Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

No Evidence for Recent Abacavir/Lamivudine Use in Promoting Inflammation, Endothelial Dysfunction, Hypercoagulability, or Insulin Resistance in Virologically.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "No Evidence for Recent Abacavir/Lamivudine Use in Promoting Inflammation, Endothelial Dysfunction, Hypercoagulability, or Insulin Resistance in Virologically."— Presentation transcript:

1 No Evidence for Recent Abacavir/Lamivudine Use in Promoting Inflammation, Endothelial Dysfunction, Hypercoagulability, or Insulin Resistance in Virologically Suppressed HIV-infected patients: A Sub-study of the BICOMBO Randomized Clinical Trial E. Martínez, M. Larrousse, I. Pérez, M. Loncá, D. Podzamczer, F. Gutiérrez, R. Deulofeu, R. Casamitjana, J.C. Reverter, J. Mallolas, J. Pich, J.M. Gatell, for the BICOMBO Study Group SPAIN

2 ABACAVIR AND CV DISEASE
Abacavir use identified as a marker of cardiovascular disease in several cohort studies (1-3), although it is currently unclear whether its role is causative or not. Potential pathogenetic mechanisms are also unclear. Abacavir has not been asociated with insulin resistance (4) or lipoatrophy (4, 5) and its lipid impact is lower than that of stavudine (5) or protease inhibitors (6), although higher than that of tenofovir (7). Several potential mechanisms affecting biological mechanisms associated with cardiovascular dysfunction have been suggested (6-8) but studies to date may have been subjected to bias. 1. D:A:D Study Group. Lancet 2008; 371: 2. The SMART/INSIGHT and the D:A:D Study Groups. AIDS 2008; 22: F17-F24 3. Obel N, et al. HIV Medicine 2009 (Epub ahead of print) 4. Shlay JC, et al. JAIDS 2005; 38: 5. Podzamczer D, et al. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007; 44: 6. Martinez E, et al. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 7. Smith KY, et al. AIDS 2009; 23: 6. Hsue PY, et al. AIDS. 2009; 23: 7. Satchell C, et al. 16th CROI, Montreal, Canada. Abstract 151LB 8. Kristoffersen US, et al. HIV Medicine 2009 (Epub ahead of print)

3 D:A:D STUDY: ABC, TDF, and MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
Cumm. use Recent use 1.9 1.5 1.5 RR yes/no 95%CI 1.2 1.2 RR per year 95%CI ** 1 1 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 ZDV ddI ddC d4T 3TC ABC TDF #PYFU: 138,109 74,407 29,676 95,320 152,009 53,300 39,157 #MI: 523 331 148 405 554 221 139 J Lundgren & DAD Study Group et al CROI 2009 LB abstr 44

4 MECHANISMS FOR MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
TDF 3 Initiation Progression Complication Inflammation Endothelial dysfunction Insulin resistance Hypercoagulability ABC 1-3 1. D:A:D Study Group. Lancet 2008. 2. The SMART/INSIGHT and the D:A:D Study Groups. AIDS 2008. 3. D:A:D Study Group. CROI 2009.

5 POTENTIAL SOURCES OF CONFOUNDING AND BIAS
Drug prescription not random Pre-existing CV disease or DM Uncontrolled HIV infection or AIDS

6 BICOMBO STUDY DESIGN Primary Analysis, Week 48
Patients randomized (n=335) PI=34 NNRTI=301 Stable 3TC-based ART for > 6 months HIV-RNA < 200c/mL No HLA screening ABC/3TC (n=167) TDF/FTC (n=168) Excluded (n=0) Excluded (n=2) ABC/3TC (n=167) TDF/FTC (n=166) Primary Analysis, Week 48 Discontinue ABC/3TC (n=30, 18%) Discontinue TDF/FTC (n=22, 13%) Continue on ABC/3TC (n=137, 82%) * Continue on TDF/FTC (n=144, 87%) * 1 patient with virological failure and 1 with a new AIDS event Martinez E et al. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2009.

