Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byReynard Jordan Modified over 7 years ago
1
Iberdrola experience with massive BPL deployment over MV for Smart Grid
WSPLC’16 – Paris, France October 2016
2
Index 1 Background
3
1. Background
4
Traditional involvement with PLC
1. Background Traditional involvement with PLC Analog Power Line Carrier, same as many other utilities (~7 links left today) First trials (‘playing’ with the technology) in the 80’s Some more serious experiences/pilots in the 90’s, led European and international initiatives (e.g. IPCF) Jumped into the Internet bubble after testing the technology, started providing commercial services in By 2005, service stopped. Technologically it worked: BPL on MV and LV lines. Know-how started to accrue.
5
Index 2 Motivation
6
Smart Metering mandate in Spain (Royal Decree 809/2006 etc.)
2. Motivation Smart Metering mandate in Spain (Royal Decree 809/2006 etc.) Situation at that time seen as ‘locked market’ with proprietary or legacy solutions Successfully initiated activity on narrowband PLC (PRIME), to be deployed over LV networks (up to ~11M smart meters) PLC architecture meant basically communications had to be delivered to the Data Concentrator location, which is usually a so-called ‘Secondary Substation’ where one or more transformers convert MV to LV. … might BPL over MV lines be part of the solution?
7
2. Motivation
8
Type # 2. Motivation Substations (Primary) Thousands
(1, ,300) Distribution Substations (Above ground & Pole-mount) Tens of Thousands (40,000 & 29,000) Distribution Substations (Below ground) (29,000) Smart meters Millions (10,900,000)
9
Royal Decree established intermediate milestones and final deadline
2. Motivation Timeline Royal Decree established intermediate milestones and final deadline December 31st 2018: all meters replaced Opportunity for Smart Grid services at 80k+ Secondary Substations: various degrees of automation, sensing, future services (e.g. surveillance) Ramp-up of deployment started in 2010 Currently close to 50k Secondary Substations deployed, some 18,000 have BPL, installing around 100 new BPL devices a week.
10
Index 3 Requirements & functionalities
11
Telecommunications Network
3. Requirements & functionalities Telecommunications Network ACCESS NETWORK Substation MV BPL 11
12
Has to be comparable in CAPEX+OPEX:
3. Requirements & functionalities Requirements Should be giving at least speeds of mobile GPRS/3G, plus comparable (or better) reliability Has to be comparable in CAPEX+OPEX: BPL allows for backbone sharing among several SS’s Controlled OPEX Better than mobile for 8-year amortization for BPL clusters of around 5 SS’s Needs to be easily deployed and seamlessly integrated into Smart Grid Needs to allow for multiple vendors
13
Supports any upper layer protocol
3. Requirements & functionalities Functionalities Broadband technology selected. BPL of Marvell (ex-DS2), also known as OPERA technology (DSS 9003 chipset). Basic PHY technology: 1536 OFDM subcarriers in configurable BW’s: 10, 20 or 30 MHz. Concatenation of 4D-TCM and Reed Solomon coding. Adaptive modulation from 1 to 10 bit/Hz (Amplitude & DPSK) MAC: Combination of TDM and CSMA. Master-slave with token. Each transceiver acts like an Ethernet bridge Supports any upper layer protocol
14
Index 4 Planning & deployment
15
First step: definition of planning rules!
4. Planning & deployment First step: definition of planning rules! MV-BPL networks require some planning to maximize penetration in a certain area while keeping performance. Main factors to consider are: Overhead/underground MV cables Frequency band(s) Maximum distances considered for P2P BPL link (depends on freq band and type of cable) Minimum distances to avoid interference among unsynchronized BPL clusters that use the same freq band (depends on freq band and type of cable) Maximum number of nodes per cluster Maximum number of consecutive hops in a BPL chain. Factors are mainly technology limits that were extracted from experience, so conservative values were adopted for standard planning rules. 15
16
Assignment of backbone to every BPL cluster
4. Planning & deployment Assignment of backbone to every BPL cluster Every cluster must have at least 1 backbone connection. Backbones shall preferably be placed at the location of the Master device. The priority for backbone selection in BPL cells are: Optical Fiber xDSL/HFC 3G/2G mobile 16
17
Current planning rules: have demonstrated success!
