Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Z. Bosch, M. Kruger and M. Saayman

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Z. Bosch, M. Kruger and M. Saayman"— Presentation transcript:

1 Z. Bosch, M. Kruger and M. Saayman
THE INFLUENCE OF TOURISTS’ SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC AND BEHAVIOURAL VARIABLES ON ADVENTURE ACTIVITY PREFERENCES IN SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL PARKS Prof Peet van der Merwe Z. Bosch, M. Kruger and M. Saayman North West University Research Unit: TREES

2 Layout of talk Introduction Aim of research Literature review Method
Results Findings and implications Conclusion

3 Introduction Largest contributors to nature/wildlife-based tourism - SA National Parks Falls under DEA SA National Parks generates 75% of its operating revenue Tourism revenue increase by 10% each year Park will generate R800 million - operational costs R1.4 billion An alternative strategy - generating additional revenue Adventure activities has been identified

4 Aim of research To determine the adventure preferences of tourists to South African National Parks based on respondents (tourist’s) socio-demographic and behavioural variables

5 Literature review Key areas: Adventure
adventure tourism socio-demographic and behavioural characteristics Adventure ATTA (2011) by 2050, adventure travel as the reason for all travel will increase to 50% Two categories soft – low risk activities hard – high risk activities Skills of participants

6 Literature review Socio-demographic and behavioural aspects
Socio-demographic variables that influence tourists behaviour Age, gender, family life cycle, household composition Nationality/place of residence, cultural background, depended children Educational level, motivation, occupation, distance travel The influence of each can however differ in terms of visitors’ preferences for hard or soft adventure

7 Literature review

8 Literature review Previous research
Outdoor activities positively influenced by membership Members of nature/outdoor organisations are more likely to participate Gender influence participation in adventure/outdoor activities Male participants tend to take part in more hard adventure and masculine activities Younger participants tend to participate more in adventure activities Slight increase in adventure participation from older respondents ( years of age)

9 Literature review Presences of young children in households, decreased participation Education influence participation levels More years of further education - five time higher likelihood to participating in adventure Participants who were more affluent participate more Marital status do have a moderate impact on adventure participation

10 Method of research Quantitative research design Questionnaire design
Section A: Socio­ demographic and behavioural information Section B: adventure tourism (Van der Merwe, 2009: 235; Allen, 2010; Mill, 2010; Schneider & Vogt, 2012:704) Sampling method and size April and May 2014. Sample size (n) Factor analysis t-tests and ANOVA

11 Results Profile Factor analysis t-tests and ANOVA

12 Results: Profile Gender: female (51%) and male (49%)
English speaking (68%) Married (67%) Gauteng (41%) Degree or diploma (47%) 49 average age 34% had children (49% two children and 38% ages of 19 to 25 years) Wild Card holders Last five years an average of 8.54 times Stayed between 2 to 7 nights

13 Results: Factor analysis soft adventure
Factors Items/activities Cronbach’s Alpha Mean value Initial eigenvalues: total 1. Water-based Surfboard surfing; Paddle boats; Sailing; Snorkelling; Sandboarding; Motorboat rides; Jet skiing; Scuba diving ; Canoeing 0.90 1.76 12.43 2. Interpretive Safari/game viewing; Night drives; Bird watching; Stargazing; Guided walks 0.72 3.71 3.67 3. Wildlife interaction Elephant rides; Animal interaction; Quad biking 0.81 1.62 2.09 4. Heritage Archaeological tours; Historical tours; Geographical tours; Cultural dances; Botanical tours 0.85 2.86 1.68 5. Consumptive Hunting; Archery; Fishing 0.67 1.49 1.39 6. Trail/ Trekking Backpacking; Cycling routes; Hiking; Horseback safaris 2.49 1.26 7. Self-executing 4x4 trails (guided); 4x4 trails (self-drive); Campsite camping 3.45 1.08 8. Team based Orienteering ; Team building; Obstacle course; Zip lining 0.84 1.70 1.05

