Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

CONTRIBUTION OF CHROMOSOME BANDING AND MOLECULAR CYTOGENETIC ANALYSES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF SOFT TISSUE AND BONE TUMORS OVER A 6-YEAR-PERIOD Manuel Teixeira,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "CONTRIBUTION OF CHROMOSOME BANDING AND MOLECULAR CYTOGENETIC ANALYSES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF SOFT TISSUE AND BONE TUMORS OVER A 6-YEAR-PERIOD Manuel Teixeira,"— Presentation transcript:

1 CONTRIBUTION OF CHROMOSOME BANDING AND MOLECULAR CYTOGENETIC ANALYSES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF SOFT TISSUE AND BONE TUMORS OVER A 6-YEAR-PERIOD Manuel Teixeira, MD, PhD Head of Department of Genetics Carlos Lopes, MD, PhD Department of Pathology Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal

2

3

4 Differential diagnosis: Small round cell tumors
Tumor type Cytogenetics Genes Ewing’s sarcoma/PNET t(11;22)(q24;q12) t(21;22)(q22;q12) FLI1/EWS ERG/EWS Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma t(2;13)(q35;q14) t(1;13)(p36;q14) PAX3/FKHR PAX7/FKHR Desmopl. small round cell t. t(11;22)(p13;q12) WT1/EWS Neuroblastoma del(1p), hsr, dmin MYCN Non-Hodgkin lymphoma Typical changes IG/V, TCR/V

5 Ewing’s sarcoma/PNET 3’EWS 5’EWS

6 Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma with PAX7-FKHR Bone marow; no primary tumor found

7 Differential diagnosis: Lipomatous tumors
Tumor type Cytogenetics Lipoma 12q13~15 changes 6p changes 13q deletions Atypical lipoma/WD liposarcoma +r/mar Lipoblastoma 8q11~13 changes Fusocellular lipoma 16q13~qter deletions  Hybernoma 11q13~21 changes  Liposarcoma - myxoid/round cell t(12;16)(q13;p11) - pleomorphic Complex changes

8 Atypical lipoma/Well-differentiated liposarcoma
Ampl. MDM2/CDK4 5’CHOP 3’CHOP

9 Myxoid/round cell liposarcoma
5’CHOP 3’CHOP

10 Differential diagnosis: Fusocellular sarcomas
Tumor type Cytogenetics Synovial sarcoma t(X;18)(p11;q11) Fibrosarcoma Complex karyotype Malign. perypheral nerve sheath t.

11 Synovial sarcoma 5’SYT 3’SYT

12 Types of genetic findings and their relevance for differential diagnosis
Apr Mar. 2007 N=163/614

13 Patients with a pathognomonic genetic finding

14 Desagreement rate in patients with a pathognomonic genetic finding
2 ERMS Extraskel. myxoid chondrosarcoma 2 lipomas, 2 myxoid lipos; 1 MSFT Small cell osteos. 1 myxoid lipos; 1 sarcoma NOS

15 Patients with informative but not pathognomonic genetic findings

16 Patients with informative genetic findings decisive for differential diagnosis

17 Patients with informative genetic findings compatible with morphologic diagnosis

18 Patients with informative genetic findings not compatible with morphologic diagnosis

19 Conclusions 42% of the tumors with genetic changes presented a pathognomonic chromosome alteration Additional 25% of the tumors with genetic changes had an informative result for differential diagnosis In 16% of the tumors presenting a pathognomonic chromosome change, the initial morphologic diagnosis was changed as a result of the cytogenetic finding The tumor types that benefited most from the cytogenetic data for their correct diagnosis were alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, well differentiated liposarcoma, synovial sarcoma, Ewing’s sarcoma, and myxoid liposarcoma

20 Thanks!


Download ppt "CONTRIBUTION OF CHROMOSOME BANDING AND MOLECULAR CYTOGENETIC ANALYSES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF SOFT TISSUE AND BONE TUMORS OVER A 6-YEAR-PERIOD Manuel Teixeira,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google