Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

David E. Schneider, Ph.D. President, Michigan Association of Higher Education/MEA-NEA Professor of Communication at Saginaw Valley State University Salaries.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "David E. Schneider, Ph.D. President, Michigan Association of Higher Education/MEA-NEA Professor of Communication at Saginaw Valley State University Salaries."— Presentation transcript:

1 David E. Schneider, Ph.D. President, Michigan Association of Higher Education/MEA-NEA Professor of Communication at Saginaw Valley State University Salaries and Living Wages in Tough Times: What is Possible Today? Presented at the 37 th Annual Conference: National Center for the Study of Collective Bargaining in Higher Education and the Professions April 13, 2010 Hunter College, CUNY New York, New York

2 State of Michigan Legislative Initiatives in 2010 Senate appropriations committee pushing a 3.5% cut to all state universities and public community colleges Senate Republican plan seeks a 5% salary reduction and mandatory 20% health care premium share. House plans to increase multiplier from 1.5 to 1.6 for those in state retirement system; those eligible and declined lost dental and vision in retirement. Source:David Michelson, Ed.D. MEA Lobbyist

3 Saginaw Valley State University General Fund Revenue by Source FY2000FY2010 50% 46% 4% 28% 70% 2% State Appropriations Tuition & Fees Other FY1990 62% 35% 3% Source: Dr. Eric Gilbertson, President, Saginaw Valley State University

4 Schoolcraft Community College Faculty Contract 2009-2012 Salary --0% Salary Increases (full-time) --Step Increases Continue 3.64-7% --Part-Time Faculty Pay Increases 2.9%-14.33% Source:Colleen Pilgrim, Ph.D. Negotiator, Schoolcraft Faculty Association

5 Schoolcraft Community College Faculty Contract 2009-2012 Health Care --All health care options remain the same. All coverage levels remain the same (co-pays). Eliminated $900 faculty share of premium (1.13% salary) --Premiums fully paid in years 2 and 3 --Opt-out cash stipend increases from 3k to 5k Source:Colleen Pilgrim, Ph.D. Negotiator Schoolcraft Faculty Association

6 Oakland Community College Faculty Contract 2009-2011 --0% Salary Increases --Step Increases Continue (4-13%) --Anticipate Millage Campaign Fall 2010 Source:Nick Valenti, Chief Bargainer and President Oakland Community College Faculty Association

7 Oakland Community College Faculty Contract 2009-2011 --Health provider choices remain the same --No changes in coverage or co-pays --Faculty continue to pay 10% of premium for plan of choice Source:Nick Valenti, Chief Bargainer and President Oakland Community College Faculty Association

8 From Washington D.C. Health Care Reform Reconciliation Increased Pell Grand Funding Included $2 billion to Community Colleges Source:Mark Smith, NEA Higher Education Policy Analyst Nancy O’Brien, NEA Higher Education Lobbyist

9 Obama Agenda  Seeks to increase access  Will demand accountability (retention?)

10 Actual and projected numbers for high school graduates, total and by control of school: Selected years, 1993-94 through 2018-19 Source: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/projections/projections2018/sec3b.asp increased 27 percent between 1993-94 and 2005-06, a period of 12 years; and is projected to increase an additional 9 percent between 2005-06 and 2018-19, a period of 13 years

11 Actual and projected percentage changes in public high school graduates, by region and state: Selected years, 2000-01 through 2018-19 Projected Region and state Actual 2000-01 to 2005-06 2005-06 to 2012-13 2012-13 to 2018-19 2005-06 to 2018-19 Northeast13.8-1.3-2.1-3.3 Connecticut19.2-0.8-3.2-3.9 Maine2.2-13.00.3-12.7 Massachusetts12.6-4.0-2.3-6.2 New Hampshire13.8-6.0-2.2-8.1 New Jersey18.31.6-2.5-0.9 New York14.0-7.1-4.7-11.5 Pennsylvania11.78.12.110.4 Rhode Island17.5-8.7-13.5-21.0 Vermont-1.1-11.7-4.7-15.9 Source: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (CCD), “State Nonfiscal Survey of Public Elementary/Secondary Education,” 2001-02 and 2006-07; and State Public High School Graduates Model, 1980-81 through 2005-06. (This table was prepared December 2008.)

