Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Dr. N Sarat Chandra Babu/ C-DAC Bangalore

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Dr. N Sarat Chandra Babu/ C-DAC Bangalore"— Presentation transcript:

1 Dr. N Sarat Chandra Babu/ C-DAC Bangalore
IOT STANDARDS Dr. N Sarat Chandra Babu/ C-DAC Bangalore 14th September 2017

2 Need & Urgency of IOT Standards
IOT aims to connect various things around us to the Internet with the use of smart sensors and actuators IOT devices have limited resources in terms of power, processing capabilities, bandwidth etc. Existing set of protocols were not designed for such constraints Gartner Inc. forecasts that the total number of connected things will reach 20.4 billion by 2020 Need of a standards based layered architecture and protocol suite considering the huge scale of implementation and influence on public life

3 Challenges Customers would be bound to one vendor for the entire end to end solution Operational quality may not be uniform Systems might not work as expected Interoperability issues- incompatible with other solutions Scalability is a challenge Technology reuse and modularity Ease of Innovation Development of entire end to end solution- lesser competition, monopolization of market and higher cost of the product

4 The IOT Standards Environment
Standards Creation reflects business opportunities; this race is about IoT monetization creating the potential for market transformation Formal Standards in all 5 Sectors are creating End to End (E2E) IoT Architecture Frameworks to address the connection of Things Communications Governments OIC < > UPnP < >Allseen < > IETF < > W3C < > 3GPP < > OMA < > oneM2M < > AIoTI < > IIC < > Ind 4.0 IEEE P < > ETSI < > IoT China < > NIST < > ISO/IEC JTC1 < > IoT Enterprise (IT) Industrial (OT) The end-customer is probably not a person but an entity, thing, or a system. A new type of marketplace will emerge creating these new businesses Standards harmonization will even become very difficult if not impossible Consumer A single IoT Standard is not achievable given the market dynamics and business opportunities Ref: IoT Standards The Next Generation by Jeff Fedders Chief Strategist- Intel Corporation

5 IOT Standards and Strategies
Interoperability required to capture 40% of total value Mckinsey Report 2015 50 Billion devices by 2020 – Is it happening? Presently it’s growing at a slow phase and at an Inflection point exponential growth is possible only when we have Interoperability; Otherwise difficult to reach the anticipated target by 2020 Are unified standards possible? Competing standards – Survival is the fittest Many Standard organizations and more than 100 standards – New Standards still keep coming to meet the changing communication technologies; services and so on Viable standards: Must address widely held concerns of people (For example USB has become popular standard as it addressed fundamental need of transporting data) Right standards for right purposes: Say Medical, Transportation, Power, … Best Practices and guidelines

6 IOT Standards – The Trend

7 IOT Standards: International Scenario
Organizations Committees/Working Group Efforts AllSeen Alliance >170 members - Qualcomm, Cisco Systems, Panasonic An open-source framework for service & connectivity layer- build around AllJoyn protocol Open Interconnect Consortium >300 members - Intel, Samsung Electronics, Dell, HP, Lenovo framework which enable interoperability of IOT devices- IOTivity project AllSeen merged into it OneM2M 8 standardization organizations, 6 industry consortia Defines an IOT service layer - middleware Thread Group >170 members - ARM Holdings, Samsung, and Google’s Nest Labs Promoting a mesh networking protocol standard for low-power devices around homes Liaison agreement with ZigBee IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) IEEE P2413 To turn the information from different IOT platforms into commonly understood data objects ISO/IEC (International Organization for Standardization/ International Electrotechnical Commission) ISO/IEC JTC 1 (Joint Technical Committee) Develop standards for IOT & facilitate coordination between JTC 1 and other organizations like IEEE, ITU etc. ITU (International Telecommunication Union) SG20 (Study Group) For development of technical standards enabling the Internet of Things on a global scale Industrial Internet Consortium >250 members - General Electric, Cisco Systems, IBM, Intel and AT&T foster coordination among industries where IOT and older M2M technologies

