1. Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana - Gramin
Meeting with Principal Secretaries / Secretaries
22nd April, 2017

2. PMAY-G
PRC – January 2017

3. Points of Discussion 1 PMAY-G 2 3 4 PMAY-G – Target, State Share
Performance under PMAY-G 2
Mason Training 3
House Design Typologies 4
Meeting with States

4. Annual PMAY-G Physical Target1
Year
Target (nos.)
44,00,000
33,00,000
23,00,000
Total
1,00,00,000
Meeting with States

5. Annual Financial Implication1
Year
Target
Total 1.25 lakh
Central Share (63% of total cost)
State Share
(37% of total cost) 1 2 3 4 5 FY
Nos.
In Crores
44,00,000
55,000
34,650
20,350
2017 – 18
33,00,000
41,250
25,987
15,263
2018 – 19
23,00,000
28,750
18,113
10,457
Total
1,00,00,000
1,25,000
78,750
46,250
Additionally, nearly Rs. 30,000 crore would be available through convergence with MGNREGA in three years.
Meeting with States

6. Release of State Matching Share1
States which are yet to be release State matching share for as per AwaasSoft.
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Maharashtra
Manipur
Mizoram
Meghalaya
Nagaland
Odisha
Punjab
Sikkim
Rajasthan
Uttar Pradesh (partially released)
Telangana
Meeting with States

7. Sanction of house to Beneficiaries2
Mapping of villages & SECC data verification by Gram Sabha
Target Setting By States
Registration
Uploading of geo-tagged photographs using AwaasApp
Mobile No
Bank A/c N
Aadhaar No.
Existing dwelling unit
Site for construction
SANCTION
Meeting with States

8. Mapping of Villages with SECC Data2
Unmapped Villages with SECC Data vs Total Villages with SECC Data
States with unmapped SECC villages
Meeting with States
** As on 18/04/2017 from AwaasSoft

9. Identification and Selection of Beneficiaries2
Process Flow
Progress 1
Circulation of GP wise list of eligible beneficiaries
Target Date for Finalising Permanent Waitlist
15/July/2016 2
Verification of Lists by Gram Sabha
Universe for PMAY-G is 4.03 crore households, identified through Socio Economic Caste Census (SECC), 2011 data.
After verification of 3.92 crore households by Gram Sabha and review by Appellate Authority, 2.39 crore beneficiaries have been identified to be eligible to receive assistance under PMAY-G. 3
Constitution of Appellate Committee 4
Resolution of Grievances by Appellate Committee 5
Uploading and Publication of Permanent Wait list on AwaasSoft
PRC – July 2016

10. Household Verification by Gram Sabhas2
Percentage of households verified using SECC 2011
More than 70 % %
30 – 50 %
Upto 30 %
Arunachal Pradesh, Goa, Karnataka and Telangana are yet to start verification of households from the SECC list

11. Targets fixed by States2
Target set by State vs MoRD Target
States with 100% Targets set
States having less than 100% Targets set
Chattisgarh
Gujarat
Himachal Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Kerala
Meghalaya
Punjab
Tamil Nadu
Rajasthan
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
Karnataka
Meeting with States
** As on 18/04/2017 from AwaasSoft

12. Registrations Completed by States2
Beneficiaries Registered vs MoRD Target
States with over 60% Registration
Progress of Remaining States on Registrations
Rajasthan
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Chattisgarh
West Bengal
Odisha
Himachal Pradesh
Jharkhand
Uttarakhand
Gujarat
Uttar Pradesh
Kerala
Haryana
Meeting with States
** As on 18/04/2017 from AwaasSoft

13. Beneficiaries Geo-tagged vis-a-vis MoRD Target
Status of Geo-tagging 2
Beneficiaries Geo-tagged vis-a-vis MoRD Target
More than 90 % %
50 – 70 %
Upto 50 %

14. Houses Sanctioned 2 ** As on 18/04/2017 from AwaasSoft
Houses Sanctioned vs MoRD Target
States with over 70% Houses Sanctioned
States with Less Than 70% Houses Sanctioned
Himachal Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
West Bengal
Rajasthan
Odisha
Maharashtra
Chattisgarh
Jharkhand
Meeting with States
** As on 18/04/2017 from AwaasSoft

15. 1st Instalment Paid 2
Percentage of beneficiaries receiving 1st instalment vis-a-vis MoRD Target
More than 50 % %
10 – 30 %
Upto 10 %

16. Program Management Unit in States2
Suggested constitution
State
State Nodal officer
Technical Expert in the field of construction of house
Expert to look after IT/MIS/PFMS
Expert to look after all the Financial matters
Social Mobilisation expert and Training Coordinator
District
Coordinator for all the activities of PMAY-G at District
IT Personnel
Training Coordinator
Block
Coordinator for all the activities of PMAY at Block & Village level
Every house of PMAY-G to be tagged to village level functionary.
Maharashtra and Jharkhand 1
State level PMU to be setup
At State Level 2
PMU at all levels -UP, Bihar, Kerala and Haryana,
State and District Level in Tripura
District PMUs to be setup 3
Block / Block level Panchayat PMUs to be setup
Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Karnataka 4
Have dedicated organizations, viz. Housing Corporations, which look into all the aspects of rural housing
Every PMAY-G house to be tagged to a village functionary to monitor completion
PRC – July 2016