12 Actual and projected percentage changes in public high school graduates, by region and state: Selected years, 2000-01 through 2018-19 Projected Region and state Actual 2000-01 to 2005-06 2005-06 to 2012-13 2012-13 to 2018-19 2005-06 to 2018-19 Midwest6.1-1.73.41.7 Illinois14.64.12.66.8 Indiana3.16.68.015.1 Iowa-0.2-4.17.93.5 Kansas1.6-5.77.00.9 Michigan6.3-4.6-3.7-8.1 Minnesota4.1-4.95.2# Missouri7.9-2.97.64.6 Nebraska0.5-2.99.36.2 North Dakota-14.8-12.8-8.7-20.4 Ohio5.5-1.82.10.3 South Dakota-3.3-12.00.9-11.2 Wisconsin6.2-5.44.5-1.2 Source: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (CCD), “State Nonfiscal Survey of Public Elementary/Secondary Education,” 2001-02 and 2006-07; and State Public High School Graduates Model, 1980-81 through 2005-06. (This table was prepared December 2008.)

13 Actual and projected percentage changes in public high school graduates, by region and state: Selected years, 2000-01 through 2018-19 Projected Region and state Actual 2000-01 to 2005-06 2005-06 to 2012-13 2012-13 to 2018-19 2005-06 to 2018-19 South11.05.916.022.8 Alabama2.3#10.8 Arkansas6.2-1.612.811.0 Delaware10.04.112.517.1 District of Columbia12.2-16.0-4.0-19.4 Florida21.27.014.722.7 Georgia17.611.214.741.3 Kentucky4.03.29.713.2 Louisiana-13.2-5.5-3.4-8.6 Maryland12.8-4.9-2.1-6.9 Mississippi0.42.25.37.6 North Carolina21.26.924.633.2 Oklahoma-2.6-2.48.76.2 South Carolina16.5-3.410.76.9 Tennessee25.25.415.721.9 Texas11.713.023.840.0 Virginia5.37.29.717.5 West Virginia-9.1-0.83.42.6 Source: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (CCD), “State Nonfiscal Survey of Public Elementary/Secondary Education,” 2001-02 and 2006-07; and State Public High School Graduates Model, 1980-81 through 2005- 06. (This table was prepared December 2008.)

14 Actual and projected percentage changes in public high school graduates, by region and state: Selected years, 2000-01 through 2018-19 Projected Region and state Actual 2000-01 to 2005-06 2005-06 to 2012-13 2012-13 to 2018-19 2005-06 to 2018-19 West7.9 7.716.2 Alaska8.1-6.71.2-5.5 Arizona15.74.327.032.5 California9.010.40.511.0 Colorado13.27.221.129.8 Hawaii8.1-8.6-10.9-18.6 Idaho1.07.024.833.6 Montana-3.2-11.53.3-8.6 Nevada8.830.122.359.1 New Mexico-2.1-5.711.04.6 Oregon8.27.07.415.0 Utah-8.320.127.553.0 Washington9.30.25.75.9 Wyoming-9.0-10.216.04.2 Source: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (CCD), “State Nonfiscal Survey of Public Elementary/Secondary Education,” 2001-02 and 2006-07; and State Public High School Graduates Model, 1980-81 through 2005-06. (This table was prepared December 2008.)

15 Strategies Link salary increases to multiple growth contingencies; for example: “Members employed during the 2008-2009 fiscal year will receive a 1.0% base salary increase effective September 1, 2010.” “If student enrollment or student credit hours increase more than 3% for the Fall 2010 semester, faculty salaries will increase by an additional 1.5% retroactive to September 1, 2010.”

16 Consider Related Strategies  Add to a step system  Establish or increase minimum base salary  Stipends for specific duties (chair)  Enhance governance (curriculum management, budget advisory, personnel)  Professional development funds  Increase retirement contribution think


Download ppt "David E. Schneider, Ph.D. President, Michigan Association of Higher Education/MEA-NEA Professor of Communication at Saginaw Valley State University Salaries."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google