Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The Role of Bone Marrow Transplant in Oncology

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The Role of Bone Marrow Transplant in Oncology"— Presentation transcript:

1 The Role of Bone Marrow Transplant in Oncology
Diane Hill-Polerecky RN, BSN, MS Leukemia Transplant Case Manager & Transplant Clinical Projects Coordinator Nebraska Medicine

2 Objectives Define and identify indication for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Identify donor sources Identify sources of Hematopoietic Cells Describe the transplant process and timeline Identify short-term and long-term complications and follow up of the Transplant patient

3 Transplant may be referred to as:
BMT – Bone Marrow Transplant PBSCT – Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant UCBT – Umbilical Cord Blood Transplant ** HSCT/HCT – Hematopoietic (Stem) Cell Transplant BMT PBSCT Umbilical – differentiates the way we get the cell. HSCT/HCT general encompassing –see this most in the literature. Don’t confuse HCT with hematocrit 

4 Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
Definition: High doses of chemotherapy and/or radiation are given to eradicate malignancies followed by an infusion of hematopoietic cells to reestablish marrow function. In addition HSCT from allo donor has additional anti tumor effect

5 Hematopoietic Stem Cell Cascade
Hematopoiesis the formation of blood cellular components. All cellular blood components are derived from hematopoietic stem cells. In a healthy adult person, approximately 1011–1012 new blood cells are produced daily in order to maintain steady state levels in the peripheral circulation

6 A small number of transplanted stem cells can replicate to repopulate a patient’s entire hematopoietic system A small number of transplanted cells can replicate to repopulate a patient’s entire hematopoietic system

7 Further defined by donor source
Autologous Patient’s own hematopoietic stem cells Allogeneic Cells collected from a donor Related or unrelated Syngeneic Cells collected from an identical twin Talk some more about why we do each of these in a bit

8 Just a little history 1959 Dr. E Donnall Thomas 1st attempt at treating leukemia with hi dose chemo and syngeneic marrow transplant Mid 1960s before they figured out HLA matching Late 1960s first successful (matched sibling) allogeneic for leukemia 1973 first unrelated allogeneic transplant Mid 1970s success with autologous for lymphoma, became widespread 1980s 1988 first successful UCB *Late 1960 Univ of Minnesota ** Auto/Lymphoma success due to peripheral collection ** UCB treated child with Fanconi anemia – lots learned since then, multiple banks established - viable option for adults and children

9 Autologous Transplants
Patient’s own cells are collected prior to receiving myeloablative (hi dose) chemotherapy Goal is to rescue the bone marrow after it has been destroyed by this lethal therapy Chemotherapy is the treatment, stem cells are the rescue. May be part of initial treatment plan or reserved for relapse or persistent disease states

10 Diseases treated with Autologous Transplant
Multiple Myeloma Hodgkins Disease Non Hodgkins Lymphoma Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Germ Cell tumors Neuroblastoma Brain tumors Sarcomas Recurrent Wilms Tumors Clinical Trials: other solid tumors, Crohns, Juvenile Rheum Arthritis, autoimmune disorders

11 Advantages of Autologous Transplant
Ready access to the stem cells Decreased incidence and severity of side effects Earlier engraftment No risk of Graft VS Host Disease

12 Disadvantages of Autologous Transplant
Risk of potential tumor contamination in the infused cell product Lack of Graft vs Tumor effect may contribute to relapse

13 Allogeneic Transplants
Treatment of choice for patients with diseased bone marrow or patients with genetic and immunologic disorders Myeloablative chemotherapy and/or radiation are given to eradicate malignancy AND to prepare recipient for donor cells Donor cells repopulate the marrow and provide GRAFT vs TUMOR effect Chemotherapy is the preparative regimen, stem cells are the treatment

14 Malignant Diseases treated with Allogeneic Transplant
AML and ALL with intermediate and hi risk prognostic factors Myelodysplastic Syndromes Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (blast phase) Myeloproliferative Disorders Non Hodgkin Lymphomas Multiple Myeloma / Hodgkins - rare Relapse after Autologous Transplant

15 Non Malignant Diseases treated with Allogeneic Transplant
Severe Aplastic Anemia Fanconi Anemia Thalassemia Sickle Cell Disease Diamond-Blackfan Anemia Congenital Neutropenia Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID) Hurler Syndrome Hunter Disease Fanconi is a rare genetic disease. Among those affected the majority develop cancer, most often acute myelogenous leukemia, and 90% develop bone marrow failure. SCID rare genetic disorder, absent immune system “boy in the plastic bubble” Hurler and Hunter are genetic disorders build of lysomal enzymes in the organs

16 Advantages of Allogeneic Transplant
Replacement of diseased or damaged bone marrow/stem cells with healthy cells Graft vs Tumor effect – powerful immune reaction wherein the newly transplanted immune cells react against any residual disease

17 Disadvantages of Allogeneic Transplant
Longer periods of immunosuppression Complex often long term medication regimens Graft vs Host Disease (GVHD) both acute and chronic

