Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Three Maintainers and a *ing Op

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Three Maintainers and a *ing Op"— Presentation transcript:

1 Three Maintainers and a *ing Op
Greg “The Hammer” Hamilton Meghan “Wonder Wo”Manelski “Magic” Mike Johnson “Woody” Bridges

2 Team members: The Hammer; Wonder Womanelski; Magic Mike; Woody
Team: Three Maintainers and a *ing Op System: Remote Maintenance System (RMS) Strategic Values/Objectives: Low cost Secure Reliable Low manpower overhead Expandable/Reconfigurable Descriptive Statement The Remote Maintenance System (RMS) enables real-time monitoring, troubleshooting, and repair/restoration of airborne mission systems. This allows technicians to maximize system readiness by scheduling work, ordering replacement parts, and returning off-line systems to service in real-time. The RMS allows specialized off-board maintenance technicians to address system anomalies for which on-board crewmembers may not possess the necessary technical proficiency and training. Team members: The Hammer; Wonder Womanelski; Magic Mike; Woody

3 Three Maintainers and a *ing Op – Remote Maintenance System (RMS)
CURVE High-Level System/Process Environment Consider both reactive needs & proactive opportunities to seize, within mission Capriciousness: unknowable situations System anomalies (reactive) Automated troubleshooting development (proactive) Uncertainty: randomness with unknowable probabilities Network availability (reactive) Quantity of aircraft supported at any given time (reactive) Risk: randomness with knowable probabilities Performance of remote maintainers (reactive) Ability/Inability of supported aircraft to accomplish mission (reactive) Variation: knowable variables and variance range Qualified personnel availability (reactive) Operating location of supported aircraft versus supporting RMS (reactive) Performance measures of COTS equipment (proactive) Defining required skillsets for high-interest mission profiles (proactive) Evolution: gradual (relatively) successive developments Development of new testing modules/support equipment (reactive) Deployment of more RMS (reactive) Technical maturity over time (proactive)

4 System: Remote Maintenance System (RMS)
Reality Factors Human (Including Customer) Behavior – Human error, whimsy, expediency, arrogance... Fatigue Attention to detail Task Saturation Experience level Organizational Behavior – Survival rules rule, nobody's in absolute control... Over confidence; arrogance High workload/low manpower Under/Over reporting maintenance problems Technology Pace – Accelerating technology and security-vulnerability introductions, sparse testing... Application-based products Security Loss of control System Complexity – Incomprehensible, highly networked, unintended consequences, emergence... Networking complexities Detailed documentation Training Globalization – Partners with different ethics, values, infrastructures, cultural assumptions... Time differential Support prioritization Denied areas of service (link availability/unavailability based on area of operation) Partially-Agile Enterprise Faddish Practices – Outsourcing, web services, transparency, COTS policies/affects... COTS upgrades (unplanned firmware upgrades) Outsourced web services/network connectivity Reliability of trend analysis data Agile Customers/Competitors/Adversaries – Distributed, collaborative, self organizing, proactive, impatient, innovative... Unrealistic customer expectations Funding for necessary upgrades Competition from other companies Other? Cost – will this approach be cost-prohibitive?

5 Response Situation Analysis for System: Remote Maintenance System
with [t,c,p,s] metric-priorities for each issue, t = time of change, c = cost of change, p = predictability of change, s = scope of change Change Domain Change/Response Issue Proactive Reactive Creation (and Elimination) What must the system be creating or eliminating in the course of its operational activity? Eliminate system down time (p) Eliminate unnecessary expenses (c) Create intuitive UI (s) Improvement What performance characteristics will the system be expected to improve during operational life cycle? Speed of identifying/fixing system anomalies (t) Enhanced network availability/performance (s) Enhanced troubleshooting techniques (p) Migration What major events coming down the road will require a change in the system infrastructure? Atmospherics (sunspots, weather, etc.) (t,c) Network outages (s) World events (t,c,p,s) Modification (Add/Sub Capability) What modifications in resources-employed might need made as the system is used? Enhanced technical data (t,c,s) Improved COTS equipment (c,s) Redundant communications systems (c,s) Correction What can go wrong that will need an automatic systemic detection and response? Link loss (p) Intrusion (c,p,s) Environmental factors (fire, smoke, natural disaster, etc.) (t,c,s) Variation What process variables will range across what values and need accommodation? Technician skillsets (t,c) Attrition (t,c,s) RMS location in relation to supported aircraft (c,p,s) Expansion (and Contraction of Capacity) What are “quantity-based” elastic-capacity range needs on resources/output/activity/other? Number of aircraft supported at once (s) Scalability of RMS (c) Link bandwidth and throughput (c,p,s) Reconfigu-ration What types of resource relationship configurations will need changed during operation? Updated ROE & TTP (t,s) Operating location (t,c) Personnel (s)

6 System: Remote Maintenance System
(Think … Drag-and-Drop / Plug-and-Play) Encapsulated Modules Racks Power supplies Software applications Encryption path Cooling fans Scalable Reusable Evolving Infrastructure Standards Sockets: Power cabling Crypto devices RMS module interconnects Signals: SATCOM/LOS communications Security: Common training and terminology Standardized ICDs Safety: EMI regulations OSHA standards FAA standards Service: Troubleshooting tool ConOps sockets (physical interconnect) signals (data/stuff flow between modules) security (trust interconnect) safety (of user, system, and environment) service (system assembly ConOps and evolutionary agility sustainment)

7 System: Remote Maintenance System
Sample Graphics for your modification into your system needs Resources Integrity Management Technicians Developers Network Communications Software RMS Structure Test Equipment Situational awareness Resource mix evolution Resource readiness Activity assembly Infrastructure evolution PM FM, Warehouse Mgr PE Developers Lead Maintenance Tech (LMT) Active Infrastructure Passive Config 1 Config 2 Config n Sockets Signals Security Safety Service What? Rules/Standards


Download ppt "Three Maintainers and a *ing Op"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google