1. Where is Space? And Why Does That Matter? Bhavya Lal, Ph.D. Research Staff Member Emily Nightingale, Science Policy Fellow Science and Technology Policy Institute, 1899 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington DC 20006 November 5, 2014 1

2. Agenda Why is this an important question? What are some technical answers? Why have we not wanted to answer the question? Has anything changed since we last visited the question? 2

3. SOME TECHNICAL ANSWERS 3

4. 50 mi (80 km)? Roughly the point at which aerodynamic control surfaces are no longer useful Set through testing of the X-15 4

5. 62.5 mi (100 km)? Karman line - A vehicle at this point (which can be between 53-60 mi depending on air density) would have to fly faster than orbital velocity to derive sufficient aerodynamic lift from the atmosphere to support itself. As certain parameters, such as solar flux, magnetic index, and others are varied, the calculated altitude varies. However, the boundary to space is set at 100 km for ease of use. This is the most common and internationally used boundary, and was also the target altitude used by the Ansari X-Prize to build and launch a “spacecraft” 5

6. 73 mi (118 km)? The midpoint of gradual transition over tens of kilometers from relatively gentle winds of the Earth’s atmosphere to more violent flows of charged particles in space. As found with the Supra-Thermal Ion Imager measuring ion collision frequency and ion cyclotron frequency – Study examined space between 100km and 150 km. – There is a gradual transition from magnetospheric to thermospheric control. – This area is important because it affects the transition of an object from aeronautic to astronautic flight control. – Found by Sangelli et Al., but not functionally used by an organization 6

7. 76 mi (122 km)? Boundary used by NASA Mission Control as the point of reentry and at which atmospheric drag becomes noticeable. There is not one single point at which atmospheric drag because noticeable because it depends on the object NASA uses this demarcation because it is the altitude at which the shuttle changed from astronautical control with thrusters to aeronautical control via air surfaces. 7

8. 80-93 mi (129-150 km)? The US Army training documents refer to the 80-93 miles zones as the lowest perigee attainable by an orbiting space vehicle. 80 miles is the lowest altitude at which an object in an elliptical orbit can complete at least one full revolution without propulsion and 93 miles is the lowest orbit an object in circular orbit can complete one full revolution. The lowest recorded orbit for a satellite was the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory that orbited the Earth one last time before reentry at a perigee of 93 miles in 1999. However this perigee is not sustainable for more than one full orbit around Earth (Harwood 2000). This orbit is unsustainable. In fact, it is not until 200 miles that an object can orbit without propulsion and not reenter Earth’s atmosphere (Army Space Reference Text). 8

9. Summary of Demarcation Altitudes 9

10. TYPICAL ARGUMENTS FOR AND AGAINST HAVING A DELIMITATION 10

11. Typical Arguments Against Having a Delimitation 11 The United Nations General Assembly Outer Space Treaty does not specify a starting point for space. There have not yet been adverse effects of not having one There is fear of preemptively creating an arbitrarily definition which could later hinder the use of a new technology. Imprecision in definitions

12. Typical Arguments For a Delimitation 12 Passage into Foreign Air Space The BRAUN satellite in 1988 and the U.S. Space Shuttle flew under 110 km altitude during landing (Benko 2013). In 2012 South Korea threatened to shoot down a North Korean satellite if it entered South Korea’s air space. Sohae Satellite Launching Station Location

13. Typical Arguments For a Delimitation 13 Innocent passage A term that refers to maritime concept that grants a foreign nation access to territorial waters when the vessel is peaceful. What if a nation claims non-innocent passage? (Ito 2011)

14. Emerging Arguments for Considering Delimitation Increasing international participation 14

15. Increasing Sub-Orbital Traffic 15

16. Summary Arguments against delimitation follow the line of reasoning that a lack of definition has not hurt space developments, and therefore no standardized definition is necessary. Arguments for delimitation are related to international disputes regarding crossing perceived airspace There are emerging arguments for delimitation that must be examined carefully – Increasing international participation in space activities – Increasing sub-orbital traffic Do we need to revisit the question more carefully? 16