1. Date of download: 7/2/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: The Effect of Axial Length on Laser Spot Size and Laser Irradiance Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(9):1323-1328. doi:10.1001/archopht.119.9.1323 Image of the scale of half circles as obtained using the 40° field of the fundus camera (CF-60 UV; Canon, Tokyo, Japan). Figure Legend:

2. Date of download: 7/2/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: The Effect of Axial Length on Laser Spot Size and Laser Irradiance Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(9):1323-1328. doi:10.1001/archopht.119.9.1323 Actual magnification of the fundus image at different axial length values using the 40° field of the fundus camera (CF-60 UV; Canon, Tokyo, Japan) and of the scanning laser ophthalmoscope(SLO 101; Rodenstock Instruments, Düsseldorf, Germany). The magnification of the scanning laser ophthalmoscope is divided by 10 to be in a comparable range. Figure Legend:

3. Date of download: 7/2/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: The Effect of Axial Length on Laser Spot Size and Laser Irradiance Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(9):1323-1328. doi:10.1001/archopht.119.9.1323 Actual laser spot magnification of the Mainster Standard and the Mainster Wide Field laser lenses (Ocular Instruments, Bellevue, Wash) at different axial length values. Figure Legend:

4. Date of download: 7/2/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: The Effect of Axial Length on Laser Spot Size and Laser Irradiance Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(9):1323-1328. doi:10.1001/archopht.119.9.1323 Variation of spot sizes calculated with the fixed-magnification factor for fundus images obtained at different axial length values. Measurements were obtained using the fundus camera (CF-60 UV; Canon, Tokyo, Japan) and the scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO 101; Rodenstock Instruments, Düsseldorf, Germany). Figure Legend:

5. Date of download: 7/2/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: The Effect of Axial Length on Laser Spot Size and Laser Irradiance Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(9):1323-1328. doi:10.1001/archopht.119.9.1323 Differences between the spot sizes calculated from the images obtained with the fundus imaging systems and the spot size setting of the photodynamic therapy laser when using the Mainster Standard lens (Ocular Instruments, Bellevue, Wash). Figure Legend:

6. Date of download: 7/2/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: The Effect of Axial Length on Laser Spot Size and Laser Irradiance Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(9):1323-1328. doi:10.1001/archopht.119.9.1323 Differences between the spot sizes calculated from the images obtained with the fundus imaging systems and the spot size setting of the photodynamic therapy laser when using the Mainster Wide Field lens (Ocular Instruments, Bellevue, Wash). Figure Legend:

7. Date of download: 7/2/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: The Effect of Axial Length on Laser Spot Size and Laser Irradiance Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(9):1323-1328. doi:10.1001/archopht.119.9.1323 Variation of laser power when treating a spot size of 4 mm at different axial length values. Measurements were obtained using the Mainster Standard and Wide Field lenses (Ocular Instruments, Bellevue, Wash). Figure Legend: