Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

R4 문정락 / IC prof. 김진배 Lancet Haematol 2015;2: e150–59.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "R4 문정락 / IC prof. 김진배 Lancet Haematol 2015;2: e150–59."— Presentation transcript:

1 R4 문정락 / IC prof. 김진배 Lancet Haematol 2015;2: e150–59

2 Introduction NOACs (Non-vitamin K-antagonist oral anticoagulants, including dabigatran and rivaroxaban)  alternative to vitamin K antagonists for the prevention of arterial thromboembolism in patients with non- valvular A-fib. Subgroup analyses of the RE-LY and ROCKET-AF randomised trials have showed that patients switching from a vitamin K antagonist to NOAC had similar benefits as those starting a NOAC without previous VKA treatment. Little information exists about the risk of bleeding and arterial thromboembolism of switching from a VKA to NOAC.

3 Introduction We aimed to examine the risk of bleeding between switchers & non- switchers in those needing anticoagulation for non-valvular atrial fibrillation in real-world conditions. Also assessed the risk of arterial thromboembolism (ischaemic stroke or systemic embolism and MI) and composite events (including hemorrhage, ischemic stroke and MI)

4 Methods Study design and participants Nationwide, retrospective, matched-cohort study in France using information from a comprehensive French national health-insurance database [SNIIRAM] First prescription of a vitamin K antagonist for non-valvular atrial fibrillation between Jan 1, 2011, and Nov 30, 2012. Age ≥18 years Exclusion : who had switched from one type of vitamin K antagonist to another : dementia : surgery for valvular heart disease, recent cancer, dialysis for kidney failure, current or recent gastroduodenal ulceration, hepatic impairment or liver disease, and any lesion or condition with a substantial risk of severe bleeding such as anemia.

5 Methods Switchers - from a vitamin K antagonist to a NOAC, randomly selected up to two non-switchers (1:2) matched on basis of eight variables Age, sex, history of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, ischemic heart disease, vitamin K antagonist type, date of vitamin K-antagonist initiation, duration of vitamin K-antagonist use before the index, and INR number

6 Methods Outcomes The primary endpoint  bleeding events ICD-10 codes for intracranial haemorrhage Gastrointestinal hemorrhage or others Secondary endpoint  ischemic stroke or systemic embolism,first or recurrent myocardial infarction and variables.

7 Results

8

9

10 Bleeding risk

11 Risk of arterial embolism

12 Risk of composite events

13 Conclusion In our large, observational, post-marketing study, we noted no evidence of increased risk of severe bleeding, ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, first or recurrent myocardial infarction, or composite events in individuals who switched from a vitamin K antagonist to a NOAC compared with those who were maintained on a K antagonist.


Download ppt "R4 문정락 / IC prof. 김진배 Lancet Haematol 2015;2: e150–59."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google