1. C. Guerrero “A first look to capture with fission tagging” n_TOF Analysis Meeting, CERN 23-24 November 2010 A first look to capture with fission tagging (TAC+MGAS) C. Guerrero (CERN)

2. C. Guerrero “A first look to capture with fission tagging” n_TOF Analysis Meeting, CERN 23-24 November 2010 The Letter or Intent submitted to INTC (Nov. 2009) 3 MGAS detectors each equipped with a 1 mg 235 U sample Signal+Mesh HV (drift) TAC MGAS The experimental set-up combines the use of the TAC (for capture) with a total of three MGAS (for fission) detectors loaded with 235 U samples. The detectors and samples were already used in 2009 (for monitoring purposes) The long MGAS chamber has been designed and constructed at CERN.

3. C. Guerrero “A first look to capture with fission tagging” n_TOF Analysis Meeting, CERN 23-24 November 2010 Design and construction of the fission tagging chamber The chamber has been designed and constructed at CERN in collaboration with Damien Grenier and Vincent Barozier. He at atmospheric pressure Kapton windows Connectors Vacuum valve Gas entrance/exit

4. C. Guerrero “A first look to capture with fission tagging” n_TOF Analysis Meeting, CERN 23-24 November 2010 Design and construction of the fission tagging chamber The chamber has been designed and constructed at CERN in collaboration with Damien Grenier and Vincent Barozier. Separators Sample assembly

5. C. Guerrero “A first look to capture with fission tagging” n_TOF Analysis Meeting, CERN 23-24 November 2010 Design and construction of the fission tagging chamber The samples are mounted in the Class-A lab of ISOLDE (B.179) The SAFETY FILE describing the detectors, the samples, risks and measures, usage procedures, etc. is available in EDMS: https://edms.cern.ch/document/1097338/1

6. C. Guerrero “A first look to capture with fission tagging” n_TOF Analysis Meeting, CERN 23-24 November 2010 Experimental set-up The experiment was carried out after the 241 Am with the TAC, thus the set-up for the BaF 2 is that of the 241 AM measurement (250 MSamples/s) The MESH signals from the three MGAS detectors were preamplifier, amplified and the plugged into the DAQ (100 MSamples/s) named FTMG #1, #2 and #3.

7. C. Guerrero “A first look to capture with fission tagging” n_TOF Analysis Meeting, CERN 23-24 November 2010 Experimental set-up The experiment was carried out after the 241 Am with the TAC, thus the set-up for the BaF 2 is that of the 241 AM measurement (250 MSamples/s) The MESH signals from the three MGAS detectors were preamplifier, amplified and the plugged into the DAQ (100 MSamples/s) named FTMG #1, #2 and #3.

8. C. Guerrero “A first look to capture with fission tagging” n_TOF Analysis Meeting, CERN 23-24 November 2010 Analysis of TAC and MGAS 1.Time and energy calibration of the TAC modules using a 88 Y source. 2.Coincidence (  coinc =20 ns ) in the TAC to convert “signals” into “events”. 3.Create ROOT files with “nt_baf2” and “nt_ftmg” for each run. 4.Loop over each MGAS detector looking for coincidences (  coinc =50 ns ) in the TAC 25 ns Random coincidences?

9. C. Guerrero “A first look to capture with fission tagging” n_TOF Analysis Meeting, CERN 23-24 November 2010 Analysis of TAC and MGAS 1.Time and energy calibration of the TAC modules using a 88 Y source. 2.Coincidence (  coinc =20 ns ) in the TAC to convert “signals” into “events”. 3.Create ROOT files with “nt_baf2” and “nt_ftmg” for each run. 4.Loop over each MGAS detector looking for coincidences (  coinc =50 ns ) in the TAC

