1. STUDY TITLE Presenter Name Presenter Title Duty Location
Date of Presentation

2. Briefing Purpose Confirm the Tentatively Selected Plan.
Discuss significant public, technical, and policy comments and their resolution.
Discuss significant risks being carried forward in the study
Confirms a willing non-Federal sponsor
Request Panel endorsement of the TSP.
Request feedback and guidance on path forward
Request approval to proceed to feasibility level design.
This will be a standard slide in the presention

3. Study Authorities
List date and blurb of study authority that defines mission area and scope.
This should be very brief

4. Authorized Study Area
Insert Map
This should be very brief

5. Problems/Objectives/Constraints
Focus on problems that are unique to the study and show that the study has Federal Interest
Clear, measurable objectives
Constraints unique to this study/study area
This should be very brief and use a map/visual to tell this story. Could use map from Slide 4.

6. Final Array of Alternatives
Distinctly different alternatives
Risks inherent in each alternative
Potential impacts
Major qualitative and quantitative metrics used for trade off analysis
This should be very brief and use a map/visual to tell this story. Could use map from Slide 4.

7. Tentatively Selected Plan
Key features of the TSP
Trade-offs between benefits, environmental impacts, costs, policy, legal issues, and sponsor capability that led to selection
This should be very brief and use a map/visual to tell this story.

8. Significant Comments ATR/IEPR/Policy/ Public
Only discuss SIGNIFICANT comments that have changed the TSP since the TSP milestone or have high risk when moving forward in the study
The bulk of the district presentation should focus on the risks and uncertainties associated with the significant comments, and how the district altered the TSP based on these

9. MSC Quality Assurance
MSC confirms that they have done their QA role throughout the study process
ATR and IEPR leads can add input here if they deem it necessary

10. Sponsor Views
Sponsor may send District a statement to enter here, and this is the time for them to speak of few words of their support of the TSP (whether that is NED or LPP)

11. HQ Policy Review
Recap of significant Policy and Legal Review comments and recommendations
The OWPR review manager will send these slide to the RIT

12. Risk Register Highlights Confirming the TSP
This reflects the Risk Register summary submitted as a read ahead with issues that have not been covered by other slides
Significant Risk Register items added because of review comments that have changed the TSP or are high risks
Major part of presentation

13. Risk Register Highlights Path Forward for TSP Refinement
Risks being carried forward into feasibility level design
How will the PDT move from TSP to final report / recommendation?
This slide is the MOST important part of the presentation. What risks are you carrying forward and what are you doing about them? This should draw on the Risk Register summary read ahead.
Modeling, Cost certification, mitigation plan, etc…
What does the Sponsor need to do to complete?

14. Feasibility Level Design Remaining Funds Available
Show what can be done within the study constraints (3x3x3) and risks associated with that. Can this study be finished with current funding?

15. Why were these the milestones on this slide?
Project Schedule
Why were these the milestones on this slide?
TSP Milestone
ATR/IEPR/Public/Policy Review
Agency Decision Milestone
Final Report Milestone
CWRB
State and Agency Review
Chief’s Report
Milestone
Date (or Projected Date)
Feasibility Cost Share Agreement Signed
Alternatives Milestone
Tentatively Selected Plan Milestone
Agency Decision Milestone
Civil Works Review Board
Chief’s Report
What are the risks associated with this current schedule?
Can this study be finished with current funding?
What are the major risks associated with schedule and funding to completion?

16. Applied Lessons Learned
Lessons learned from previous studies
Lessons learned during this study

17. Discussion and Decision