4. Planning & deployment Current planning rules: have demonstrated success! Only underground MV Frequency bands: two modes (2-7 MHz [mode 1] and 8-18 MHz [mode 2]). No notching. Max distance Mode 1, ‘new’ cable: 1000 m Mode 2, ‘new’ cable: 700 m 1 m of ‘old’ cable = 2 m of ‘new’ cable Min ‘guard’ distance Mode 1, ‘new’ cable: 2000 m Mode 2, ‘new’ cable: 1500 m 1 m of ‘old’ cable = 1.5 m of ‘new’ cable Max 20 nodes per cluster (no less than 5) Max 9 hops in an ‘arm’ from the Master up to an slave 17
18
Actual BPL planning ‘process’
4. Planning & deployment Actual BPL planning ‘process’ Part of a generic ‘telecoms planning’ for every SS deployed as part of the Smart Grid/metering effort: gives a comms solution to each one. The whole network is divided into areas, which are further divided into sets of around 100 SS’s: that’s the unit for ‘planning’. An iterative algorithm -that proposes BPL planning over the 100 SS’s while using the 2 modes- then runs on the whole set, trying to maximize a certain “scoring” while complying to all of the planning criteria. Then a Master is selected for each cluster (center of masses approximately) and a backbone assigned. SS’ not covered by BPL get another technology (mostly 2G/3G). 18
19
19
20
20
21
21
22
¿GPRS? 22
24
BPL BPL Deployment Steps followed:
4. Planning & deployment BPL Deployment BPL Steps followed: Logistic process for selecting provider of BPL devices and couplers. Identification of Topology of BPL network (need for multi-injection). Integration of devices in cabinets. Commissioning of BPL technology according to manuals. 48-hour stress tests to validate correct performance. Continuous monitoring and supervision of stable performance. BPL Signal Quality. Alarms and performance reporting. Note: SS’s serviced with BPL do not transition to production (O&M) until all SS’s in the cluster have gone through step 5 above. They go into production as a ‘single unit’.
25
IMPLEMENTATION EXAMPLE: fiber optic backbone + BPL
4. Planning & deployment IMPLEMENTATION EXAMPLE: fiber optic backbone + BPL Secondary Substation (MV/LV) IBERDROLA NETWORK Optical Fiber Network MV BPL LV Lines Optical Fiber MV Line Coaxial Ethernet LV Line Filter RACK MV Switchgear MV Switchgear To other substation To other substation BPL Coupler MV Line BPL Coupler MV Line
26
IMPLEMENTATION EXAMPLE: 2G/3G+ BPL
4. Planning & deployment IMPLEMENTATION EXAMPLE: 2G/3G+ BPL Secondary Substation (MV/LV) IBERDROLA NETWORK 2G/3G TELCO NETWORK MV BPL LV Lines MV Line Coaxial Ethernet LV Line Filter RACK MV Cabinet MV Cabinet To other substation To other substation MV Line BPL Coupler BPL Coupler MV Line
27
Index 5 Real products
28
BPL Capacitive Couplers
5. Real products BPL Capacitive Couplers BPL Signal Coupling CAMT-5 CAMT-1 Air-insulated MV switchgear SF6-insulated MV switchgear … others being tested
29
BPL Capacitive Couplers Installation
5. Real products BPL Capacitive Couplers Installation BPL Signal Coupling CAPACITIVE (AIR) CAPACITIVE (SF6)
30
5. Real products Corinex Ormazabal 30
31
Also Huawei, ZIV… being tested
5. Real products Also Huawei, ZIV… being tested GE (Alstom) 31
32
Index 6 Remarks & Conclusions
33
BPL achieves better results than e.g. mobile 2G/3G:
6. Remarks & Conclusions … some final thoughts BPL achieves better results than e.g. mobile 2G/3G: Application throughputs <100 kbps against 2 Mbps (FW upgrade) Latency ms against ms Improved network availability Cost effective: comparable Gone with the practical approach: known OPERA technology (others: G.hn, IEEE 1901) High Availability (backbone) a possibility Cornerstone of Smart Grid scenario for underground MV networks. Understand not immediate to master, but interest is growing.
35
Thank you Please check my recently co-authored book:
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.