7 Endothelial dysfunction
METHODS Patients Baseline and 48w serum samples available No history of symptomatic CV disease or DM No virological failure or AIDS events during follow-up Laboratory markers Statistical analyses Wilcoxon rank Sum test for comparisons Punctual estimation and 95% confidence interval of difference in medians (methodology of Hodges-Lehman, using the distribution-free of Moses). Spearman test for correlations Initiation Progression Complication Inflammation Endothelial dysfunction Insulin resistance Hypercoagulability hsCRP, MCP-1 OPG, IL-6 TNF-alpha IL-10 D-dimer ICAM-1, VCAM-1 Selectin E, Selectin P Adiponectin, Insulin

8 POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
BICOMBO Sub-study BICOMBO Study ABC/3TC (n=46) TDF/FTC (n=34) Patients in the Sub-study (n=80) Patients not in the Sub-study (n=253) Age (years) 44 (39-52) 42 (37-49) 43 (38-48) Male gender (n, %) 38 (82.6) 26 (76.5) 64 (80.0) 195 (77.1) Years of ART 4.5 ( ) 3.7 ( ) 3.9 ( ) 3.9 ( ) PI at baseline (n, %) 4 (8.7) 2 (5.9) 6 (7.5) 24 (9.5) Active smoker (n, %) 12 (26.1) 8 (23.5) 20 (25.0) 68 (26.9) Systolic BP (mmHg) 125 ( ) 122 ( ) 124 ( ) 125 ( ) Total chol (mg/dL) 205 ( ) 205 ( ) 205 ( ) 205 ( ) HDL chol (mg/dL) 49 (44-64) 50 (41-61) 49 (42-63) 49 (42-62) Framingham score 5.5 ( ) 3.8 ( ) 4.4 ( ) 4.3 ( ) P>0.05 for all comparisons between groups (ABC/3TC vs TDF/FTC) in the Sub-study. P>0.05 for all comparisons between patients in the Sub-study vs patients from the BICOMBO study not in the Sub-study.

9 BIOMARKERS AT BASELINE and 48 WEEKS
Median laboratory marker (units) ABC/3TC (n=46) TDF/FTC (n=34) P value for comparisons between baseline values P value for comparisons between 48 week values Baseline 48 weeks hsCRP (mg/L) 0.13 0.14 0.10 0.91 MCP-1 (pg/mL) 76 71 83 87 0.27 0.17 OPG (pmol/L) 4.1 4.2 4.3 0.89 0.56 IL-6 (pg/mL) 0.70 1 IL-10 (pg/mL) 3.9 0.47 0.42 TNF- (pg/mL) 1.6 0.54 ICAM-1 (ng/mL) 198 188 194 213 0.58 0.45 VCAM-1 (ng/mL) 394 372 410 413 0.43 0.22 Selectin E (ng/mL ) 119 115 121 126 0.92 0.44 Selectin P (ng/mL) 114 104 122 0.28 0.69 Insulin (mU/L) 8.9 8.3 9.7 10.3 0.18 Adiponectin (g/mL) 8.0 7.8 9.6 0.40 0.33 D-dimer (mg/L) 0.20 0.21 0.06 0.24

10 CORRELATIONS BETWEEN BASELINE PARAMETERS
Spearman Correlation Coefficient P-value Selectin E – Selectin P 0.63 <0.0001 ICAM-1 – VCAM-1 0.51 OPG – Adiponectin 0.29 0.015 Insulin - Adiponectin -0.25 0.030 Spearman Correlation Coefficient P-value Framingham – OPG 0.31 0.008 Framingham – Selectin E 0.29 0.016 Framingham – Selectin P 0.26 0.032

11 CHANGE IN BIOMARKERS FROM BASELINE TO 48 WEEKS
Median Laboratory marker (units) ABC/3TC (n=46) TDF/FTC (n=34) P value for comparisons between absolute changes P value for comparisons between percent changes Median difference of percent change ABC/3TC minus TDF/FTC [lower confidence interval, upper confidence interval] Percent change hsCRP (mg/L) -3.9 0.0 0.76 0.26 26.4 [-15.4, 100] MCP-1 (pg/mL) 5.9 4 0.35 0.52 9.5 [-14.2, 30.4] OPG (pmol/L) 5.1 -2.8 0.51 0.59 2.9 [-8.7, 14.4] IL-6 (pg/mL) 0.49 0 [0, 0] IL-10 (pg/mL) 0.11 0.12 0 [0, 2] TNF- (pg/mL) 0.28 0.31 ICAM-1 (ng/mL) 6.6 5.2 0.65 0.84 -15.9 [-17.1,16.2] VCAM-1 (ng/mL) 0.02 -0.01 0.88 0.73 -0.02 [-0.16, 0.11] Selectin E (ng/mL ) -0.4 7.8 0.19 0.13 -8.5 [-17.3, 2.1] Selectin P (ng/mL) 4.6 12.6 0.37 0.33 -7.9 [-21.3, 6.3] Insulin (mU/L) -2.5 8.8 0.67 0.69 7.4 [-27.9, 38.4] Adiponectin (g/mL) -2.2 15.4 0.10 -15.9 [-36.3, 4.0] D-dimer (mg/L) 0.00 0 [-18.0, 5.6]

12 CHANGE IN HIGH-SENSITIVITY CRP
Because hsCRP is the marker with more widespread clinical use, we performed additional analyses. Absolute hsCRP increase at 48 weeks: 18(39%) and 11 (32%) patients in the ABC/3TC and TDF/FTC groups respectively (P=0.62). hsCRP higher than 0.5 mg/dL at 48 weeks: 4(9%) and 1 (3%) patients in the ABC/3TC and TDF/FTC groups respectively (P=0.39). hsCRP increase at 48 weeks 25% higher than that at the baseline: 16(35%) and 9 (26%) patients in the ABC/3TC and TDF/FTC groups respectively (P=0.61). 12

13 CONCLUSIONS In otherwise healthy, virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients from the BICOMBO study, the initiation of ABC/3TC did not lead to significant changes after 48 weeks in markers of inflammation, endothelial dysfuntion, insulin resistance, or hypercoagulability as compared with the initiation of TDF/FTC. These results argue against any of these mechanisms as involved in the higher risk of MI associated with recent ABC use in some cohort studies. 13

14 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Supported in part by research grants from Gilead Sciences and GlaxoSmithKline Participating centers and investigators (in alphabetical order): Hospital de Bellvitge, L’Hospitalet (Patricia Barragán, Elena Ferrer, Daniel Iñiguez, Gabriela Leibenger, Daniel Podzamczer) Hospital Clínic, Barcelona (Mireia Arnedo, José L Blanco, Marta Calvo, José M Gatell, Montserrat Laguno, María Larrouse, Agathe León, Montserrat Loncá, Josep Mallolas, Esteban Martínez, María Martínez, Ana Milinkovic, José M. Miró, Tomás Pumarola) Hospital Clínico de San Carlos, Madrid (Mónica Fuster, Victor Roca†) Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Elche (Enrique Bernal, Félix Gutiérrez, Mar Masiá, Sergio Padilla). Hospital Germans Trías i Pujol, IrsiCaixa Foundation, Badalona (Isabel Bravo, Bonaventura Clotet, Patricia Echeverría). Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid (Juan Berenguer, Jaime Cosín, Isabel Gutiérrez, Margarita Ramírez, Matilde Sánchez) Hospital Universitari de Tarragona Joan XXIII, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona (Joaquim Peraire, Francesc Vidal) Hospital del Mar, Barcelona (Hernando Knobel, Alicia González) Hospital de Mataró, Mataró (Luis Force, Pilar Barrufet) Hospital de Mútua de Terrassa, Terrassa (Mireia Cairó, David Dalmau, Carol García) Hospital Parc Taulí, Sabadell (Esperanza Antón, Eva Penelo, Ferran Segura) Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid (José R Arribas, Juan Miguel Castro, María Montes) Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid (Raquel Carrillo, Ignacio de los Santos) Hospital Príncipe de Asturias, Alcalá de Henares (Jose A Arranz, Esperanza Casas, Julio de Miguel, José Sanz) Hospital Sant Jaume, Calella (Josep M Llibre, Silvia Valero) Hospital Son Llàtzer, Palma de Mallorca (Antoni Payeras) Hospital de Sierrallana, Torrelavega (Francisco Galo) Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona (Esteban Ribera, Adrià Curran) Special thanks to study patients 14

15


Download ppt "No Evidence for Recent Abacavir/Lamivudine Use in Promoting Inflammation, Endothelial Dysfunction, Hypercoagulability, or Insulin Resistance in Virologically."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google