Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Ischemic Stroke 2010 and the Future

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Ischemic Stroke 2010 and the Future"— Presentation transcript:

1 Ischemic Stroke 2010 and the Future
Lawrence R. Wechsler, M.D. Professor and Chair, Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh Director, UPMC Stroke Institute

2 Disclosures Consultant: Abbott Vascular, NMT, Ferrer
Steering committee: ACT I, CLOSURE DSMB: DIAS 3 / 4, SAPPHIRE WW Scientific Advisory Board and Stockholder: Neurointerventional Therapeutics

3 Outline Medical therapy for stroke prevention Recanalization
Imaging in patient selection Telestroke

4 Stroke Prevention 2010 Risk factor control BP, diabetes, lipids
Antiplatelet agents ASA, Plavix, Aggrenox Anticoagulation Afib, hypercoagulable states Carotid revascularization CEA v. CAS

5 Medical Therapy for Carotid Disease
Study Year Surgery (% Stroke /Yr) Medical Rx (% Stroke/Yr) Difference (% Stroke/Yr) NASCET > 70% 1991 4.5% 13% 8.5% NASCET 50-69% 1998 3.1% 4.4% 1.3% ACAS 1995 1.0% 2.2% 1.2% ACST 2004 2.4% 1.1%

6 Optimal Medical Management 2010
Blood pressure control < 130 systolic, 85 diastolic Diuretics, ACE Inhibitors Lipids < 70 LDL, > 50 HDL HbA1c < 7% Smoking cessation Lifestyle modification – weight loss, exercise, diet

7 Intensive Medical Therapy for Asymptomatic Stenosis
Kaplan Meier survival free of stroke, death , MI for 468 pts with > 60% asymptomatic stenosis before and after instituting intensive medical therapy p<0.001 Spence et al. Arch Neurol 2010

8 IV tPA for Acute Stroke Only FDA approved therapy for treatment of acute stroke 3-4.5 hr window for treatment Earlier treatment increases chance of good outcome Limitations – exclusions, large artery disease, reocclusion

9 PROACT II: 90-Day Outcomes Intra-arterial Prourokinase – MCA Occl
(90 days) r–proUK (n = 121) Control (n = 59) Absolute P ————————— % ————————— mRS ≤ 2 40 25 15 0.043 mRS ≤ 1 26 17 9 0.16 Barthel index ≥ 90 41 32 0.24 Barthel index ≥ 60 54 47 7 0.39 NIHSS ≤ 1 18 12 6 0.30 NIHSS > 50% ↓ 50 44 0.46 Mortality 27 -2 0.80 Furlan A, et al. JAMA. 1999;282:

10 PROACT II: MCA Recanalization
Angiogram P < 0.001 P = 0.003 Furlan A, et al. JAMA. 1999;282:

11 Mechanical Thrombectomy
Concentric Medical Penumbra Not yet FDA approved: Ekos, Omnisonics, Lazarus Effect, MindFrame, Phenox

12 MERCI – Recanalization v. Outcome
Smith WS, et al. Stroke. 2005;36:

13 Recanalization v. Infarct Size
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RECANALIZATION AND FINAL INFARCT VOLUME IN 159 PATIENTS TREATED WITH IA THROMBOLYSIS FOR ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE AT UPMC P < by ANOVA Zaidi et al. Stroke 2009

14 Time to Recanalization v. Outcome
Khatri et al Neurology 2009

15 Recanalization by Treatment Modality – UPMC SI
Pts (n) TIMI 2 – 3 TIMI 3 ———————— % ———————— IV/IA t–PA 66 61 25 IA lytic 117 57 Gp IIb/IIIa + lytic 31 81 42 Angioplasty 67 70 40 Intracranial stent 20 90 50 MERCI retriever 204 79 --- DAC 76 88 Penumbra 39 93 I superscripted ® Grace, remove all lines form tables except: rule above table rule below table header rule below table

16 Recanalization-Outcomes Mismatch
80-90% RECANALIZATION 40-50% RECANALIZATION WITH GOOD OUTCOMES 40-50% RECANALIZATION WITH POOR OUTCOME Time to Rx Depth of ischemia TIMI 2 v. 3 Stroke location No reflow

17 Tissue vs. Time Window: Selecting the right Patient
< 3 Hrs > 3 Hrs Imaging required to assess pathophysiology = % Patients with Penumbra Early time is surrogate marker for penumbra Time From Onset (Hours) Courtesy MR Rescue Trial

18 DEFUSE: Mismatch associated with good outcomes following reperfusion
Before tPA NIHSS 16 6 cc 4.5 hrs After tPA NIHSS 5 Improved 0 cc IV tPA 3 cc 65 cc ↓ M2 Flow

19 DEFUSE: IV tPA 3-6 Hrs Favorable Clinical Response*
Target Mismatch with and without Early Reperfusion Mismatch + ER (n=15) Median NIHSS: 14 Mean Age: 79 67% 19% Mismatch - ER (n=16) Median NIHSS: 13 Mean Age: 68 Odds Ratio P = 0.011 *NIHSS 0-1 / > 8 pt improvement at 30 days Albers et al. Ann Neurol 2006

20 PWI / DWI Mismatch - Quantitation

21 Stroke Treatment with IV tPA
Only 2-8% of stroke patients receive IV tPA > 50% of hospitals < 100 beds Lack of available stroke specialist in community hospitals major impediment to emergent treatment Telestroke brings stroke experts to community hospitals

22 Telemedicine for Stroke
Audebert et al. Cerebrovasc Dis 2005

23 Change in tPA Usage Before and After Starting Telestroke – Spoke Hospital
Telestroke increases utilization of IV tPA Increases percent of patients treated with IV tPA

24 Future of Acute Stroke Therapy
Reduce time to arterial recanalization Greater TIMI 3 recanalization Select patients most likely to benefit and less likely to be harmed Treat patients based on physiology not time Increase utilization of acute stroke therapy through telemedicine and stroke systems of care


Download ppt "Ischemic Stroke 2010 and the Future"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google