18 Syngeneic Transplant Stem cells are collected from identical twin
Considered allogeneic as a donor is involved. Acts more like autologous rescue. Lack of Graft vs Tumor effect Rare Graft vs Host Disease Recovery is more like an Autologous Transplant

19 Sources of Hematopoietic Cells
Bone Marrow Peripheral Stem Cell Umbilical Cord Blood

20 Bone Marrow Harvest Multiple needle aspirations of marrow from iliac crests
Advantages Disadvantages Completed in several hours No mobilization required Decreased risk of GVHD Preferred in nonmalignant disorders May still require multiple trips to donor center Need for general or epidural anesthesia Risk of bleeding, increased pain, infection, bone, soft tissue or nerve damage Slower Engraftment BM less GVHD due to less T cells in product. Used more in allo donors – see it with young women who have not had children. Used in auto donors who may have allergy to growth factors Preferred in those diseases where no graft vs tumor effect is required. Collect autologous blood

21 Bone Marrow Harvest

22 Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Collection
Autologous and Allogeneic Donors Stem Cells are mobilized out of the bone marrow into the peripheral blood in larger quantities with the use of growth factors and sometimes chemotherapy (auto donors) Stem cells then collected via apheresis process and remaining blood components returned to the donor Revolutionized the ability to do transplants – less risk to auto patients that may already be beaten up by chemo Made donation less risky, more appealing to unrelated donors

23 Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Collection
Advantages Disadvantages Outpatient, no anesthesia Generally well tolerated Cells obtained are more mature and engraft earlier – improved outcomes for recipient Can be utilized in patients that have received pelvis irradiation Side effects of growth factor (bone pain, flu like sx) Low blood counts with chemomobilization Requires apheresis catheter or large bore IVs Hypocalcemia Hypovolemia

24 Peripheral Stem Cell Collection
Do we need to ask permission to use this photo? Does NMDP have a stock photo we can use? Walk through what a PBSC collection is like.

25

26 Umbilical Cord Blood Transplant
Rich source of stem cells collected at time of childbirth. No risk to mother/child UCB cells have not matured immunologically, naïve, allows for greater degree of mismatch Can be frozen and stored Limited and finite number of cells. Can not go back to donor if additional cells are needed Slow engraftment, decreased graft vs tumor, increased graft failure UCB – cell dose is more important determinant of outcome and survival than cell source

27 Transplant Timeline Evaluation Recovery Consultation Chemotherapy ?
Ascertain Donor Harvest Cells ** Consultation – the earlier the better especially with potential Allo patients as donor identification can take awhile. Role of our Transplant Case Manager – consistent throughout process ** Additional chemotherapy as transplant works best with disease under control **Evaluation – allo prefer to be done at our facility for future comparison Preparative Therapy Transplant Day 0

28 Eligibility Considerations for Transplant
The malignancy is sensitive to therapy The disease is in an early stage Low tumor burden Marrow toxicity is the only dose-limiting effect of the treatment - Comorbidities Age Psychosocial well-being Compliance Caregiver availability

29 Care Partner Responsibilities
Assist with daily living activities Participate in educational sessions Collect data (VS, I/O, Wt) Assist patient with self-medication Ensure compliance with treatment and care schedule Care for central venous catheter Assist with oral care Encourage use of incentive spirometer Transportation Observe for therapy-related side effects and symptoms Contact the transplant team to report new symptoms or emergencies

30 Transplant Timeline Evaluation Recovery Consultation Chemotherapy ?
Ascertain Donor Harvest Cells ** Consultation – the earlier the better especially with potential Allo patients as donor identification can take awhile. Role of our Transplant Case Manager – consistent throughout process ** Additional chemotherapy as transplant works best with disease under control **Evaluation – allo prefer to be done at our facility for future comparison Preparative Therapy Transplant Day 0

31 Allogeneic Donors and HLA Matching
Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLA) are proteins found on the surface of most cells in the body The immune system uses HLA to verify that a given cell is part of the body and not foreign There are many different HLA proteins (HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, -DQ, -DP) and there are many varieties of each one

32 Why is HLA Matching Important?
If donor cells are not the same HLA type as the recipient the Tcells will recognize the recipient as being different and attack – and vice versa If the recipient cells win, you get graft rejection If the donor cells win, you get graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)

33

34 HLA Inheritance Mother Father A A B B C C DR DR Child 1 Child 2
9 10 3 4 B B 11 12 C C 5 6 13 14 DR 7 8 DR 15 16 Child 1 Child 2 Child 3 Child 4 A Inherit a haplotype from each parent. Usually inherit the entire haplotype from each parent, not parts of it (e.g. 1, 3, 5, 7 together). 1 9 A 1 10 A 2 9 A 2 10 B 3 11 B 3 12 B 4 11 B 4 12 C 5 13 C 5 14 C 6 13 C 6 14 DR 7 15 DR 7 16 DR 8 15 DR 8 16

35 What If No Family Members Match?
>17,000,000 people around the world have signed up to be volunteer donors for unrelated patients in need NMDP’s Be The Match Registry World’s largest pool of donors Domestic and International donors and cord blood units The transplant center is responsible for initiating a donor search