14 Results: Factor analysis hard adventure
Factors Items/activities Cronbach’s Alpha Mean value Initial eigenvalues: total 1. Adrenaline rush Bungee jumping; Skydiving; High-rope activities; Off-road and dirt biking; Cliff jumping; Hang gliding; Kitesurfing; Paragliding/Parasailing; Abseiling; Shark diving 0.95 1.53 12.18 2. Wilderness training and survival courses Field-guide training; Wilderness camping; Survival and wilderness training; Survival games 0.83 2.91 1.91 3. Adventure sports Kayaking; Mountain biking; Trail running; Rock climbing; White-water rafting; Caving; Mountain climbing 0.94 1.98 1.08

15 Socio-demographic variables
t-tests: gender, age and home language (factor analyses of hard and soft) ANOVAs and Post hoc - marital status and province of residence

16 Socio-demographic variables
Gender Male respondents - statistical significantly differences soft adventure activities water-based, consumptive, trail/trekking and self- executing Hard adventure activities: wilderness training and survival courses Age 39 years and younger regarded all adventure factors (soft and hard) more important Hard adventure activity: wilderness training and survival courses and adventure sport Language Soft - consumptive, self-executing and team-based

17 Socio-demographic variables
Marital status Living together: heritage and trail/trekking more important (soft) Single and living together - adventure sports (hard) Geographic Western Cape – adventure sport

18 Travel behaviour Do you participate in adventure activities in your leisure time? Wild Card’ holder? Adventure participation Those who participate rate all adventure (hard & soft) as important Wild Card holders Wild Card holders found self-executing to be very important (soft) Non Wild Card holders - wilderness training and survival courses Non-Wild Card holders will be more likely to participate in adventure activities in national parks.

19 Findings and implications
First finding Research identified hard and soft adventure factors not previously identified - interpretative (soft adventure) and wilderness training and survival courses (hard adventure) Implication That traditional soft adventure activities stays important (interpretative) - game viewing/safari, night game viewing, bird watching, stargazing and guided walks remain important to tourist Hard - wilderness training and survival games

20 Findings and implications
Second finding: socio-demographic variables Gender: Male - water based activities, consumptive activities (fishing and hunting) and trail/trekking Implication Water-based activities: Table Mountain National Park, West Coast National Park and Garden Route National Park Fishing activities: Marine parks and Golden Gate National Park Trail/trekking - developing new and more challenging trails

21 Findings and implications
Age Finding: hard and soft adventure activities were rated more important by younger respondents Implication Adventure activities in parks must be market amongst younger tourists Marital status Single or living together: heritage (archaeological and geological tours) and adventure sport (kayaking, mountain biking, trail running, rock climbing, white-water rafting and caving) Golden Gate, Table Mountain, Camdeboo National Parks will be perfect for mountain climbing and caving. Tsitsikamma, Wilderness and Augrabies Falls National Parks will suit kayaking.

22 Third finding: Geographical location or place of residence Implication
Western Cape: hard adventure activities to be more important Implication Western Cape parks : Table Mountain, Wilderness, Agulhas, Bontebok and West Coast national parks Last finding: behavioural variables do impact Wild Card members: game drives, trails (four wheel drive/non four wheel drive) and camping Non Wild Card members: hard adventure activities - field-guide training, wilderness camping, survival and wilderness training and survival games. The implications: Hard adventure activities can be marketed amongst non-Wild Card members and in national parks that can accommodate these activities

23 Conclusion Aim of this study: socio-demographics and behavioural variables on adventure preferences. Determine possible new adventure products for South African National Parks Contributes Identified soft and hard adventure activities Traditional soft adventure activities (like game viewing/safari) do stay important Field-guide training, wilderness camping, survival and wilderness training, and survival games - important hard eco-adventure activities identified for national parks Study confirmed that socio-demographic and behavioural variables do influence tourists’ preferences New eco-adventure activities can generate more income

24 Thank You


Download ppt "Z. Bosch, M. Kruger and M. Saayman"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google