1. An Overview of Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto Robert L. Baechtold Nicholas M. Cannella Brian V. Slater Michael P. Sandonato Feng Xu

2. FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO © 2010 | www.fitzpatrickcella.com 1 Welcome 欢迎 我们即知产 飞泽知识产权律师所

3. FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO © 2009 | www.fitzpatrickcella.com 2 A Brief History  Founded in 1971 by 6 partners –Legal excellence driven –Meritocracy based  The 1970s: Engaged in high profile cases and legal matters for clients worldwide, such as Bristol-Myers and Canon.  The 1980s: Represented a wide range of industries in patent prosecution, litigation, and ITC proceedings. Successfully represented E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Co. in ITC 337 investigation against Dutch chemical giant Akzo N.V.  The 1990s: Expanded in all areas of IP law, from patent prosecution and litigation in the U.S. to trademark management in the global economy. Successfully litigated and prevailed on all issues in a complex ITC 337 investigation case over an anti-cancer drug (doxorubicin) involving multiple international companies in Asia, Europe and the U.S.  The 2000s: A firm with 170 IP attorneys, widely acknowledged as one of the premier IP firms in the country; continues to develop and serve clients globally.

4. FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO © 2009 | www.fitzpatrickcella.com 3 An Overview (1)  Consistently ranked as a top Intellectual Property law firm. –Ranked as a top U.S. Intellectual Property law firm by Chambers USA & Chambers Global –Named ACQ’s Patent Firm of Year, North America, 2009 –Ranked #1 in New York in Intellectual Property Today’s Top Patent Firms survey in the March 2009 issue. Ranked # 5 in the United States. –Canon and IBM named Fitzpatrick as a go-to firm in Corporate Counsels’ 2008 In-House Law Departments at the Leading Technology Companies Go-To Technology Guide –Named MIP’s Pharmaceutical IP Litigation Firm of the Year in 2008, 2009 and 2010 and Life Science/Biotech Firm of Year 2010

5. FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO © 2009 | www.fitzpatrickcella.com 4 An Overview (2)  Over 175 Attorneys in three offices –New York –Washington D.C. –California  Over 125 litigation attorneys  More than 50 patent prosecution attorneys  Close to 100 paralegals, docketing and other support staff  Primary practice areas –Intellectual property litigation –Patent Prosecution –Trademarks –Copyrights –Licensing & Transactions –Unfair Trade Practices –Pharmaceutical and Chemicals –Biotechnology –Electronics and Computers –E-Commerce & New Media –Nanotechnology –Interference

6. FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO © 2009 | www.fitzpatrickcella.com 5 A Broad Spectrum of Technical Expertise –Electrical/Mechanical Engineering (71) –Biology/Biochemistry/Biotechnology (51) –Chemistry (28) –Imaging Sciences/Physics (6) –Neuroscience/Neurobiology (3) –Pharmacology (1) –Molecular Biophysics (1) –Psychology (1) –Astronomy (1) –Technical expertise extends from partners to entry-level associates. –98% of FCHS attorneys have science or engineering degrees; 13 attorneys have Ph.D. degrees. –Nearly all of the litigation lawyers have pharmaceutical litigation experience (including Hatch- Waxman litigations)

7. FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO © 2009 | www.fitzpatrickcella.com 6 Our Clients  From North America, to Europe, to Asia  A long history with Asian clients –Canon –Astellas Pharma Inc. –Daiichi Sankyo –Eisai –Amgen –AstraZeneca –Bausch & Lomb –Bear USA –Bristol-Myers Squibb –Calvin Klein –The Clearing House –Conde Nast –Essilor International S.A. –Entegris –Frederick Warne & Co., Inc. –Genzyme –GlaxoSmithKline –Honeywell –Hughes Network Systems –IBM –Kyowa Hakko Kogyo –Medtronic –Merck –Novartis –Phillips-Van Heusen –Prudential –Reckitt Benckiser –Rohde & Schwarz –sanofi-aventis –Schaeffler KG –S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. –Sepracor –Sirona Dental Systems –St. John's University –Tellabs Operations, Inc. –UCB Pharma, Inc. –Warner Chilcott  A long, growing list of clients

8. FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO © 2009 | www.fitzpatrickcella.com 7 Litigation Practice (1)  Over 100 litigation attorneys; many have acted as lead counsel in major jury and bench trials  Hundreds of patent and trademarks disputes successfully litigated  Complex domestic and international IP litigation encompassing –Patents –Trademarks & Trade Dress –ITC Proceedings –Copyrights –Unfair Competition –Trade Secrets

9. FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO © 2009 | www.fitzpatrickcella.com 8 Litigation Practice (2)  We have appeared before federal and state courts throughout the country, the United States International Trade Commission, the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.  Technologies involved in litigation span virtually every segment of modern industry and commerce. –Pharmaceuticals –Specialty Chemicals –Computer Hardware –Software/Internet –Mechanical Devices

10. FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO © 2009 | www.fitzpatrickcella.com 9 Litigation Practice (3)  Representative Cases (2008-2010) –AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and AstraZeneca UK Ltd., v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd and Sandoz, Inc. Fed. Cir. 2009 –Sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi-aventis, and Debiopharm S.A. v. Sandoz, Inc. et al. Fed. Cir. 2009 –Unigene Labs., Inc., and Upsher-Smith Labs, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc., et al. S.D.N.Y., 2009 –In re: Halftone Color Separations ('809) Patent Litigation (Screentone Systems Corp., et al. v. Canon U.S.A., Inc., et al.) C.D.CA, 2009 –Daiichi Sankyo Company, Ltd., et al. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al. D.N.J., 2009 –Amgen Inc. v. Human Genome Sciences, Inc. and Schering Corp.Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences –Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc., d/b/a The Conde Nast Publications, Bacardi & Co., Ltd., Sidney Frank Importing Company, and EventQuest, LLC v. Jay Norris, Norris/Nelson Entertainment, Inc. and Tastemakers Media, LLC S.D.N.Y. 2008 –Sanofi-Synthelabo, et al. v. Apotex, Inc. Fed. Cir., 2008 –M Ship Co., LLC v. Ice Marine LTD. S.D.Fl. 2008 –Merck & Co., Inc. v. Apotex Inc., et al. Fed. Cir., 2008 –Nano-Proprietary, Inc. v. Canon Inc. 5th Cir. 2008 –Spath v Geyer Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences 2008 –Schaeffler KG v. Brastates Bearings Industries, et al. S.D.Fl., 2008

11. FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO © 2009 | www.fitzpatrickcella.com 10 Our Litigating Principles and Promises –Close involvement of client at all phases –Always be available and responsive to client –Use firm-wide experience as a resource –Select attorneys for a case based on legal and technical expertise –Anticipate issues and potential problems before they occur –Understand and implement client’s business objectives –Be efficient and cost-effective –Intellectual property isn’t just a practice area, it is our practice.

12. FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO © 2009 | www.fitzpatrickcella.com 11 Expertise in Working with International Clients –Understand unique business models and needs –Customize IP strategies –Overcome cultural differences and client’s lack of U.S. litigation experience –Representative cases for Asian clients –Daiichi Sankyo Company, Ltd., et al. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al. D.N.J., 2009 –Nano-Proprietary, Inc. v. Canon Inc. 5th Cir. 2008 –Astellas Pharma Inc., et al. v. Ranboxy Inc., et al. D.N.J. 2007 –Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. V. Danbury Pharmaceutical, Inc. Fed. Cir. 2000 –Firm Foreign Language Expertise –Chinese –Croatian –German –French –Hebrew –Hindi –Indonesian –Japanese –Norwegian –Russian –Spanish –Swahili –Tamil –Telugu –Vietnamese

13. FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO © 2009 | www.fitzpatrickcella.com 12 Prosecution Practice (1) –Over 50 experienced patent prosecution attorneys, including many former USPTO Examiners –20,000 utility and design applications prosecuted to issuance in the past 10 years; 1,649 patents issued in 2009 –Our prosecution group has successfully prosecuted patents in all technologies—including the electronic, software, chemical, biotechnology and mechanical arts—for clients ranging from Fortune 100 corporations to internet start-ups. –Leverage our broad litigation and licensing experience to obtain patents that can be effectively licensed or enforced against infringers –Specialized and sophisticated areas –Interference proceedings –Prosecution of reissue applications –Ex parte and inter partes reexaminations of issued U.S. Patents.

14. FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO © 2009 | www.fitzpatrickcella.com 13 Prosecution Practice (2) Overview FCHS has a centralized docketing system with checks and balances –The Docketing Department receives, processes, dockets and distributes both client and USPTO correspondence. –The Docketing Department also checks USPTO filings. –Clients and our attorneys may review patent prosecution docket entries through a central database.

15. FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO © 2009 | www.fitzpatrickcella.com 14 Prosecution Practice (3) Client US Patent Office Centralized FCHS Docketing DC Docketing FCHS DC Attorneys FCHS CA Attorneys FCHS NY Attorneys CA Docketing  Incoming Correspondence with FCHS –Client correspondence sent to Central Docketing –USPTO correspondence sent to Central Docketing  Outgoing Correspondence from FCHS –Correspondence with Clients –Correspondence with USPTO

16. FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO © 2009 | www.fitzpatrickcella.com 15 Q & A

17. FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO © 2009 | www.fitzpatrickcella.com 16 NEW YORK 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10104-3800 212.218.2100 WASHINGTON 975 F Street, NW Washington, DC 20004-1405 202.530.1010 CALIFORNIA 650 Town Center Drive, Suite 2000 Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7130 714.540.8700