36 What if no NMDP match? 9/10 Unrelated Donor – some mismatches are better than others Haploidentical Related Matches Data supporting similar outcomes to unrelated10/10 match Further testing for antibodies More flexibility with scheduling – move to Transplant faster Post Transplant Cytoxan to reduce GVHD

37 Transplant Timeline Evaluation Recovery Consultation Chemotherapy ?
Ascertain Donor Harvest Cells ** Consultation – the earlier the better especially with potential Allo patients as donor identification can take awhile ** Additional chemotherapy as transplant works best with disease under control **Evaluation – allo prefer to be done at our facility for future comparison Preparative Therapy Transplant Day 0

38 Preparative Regimens: Myeloblative Full Intensity
Higher doses of chemo/radiation with goal of killing ALL the patient’s diseased cells and stem cells Generally more side effects – healthy cells are killed as well Auto conditioning vs Allo conditioning Allo patients begin receiving immunosupressive meds to prevent GVHD and graft rejection Autologous conditioning - blood counts could recover several weeks after regimen without PBSC rescue, but counts would not recover with allogeneic conditioning regimen without PBSCinfusion

39 Preparative Regimens: Nonmyeloablative - Reduced Intensity
Allogeneic Transplants only Lower doses of chemo/radiation Main goal to suppress recipient immune system to allow donor cells to engraft Primary benefit Graft vs Tumor Effect Patients less likely to tolerate side effects of high dose Age, Comorbidities, Lower Performance Status, Prior Therapies Blood Counts depressed for shorter time Most effective with very minimal residual disease

40 Transplant Timeline Evaluation Recovery Consultation Chemotherapy ?
Ascertain Donor Harvest Cells ** Consultation – the earlier the better especially with potential Allo patients as donor identification can take awhile ** Additional chemotherapy as transplant works best with disease under control **Evaluation – allo prefer to be done at our facility for future comparison Preparative Therapy Transplant Day 0

41 Day 0 – Cell Infusion: Hydration Premedication Monitoring
Cryo preserved vs non cryopreserved **Cells ability to find their way to the marrow after IV infusion

42 Transplant Timeline Evaluation Recovery Consultation Chemotherapy ?
Ascertain Donor Harvest Cells ** Consultation – the earlier the better especially with potential Allo patients as donor identification can take awhile ** Additional chemotherapy as transplant works best with disease under control **Evaluation – allo prefer to be done at our facility for future comparison Preparative Therapy Transplant Day 0

43 Inpatient Recovery Inpatient 2-3 weeks post cell infusion
Monitor for fever/infection Blood product support Nutrition support Activity - PT Manage toxicities Mouth sores, electrolyte imbalances, nausea/vomiting

44 Length of Stay in Omaha (Average Time)
Autologous Transplant Allogeneic Transplant Evaluation/Work-up: 1-2 days Collection: 1 week outpatient Inpatient: 3-4 weeks Outpatient: 1-2 weeks Evaluation/Work-up: 1-2 days Collection from donor: 1 week outpatient Inpatient: weeks Outpatient: Until day +100

45 Why 100 Days ? … or Allogeneic Transplants are a big deal!
Balancing act : Graft vs Tumor and Graft vs Host Disease Acute Graft vs Host can happen fast and can be deadly: Skin, Liver, GI Tract Management of Acute GVHD is very specialized Complex medication management with multiple side effects Immunosuppressant medications increase risk of infections Patients not allowed to drive, require 24hr caregiver and must be within 30min of NMC

46 Long Term Follow Up Autologous Allogeneic
Immunizations: 3,6,9,12 months and 2 years Irradiated Blood Products Day 100 Restaging Annual Follow Up Managing Long Term Side Effects Frequent follow up at NMC during 1st year Immunizations: 3,6,9,12 months and 2 years Irradiated Blood Products Annual Follow Up Collaborate with referring Oncologist Managing Long Term Side Effects Treating Chronic GVHD

47 High Dose Therapy Side Effects - Long Term
Fatigue/Depression Shingles Infertility Slow or Failure to Engraft Lung Scarring Heart Damage Secondary Cancer / Leukemia Cataracts Low Thyroid Function

48 Chronic GVHD – Trading one bad disease for another?
Despite having good HLA match, undergoing preparative regimen and compliance with immunosuppressant meds – GVHD can still occur Months to years later Skin, Eyes, Mouth, Pulmonary Early identification and treatment are key May require long term immunosuppression and steroids Greatly impacts Quality of Life

49 What’s new – What’s next?
CAR T cells Alternate Donor Sources: Haplo Related and Unrelated Preventing and Treating GVHD: Clinical Trials and Multidisciplinary Clinics Improving Long Term Quality of Life and Survivorship Selected Stem Cells/Cells for immune reconstitution Targeted Therapies (antibodies) Targeted therapy replaces hi dose chemo/radiaiton

50 Questions?

51 Additional Resources NMC Transplant Education Videos – Be the Match – Leukemia and Lymphoma Society –


Download ppt "The Role of Bone Marrow Transplant in Oncology"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google