10. C. Guerrero “A first look to capture with fission tagging” n_TOF Analysis Meeting, CERN 23-24 November 2010 Analysis of TAC and MGAS 1)Time and energy calibration of the TAC modules using a 88 Y source. 2)Coincidence (  coinc =20 ns ) in the TAC to convert “signals” into “events”. 3)Create ROOT files with “nt_baf2” and “nt_ftmg” for each run. 4)Loop over each MGAS detector looking for coincidences (  coinc =50 ns ) in the TAC Questions at this stage: 1. There is a coincidence in the TAC for 85% of the MGAS fission signal (77% for conditions E sum >1 MeV and m cr >1). Is this figure reasonable? 2. It is known that ~7% of the prompt fission radiation is emitted with a delay of 20 to 100 ns. How can we take this into account ? (background events could trigger the coincidence before) 3. Shall we worry about the background from neutron emission? ( The travel time from the sample to the crystals (15 cm) is 10  s for 1 eV and 100 ns for 10 keV)

11. C. Guerrero “A first look to capture with fission tagging” n_TOF Analysis Meeting, CERN 23-24 November 2010 Preliminary results from TAC+MGAS: Deposited Energy 235 U(n,  ) sum peak

12. C. Guerrero “A first look to capture with fission tagging” n_TOF Analysis Meeting, CERN 23-24 November 2010 Preliminary results from TAC+MGAS: Deposited Energy 235 U(n,  ) sum peak

13. C. Guerrero “A first look to capture with fission tagging” n_TOF Analysis Meeting, CERN 23-24 November 2010 Preliminary results from TAC+MGAS: Neutron Energy

14. C. Guerrero “A first look to capture with fission tagging” n_TOF Analysis Meeting, CERN 23-24 November 2010 Preliminary results from TAC+MGAS: Neutron Energy

15. C. Guerrero “A first look to capture with fission tagging” n_TOF Analysis Meeting, CERN 23-24 November 2010 Preliminary results from TAC+MGAS: Neutron Energy Ba resonances x X resonances

16. C. Guerrero “A first look to capture with fission tagging” n_TOF Analysis Meeting, CERN 23-24 November 2010 Preliminary results from TAC+MGAS: Neutron Energy Ba resonances x X resonances Very large neutron scattering background: where is it coming from?

17. C. Guerrero “A first look to capture with fission tagging” n_TOF Analysis Meeting, CERN 23-24 November 2010 Preliminary results from TAC+MGAS: Neutron Energy It was not possible to make a good vacuum in the chamber, and hence the “empty” measurement was not successful.

18. C. Guerrero “A first look to capture with fission tagging” n_TOF Analysis Meeting, CERN 23-24 November 2010 Conclusions Capture dominated resonances High fission contribution We have measured for the first time at n_TOF simultaneous neutron capture and fission: (Design and construction of the fission chamber at CERN) The use of thin target has allowed to measure in “veto” mode, thus obtaining nice “fission-clean “ events in the TAC.

19. C. Guerrero “A first look to capture with fission tagging” n_TOF Analysis Meeting, CERN 23-24 November 2010 Conclusions We have measured for the first time at n_TOF simultaneous neutron capture and fission: (Design and construction of the fission chamber at CERN) The use of thin target has allowed to measure in “veto” mode, thus obtaining nice “fission-clean “ events in the TAC. Following a very preliminary analysis, there are several open questions: 1)There is a coincidence in the TAC for 85% of the MGAS fission signal (77% for conditions E sum >1 MeV and m cr >1). Is this “efficiency” reasonable? 2)It is known that ~7% of the prompt fission radiation is emitted with a delay of 20 to 100 ns. How can we take this into account ? (background events could trigger the coincidence before) 3)Shall we worry about the background from neutron emission? (The travel time from the sample to the crystals (15 cm) is 10  s for 1 eV and 100 ns for 10 keV) 4)Where is the high neutron scattering background coming from? Gas? Backings? Vacuum windows? 5)Is it worth running with the neutron absorber? (available data to be analyzed) 6)Shall we foresee any modification of the chamber and the set-up? 7)[…]