1. How Noise Distraction Affects Performance on Math Test Based on Difficulty Phoebe Torchia Binghamton University Psychology 344

2. Introduction Background noise has the ability to distract listeners from tasks and decrease efficacy Background noise pulls attention because of the urgency to see if there’s a necessary response Factors that contribute to distraction: frequency, variation, amplitude, etc. Sound is heard involuntarily Research on noise distraction is important in order to optimize learning environments Our Hypothesis: Students will score significantly less well on the difficult exam during the distraction trial, but the distraction will not significantly affect results on the easy exam

3. Methods Participants: 60 Undergraduate Psychology Students from Binghamton University Apparatus: Four math tests distributed in four conditions (A1,A2,B1,B2) A1 (easy) and A2 (difficult) were two math tests administered without a distraction B2 (easy) and B2 (difficult) were two math tests administered with a distraction (cell phone ringing) Design: 2x2 between subjects design Half of participants in no distraction condition, half of participants distraction condition IV1: Distraction IV2: Difficulty of Exam DV: Exam Results Both trials were given seven minutes to complete a math exam, half of the participants in each trial had a difficult exam, half of the participants in each trial had an easy exam. Trial 1 had no distraction, Trial 2 had a cell phone distracting every two minutes throughout the trial

4. Results Two-Way ANOVA test – No significant differences between trials – Distraction did not impact test results in a significant way – Only significance was the mean number correct for the easy trial vs. the mean number correct for the difficult trial

5. Discussion Results showed that our hypothesis was incorrect, there was no significant difference in test scores due to the distraction Both the easy group and the difficult groups performed better in the distraction trial than in the non distraction trial Our findings were inconsistent with previous research done on noise distraction – Possible reasons: too small of a sample size, not enough of a distraction

6. References Banbury, Simon P.; Tremblay, Sébastien; Macken, William J.; Jones, Dylan M.; Auditory Distraction and Short Term Memory: Phenomena and Practical Implications. Human Factors, Vol 43(1), Spr 2001 pp. 12-29. Publisher: Human Factors & Ergonomics Society; [Journal Article] Beaman, C. Philip; Auditory Distraction from low-intensity noise: a review of the consequences for learning and workplace environments. Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol 19(8), Dec, 2005 pp. 1041-1064. Publisher: John Wiley & Sons; [Journal Article] Forster, Peter M.; Grierson, Arthur T.; Noise and attentional selectivity: A reproducible phenomenon? British Journal of Psychology, Vol 69(4), Nov, 1978 pp. 489-498. Publisher: British Psychological Society; [Journal Article]44 Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C.; Smiley, Donna Fisher; Muenchen, Robert A.; Konrad, Tiffany N.; Acceptable Noise Level: Reliability Measures and Comparison to Preference for Background Sounds. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, Vol 17(9), Oct, 2006 pp. 640-648. Publisher: American Academy of Audiology; [Journal Article] Reynolds, James; McClelland, Alastair; Furnham, Adrian; An investigation of cognitive test performance across conditions of silence, background noise and music as a function of neuroticism. Anxiety, Stress & Coping: An International Journal, Vol 27(4), Jul, 2014 pp. 410-421. Publisher: Taylor & Francis; [Journal Article]An investigation of cognitive test performance across conditions of silence, background noise and music as a function of neuroticism. Wetzel, Nicole; Widmann, Andreas; Schröger, Erich; Distraction and facilitation—two faces of the same coin?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol 38(3), Jun, 2012 pp. 664-674. Publisher: American Psychological Association; [Journal Article]Distraction and facilitation—two faces of the same coin? Zeamer, Charlotte; Fox Tree, Jean E.; The process of auditory distraction: Disrupted attention and impaired recall in a simulated lecture environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol 39(5), Sep, 2013 pp. 1463-1472. Publisher: American Psychological Association; [Journal Article]The process of auditory distraction: Disrupted attention and impaired recall in a simulated lecture environment.