17. 1 2 3 4 5 Mason Training 3 Process Flow Time lines agreed to in 2016
Engaging a Training Provider in consultation with CSDCI
2nd week of July,
Engagement of Training Providers in coordination with CSDCI
3rd week of July
Start ToT
4th week of July
Start Pilot Mason training 2
Training of trainer 3
Pilot training of mason 4
Pilot trainings taken up in
Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Uttarakhand, Gujarat, Rajasthan and Maharashtra
Scaling up training for the State 5
Assessment and certification of masons
PRC – July 2016

18. Mason Training 3 40,000 Masons by June 2017 TARGET
Target Under Mason Training
State
Masons to be trained by June, 2017
Maharashtra
20000
Madhya Pradesh
10000
Rajasthan
8000
Andhra Pradesh
6500
Chhattisgarh
5000
Jharkhand UP
Total
70100
State
Masons to be trained by June, 2017
Bihar
3000
West Bengal
Assam
2000
Uttarakhand
1200
Tripura
900
Sikkim
500
Meeting with States

19. Mason Training 3
Rs. 15 Lakhs has been released to 21 States for conducting pilot training of masons.
The pilot training of masons had been conducted in the States of Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Uttarakhand, Gujarat, Rajasthan and Maharashtra.
The remaining states to conduct pilot training .
All states to scale up training for the entire state based on experiences in the pilot.
States may submit proposal for gap funding for organizing training with sufficient justification.
Meeting with States

20. Housing Design Typologies4
Process Flow
Progress 1
Typology study
Studies to be conducted in 34 States/UTs
Studies in 18 States already taken up
Remaining 16 to be taken up this year 2
18 States
UNDP – 13
IIT Delhi - 5
Preliminary design type
Typology studies conducted in 3
Presentation to Ministry
House Design Typologies have been finalized in 14 States (Assam, Chhattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Odisha, Rajasthan, Tripura, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Mizoram, Sikkim, Uttarakhand) 4
State consultation
State consultations remaining in 4 States
Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Jammu & Kashmir
State consultations remaining in 10 States . 5
Final design 6
Demo houses taken up in
Tripura And Maharashtra
Demo building
PRC – July 2016

21. House Design Typologies4
Compendium of House Design Typologies released by Honorable PM
Activities Required at the STATES’ End 1
Construction of Demo Houses 2
Incorporation of Alternate Technologies in SOR 3
Wide publicity to Designs among Beneficiaries
Meeting with States

22. House Design Typologies4
Progress Tracker
State/Activity
Typology study
Preliminary design type
Presentation to Ministry
State consultation
Final design
Demo building
Development of state-level upscaling plan 1
Madhya Pradesh 2
Manipur 3
Sikkim 4
Uttar Pradesh 5
West Bengal 6
Bihar 7
Uttarakhand 8
Himachal Pradesh 9
Mizoram 10
Jammu & Kashmir 11
Chhattisgarh 12
Jharkhand 13
Assam 14
Odisha 15
Rajasthan 16
Meghalaya 17
Maharashtra 18
Tripura
Meeting with States

23. Challenges and policy issues
Identification – Mapping of revenue villages to SECC village, beneficiaries to villages, deletion of ineligibe households, addition of eligible households left out of list, wrong capturing of category in SECC, Addressing of grievances through Appellate Mechanism.
Land to landless
PFMS – Bank account verification, tracking of FTOs, Pending transfer of assistance, False success / reject cases.
Mason Training – Identification of Training Provider, Conduct of pilot training, scaling of training, linking of trained masons to the beneficiaries.

24. Challenges and policy issues
Quality – Ensuring quality in construction of house, availability of material at reasonable rates, use of locally available materials
Awareness to beneficiaries – about the scheme, eligibility, house designs, quality construction material, loan to willing beneficiaries.
Monitoring – Setting up of PMU at different levels, Geo-tagging, disposal of grievances
House designs – Identification, construction of demo houses, Penetration / adoption of identified house designs

25. IAY
PRC – January 2017

26. Points of Discussion IAY 1
Completion of incomplete IAY Houses in
1.1
States with Higher Completion Rates
1.2
States with High incomplete houses
PRC 2017: PMAY-G

27. IAY Progress in FY 2016-17 * Total Incomplete Houses 36,39,368
States with Highest completion in
States with Largest number of incomplete houses as on
Bihar – 5.76 lakhs
Bihar Lakhs
* Total Incomplete Houses
36,39,368
UP lakhs
Maharashtra – Lakhs
* As on 1/4/2016
WB lakhs
Assam – 1.44 Lakhs
* Total Houses Completed
25,42,648
* As on 21/04/2017
From AwaasSoft
MP lakhs
Karnataka – 1.06 Lakhs
Assam lakh
Rajasthan – 0.96 Lakhs
Houses Completed as per reports of States (status to be updated on AwaasSoft as these could not be uploaded due to IT/Network issues.)
32,14,506
Jharkhand lakh
Gujarat – 0.66 Lakhs
Meeting with States

28. % Completed IAY Houses (As on 20.04.2017)
Houses Completed vs Houses Sanctioned from
More than 90 % %
50 – 70 %
Upto 50 %

29. % Incomplete IAY Houses (20.04.2017)
Incomplete Houses Remaining vs Houses Sanctioned from
More than 70 %
40 – 70 %
20 – 40 %
Upto 20 %

30. Thank you…