Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

New nTOF target: Design Issues

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "New nTOF target: Design Issues"— Presentation transcript:

1 New nTOF target: Design Issues
Abstract: Following the radiation safety requirement that nTOF lead target shall not be in contact with the cooling water, an entirely new target assembly must be developed. The concept of a clad target is described. Preliminary designs of target geometry and target integration in the existing cooling loop are shown, as well as structures for positioning and installation.

2 Outline Introduction Design issues Summary
Old Target versus New Design issues Radiation Safety  Target Cladding Cooling  Geometry of Target Assembly Integration  Supports & Installation Summary Estimated cost, manpower, time Ans PARDONS ABOC Days 22-24/01/2007

3 Introduction Satisfy the safety requirements of SC/RP
Clad lead target cooled by existing system Guidelines for the new target design Keep the neutron flux characteristics Reduce radioactive waste (target mass) Reduce overall activation From ABMB meeting, 12 June 2006 Ans PARDONS ABOC Days 22-24/01/2007

4 Remark This presentation shows:
First studies to identify design issues First simulations (thermal, mechanical) give preliminary results to guide design Estimations for cost, manpower & time Work and results from: SBM Ingénierie & AB/ATB & TS/MME Ans PARDONS ABOC Days 22-24/01/2007

5 ? Introduction Old Target
Lead blocks directly in contact with cooling water Target mass > 4 tons Support structure entirely stainless steel (water basin in aluminium  corrosion risk) New Target ? No direct contact between target lead & water circuit Smaller target (~1 ton) Optimised support structure (corrosion, activation, etc.) Ans PARDONS ABOC Days 22-24/01/2007

6 Design issues: Radiation Safety
Target Cladding Metal(*) clad lead target with lead core Consequences of cladding: 1. Thermal contact resistance between lead and cladding. Need for good contact pressure between core and shell. 2. Core and shell will have different temperatures  different expansion  large forces on shell. Proposal: Introduce initial core-shell gap, to have contact at nominal working temperature. Needs to be studied! (*) Aluminium is used in the calculations. Material may have to change for reasons of radioactive waste disposal (see talk Luisa ULRICI, today at 12:00) Possible production method Challenge Lead: Tensile Strength, Ultimate18 MPa  Modulus of Elasticity14 GPa Melting point ~320°C Ans PARDONS ABOC Days 22-24/01/2007

7 Cladding: Thermal equilibrium
Cylindrical target (R=26.5cm) with 5mm aluminium cladding deposited energy 3.4kW(*) to be evacuated Assume adequate cooling Results from thermal calculations: Temperature rise from lead to aluminium ~ 75K Estimated temperature rise of 130K between start-up and equilibrium  Target temperature reaches 150 °C which is acceptable (45% of lead melting temperature) Cylindrical shape better cooled and generally easier for production (*)Load case = 5 pulses/16.8s supercycle Ans PARDONS ABOC Days 22-24/01/2007

8 Design issues: Cooling
Cooling  Target Assembly Geometry Maximum temperature: Target: 150°C Water: 90°C 90°C! Water Inlet Nozzles: Flow=6l/s Velocity=0.01m/s Natural convection is dominant! Water flow = 22 m3/h (6 l/s) Pressure: pool is at atmospheric pressure Inlet water temperature: 30°C Water velocity at inlet: 0,01 m/s (10 inlet, Ø26mm) Inlet water sections at each extremity of the pool From water flow and dissipated power (~4KW): average water temperature rise: ΔT~0,15K Existing water flow not adapted to size of new target Target is sufficiently cooled, but water temperature locally high  Need to redirect / concentrate / guide the water flow around the target Ans PARDONS ABOC Days 22-24/01/2007

9 Optimized for cooling Challenge
Proposal: Filling part to help guide the water and increase local velocity Water temperature: Average: 22°C - Local:50°C 50°C Water velocity around target: Average: 0.02 m/s - Local: 0.1m/s Filling parts are efficient Challenge Filling parts: complex geometry, minimize mass Support structure to be adapted Impact on target integration to be evaluated Ans PARDONS ABOC Days 22-24/01/2007

10 Transient behaviour Dynamic effect
(*)Load case = 7ns burst, 1.2s pulse, 5 pulses/16.8s supercycle Maximum target temperature vs. time  effect of each pulse and supercycle(*) 150°C 195°C 7 minutes Temperature Time 20°C Dynamic effect will cause shockwaves and cyclic stresses. (time-scale = msec) Fatigue? Cracks? Lifetime? Lead melting temp = 320°C Ans PARDONS ABOC Days 22-24/01/2007

11 Transient elasto-plastic behaviour
12MPa Time Equivalent stress 0MPa 5MPa 1 millisecond 10MPa Plasticity First results: Presence of plasticity Fatigue driven failure of the material will occur in central region (number of cycles to be determined). Next steps: Get detailed material properties (literature / experiment) Take into account the initial gap and the cladding material. Fatigue analysis of both lead and cladding material. Instantaneous hydrostatic elastic pressure EαΔT/(1-2υ) = 130MPa Radial wave period (shown) ~250μs Longitudinal wave period ~400μs Lead: Lead material properties [1,2]: Young's modulus: 14 GPa Yield stress: 12 MPa Tangent modulus: 60 MPa Poisson's ration: υ=0.44 (low volume change) Thermal expansion coefficient: α=29,1.10-6/K Melting point ~320°C Radial wave period ~265μs Lead Challenge Ans PARDONS ABOC Days 22-24/01/2007

12 Design issues: Integration
Supports and guiding system Need for precise positioning (access!) Limited space available Integrate “filling parts” Installation vertical + horizontal (moderator) T First ideas: remotely actuated sliding table, tubes for moderator To do: Design Prototypes Production Challenge Ans PARDONS ABOC Days 22-24/01/2007

13 Summary: Remaining design work
Cladding & gap (define material, geometry, production method) Optimise cooling circuit (define geometry, link to target support) Simulate dynamic behaviour (perform material tests & calculations) Integration of components (define supports, guides) Ans PARDONS ABOC Days 22-24/01/2007

14 Estimated Cost, Manpower &Time
Cost target & supports: 240 kCHF Manpower AB/ATB: 1.5 FTE - SC/RP: 0.5 FTE - TS/MME: ? Time for design (internal) 4 – 6 months Time for target production (external) 6 – 9 months Ans PARDONS ABOC Days 22-24/01/2007


Download ppt "New nTOF target: Design Issues"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google