8 IOT STANDARDS: NATIONAL SCENARIO
Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), GoI released its draft IOT policy in Focuses on creating an IOT industry in India worth of USD 15 billion by 2020 with a share of 5-6% of global IOT industry TSDSI joined the oneM2M consortium which is seen as a major step towards the convergence of IOT standardization efforts in India TEC tasked to identify and define India specific M2M standards and contribute to the global standardization efforts BIS has setup two panels namely, Internet of Things and Smart Infrastructure. Tasked to examine the progress of International standards and identify the gap and need of standards to meet India specific requirements IOT4SCF (IOT for Smart City Forum) aims to develop standards, guidelines and procedures for application of IOT to various smart city solutions

9 INDIAN EFFORTS Organizations Committees/Working Group Efforts
Telecommunications Standards Development Society, India (TSDSI) Working group 8 (WG8) on M2M to study Indian requirements of M2M and IOT Services Technical reports mentioning the study of Indian use cases has been released by TSDSI. 2015 – TSDSI joined the one M2M consortium Bureau of Indian Standards Setup two panels namely, Internet of Things and Smart Infrastructure. Tasked to examine the progress of International standards and identify the gap and need of standards for India BIS works in close association with the ISO/IEC initiatives. Telecommunication Engineering Centre, DoT, GoI In 2014, five working groups (WGs) formed - M2M gateway & architecture, power, automotive, health, safety and surveillance. In June 2015, 6 new WGs formed - security, smart cities, smart homes, smart villages, agriculture, smart environment and smart governance. WGs have released different technical reports. Have identified the need of a standardized M2M service layer similar to the one being promoted by the oneM2M consortium. Seconded European Standardization Expert in India Focus areas - electrical and electronic household products, ITS, smart cities, ICT domains like M2M/IOT, Security, 5G, NFV/SDN etc. It is playing a major role in converging the various standardization efforts going on in India with that at the International level. IOT for Smart Cities Task Force (IOT4SCTF) Divided into three working groups on usage scenarios, architecture and RFP framework. It aims to develop standards, guidelines and procedures for application of IOT to various smart city solutions. Released a draft IOT reference architecture for smart cities.

10 IEEE P2413 Working Group IEEE has more than 300 standards relevant to IOT Revising 40 existing standards to adapt them for IOT and is working on further new IOT standards IEEE P2413 working group acts as the umbrella for all this standardization work Membership includes companies like Cisco, Intel, Wipro, Honeywell, Huawei, Qualcomm, Schneider, Siemens, STMicroelectronics etc. It aims to provide an architectural framework defining various IOT domains (like energy, home and buildings etc.), their abstractions, their relationship with each other and common architecture elements with an aim to promote cross-domain interaction, interoperability, functional compatibility, reliability and security It aims to use existing applicable standards and collaborate & coordinate with groups with similar objectives like ISO/IEC JTC 1, Industrial Internet Consortium (IIC), oneM2M, ITU etc.

11 Conclusion IOT is a diversified domain with plenty of organizations/consortia are working towards standardizations at different layers of a layered architecture Sensor interface standardization is getting addressed by IEEE at global level Communication networks - plenty of possible standardized technologies with Thread also picking up Service and connectivity layers - can be based on the new merged IOT-ivity oneM2M also defines the service layer/IOT platform and manages the semantic interoperability as well It will require a concerted effort of the major National and International standards bodies to arrive at global standards for IOT Pitch India’s interest at such global standardization organizations and consortia and come up with guidelines/standards to fill in the gap, wherever necessary Important to address Security standards in IOT including Identity and Privacy In Nut-shell, we need viable standards addressing the concerns; right standards for right purposes; best practices and guidelines

12 Applying Advanced Computing for Human Advancement
Thank You! 12 12 12


Download ppt "Dr. N Sarat Chandra Babu/ C-DAC Bangalore"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google