 Years The average amount of fish catch available during a recreational fishing trip after 10 years. With protected areas: 20-30% more fish catch 10-20% more fish catch Current conditions remain \Without protected areas: 20-30% less fish catch The extent and health of the coral reefs and the number of marine biodiversity found in the Okinawan waters after 10 years. 20-30% more coral coverage and biodiversity 10-20% more coral coverage and biodiversity Without protected areas: 20-30% less coral coverage and biodiversity The extent of coastal development that includes beachfront construction of homes, hotels, restaurants and roads near or on coastal areas and the condition of the beach and shoreline after 10 years. 20-30% less development with more intact coastal shorelines 10-20% less development and moderately intact coastal shoreline 20-30% more development with degraded shoreline A monthly contribution will be collected from all Okinawan residents to support the management of these protected areas. 100 yen per month 200 yen per month 400 yen per month 600 yen per month 800 yen per month 1000 yen per month Zero Standard Errors in Parentheses: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 WTP Values for Model, Controlling for Treatment WTP – Resident WTP – Tourist fish_catch 13.70*** 14.84*** (1.418) (2.360) coral_coverage 27.48*** 30.10*** (1.353) (2.239) costal_conditions -18.70*** -24.86*** (1.449) (2.916) Observations 17,304 8,169 Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge the support and efforts of Sahan Dissanayake, Colby College


Download ppt "Preferences for Coral Reef and Fishery Management in Okinawa, Japan"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google