1. Wisconsin TeenDrivingPlan
CoIIN Cohort 2 Storyboard

2. Wisconsin Teen Driving Team
Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin
Deena Liska, Teen Driving Coordinator
Carissa Hoium, Motor Vehicle Safety Coordinator
Waushara County Health Department
Judy Burton, Public Health Nurse
Stefanie Eldredge, Public Health Nurse
Becky Mattice, PH Tech
Patti Wohlfeil, Health Officer
Greendale Health Department
Madeline Eisen, Public Health Specialist
Shawne Johnson, PHN Supervisor
Sue Shepeard, Health Officer
Grant County Health Department
Jeff Kindrai, Director/Health Officer
Jamie Kreul, PHA, CPST
Walworth County Health Department
Beth Walsh, Public Health Supervisor
Holli Wilke, Public Health Supervisor
Faith Olson, Public Health Nurse
Ashley Vickers, Health Educator
Wisconsin Department of Health
Melissa Heinz, IVP Coordinator
Leah Ludlum, Public Health Nurse Consultant-MCH
Wajiha Akhtar, Epidemiologist/Evaluator
Molly Zemke, IVP Strategic Plan Coordinator

3. Overall Aim Statement
By June 2017, we will reduce deaths, hospitalizations, and emergency department (ED) visits resulting from a crash in which the victim was a driver or occupant of a motor vehicle and between the ages of 15 and 19.
Our goals are to:
Decrease the teen motor vehicle mortality rate by 2% relative to the state/jurisdiction baseline;
Decrease the rate of teen motor vehicle-related hospitalizations by 2% relative to the state/jurisdiction baseline; and
Decrease the rate of teen motor vehicle-related ED visits by 2% relative to state/jurisdiction baseline.

4. Driver Diagram

5. Process Measures & Goals
Process Measures 11 and 16
Goal
Progress
11. The % of parents reporting understanding of GDL requirements
16. The % of parents educated on GDL
By December 2016, stakeholder groups will identify at least one community facilitator and deliver the intervention to at least one group of parents in their community.
3 of our 5 stakeholders identified facilitators and scheduled a parent session.

6. Process Measures & Goals
Progress
18. The % of active stakeholders in the state/jurisdiction teen driver safety coalition
100% of the stakeholders in this intervention will be actively engaged, as evidenced by meeting attendance, communication, and program implementation.
We have 3 communities actively working on this intervention, and a 4th that is actively investigating it. We have also engaged an independent provider with an interest in using this intervention.

7. Process Measures & Goals
Progress
19. The % of programs evaluated
100% of the programs will be evaluated using data quantitative collected during the intervention and qualitative, formative input.
3 of our 5 stakeholders have scheduled a parent session, and data will be entered after.

8. Organizing Our Work
In 2016, we began the implementation of the Maternal Child Health adolescent transportation safety objective:
Identified intervention that would be used
Established and codified relationships between key stakeholders
Adapted intervention for Wisconsin use
Developed facilitator training and data collection tools
Trained Local Health Department staff as facilitators
Identified and trained community members as facilitators
Conducted a pre-pilot with 3 communities and approximately 30 participants
Reviewed and revised all materials based on pre-pilot feedback
Met quarterly as a learning community

9. Tools We created an online training for Facilitators
Uses a Learning Management System
All tools are in one location for easy access
Organized like a checklist for effective self-learning
Completion/progress can be observed
Created surveys tools to collect data
Uses Redcap
All data is being collected in the same place

10. Lessons Learned
We planned
We found
We predict. . .
To partner with a driving school in one high school to implement the intervention
The contracted driving school in that target high school has their own required materials
We can offer the program through a different venue, and approach other driving schools and the private high school
To walk through the Facilitator training and data collection tools with each site through a WebEx type of meeting
Looking at the materials together in real time allowed us to have a more complete discussion about the training
This could be a useful strategy in training community facilitators
To conduct the sessions using community facilitators
A loss of fidelity, ranging from minor to significant
Facilitators will need a close connection with program coordinators and additional training/mentoring may be required
To implement TDP sessions through existing partners and connections
Building some of these relationships was taking time and not being captured in our data
Engaging partners will require significant time building stakeholder relationships

11. Next Steps In 2017, our plan is to:
Fully pilot the adapted intervention with at least 200 people reached, and at multiple sessions in each community
Explore the use of community facilitators
Make rolling revisions to materials
Evaluate the data