1. Last Lecture: The Peclet number, Pe, describes the competition between particle disordering because of Brownian diffusion and particle ordering under a shear stress. At high Pe (high shear strain rate), the particles are more ordered; shear thinning behaviour occurs and  decreases. van der Waals’ energy acting between a colloidal particle and a semi-  slab (or another particle) can be calculated by summing up the intermolecular energy between the constituent molecules. Macroscopic interactions can be related to the molecular level. The Hamaker constant, A, contains information about molecular density (  ) and the strength of intermolecular interactions (via the London constant, C): A =  2  2 C

2. PH3-SM (PHY3032) Soft Matter Lecture 8 Introductions to Polymers and Semi-Crystalline Polymers 29 November, 2010 See Jones’ Soft Condensed Matter, Chapt. 5 & 8

3. Definition of Polymers Polymers are giant molecules that consist of many repeating units. The molar mass (molecular weight) of a molecule, M, equals m o N, where m o is the the molar mass of a repeat unit and N is the number of units. Synthetic polymers never have the same value of N for all of its constituent molecules, but there is a Gaussian distribution of N. Polymers can be synthetic (such as poly(styrene) or poly(ethylene)) or natural (such as starch (repeat units of amylose) or proteins (repeat unit of amino acids)). Synthetic polymers are created through chemical reactions between smaller molecules, called “monomers”. The average N (or M) has a huge influence on mechanical properties of polymers.

4. Examples of Repeat Units

5. Molecular Weight Distributions In both cases: the number average molecular weight, M n = 10,000 M M Fraction of molecules

6. Molecular Weight of Polymers The molecular weight can be defined by a number average that depends on the number of molecules, n i, having a mass of M i : The polydispersity index describes the width of the distribution. In all cases: M W /M N > 1 The molecular weight can also be defined by a weight average that depends on the weight fraction, w i, of each type of molecule with a mass of M i : MWMW MNMN = Total mass divided by the total number of molecules

7. Types of Copolymer Molecules Within a single molecule, there can be “permanent order/disorder” in copolymers consisting of two or more different repeat units. Diblock Alternating Random or Statistical Can also be multi (>2) block.

8. Semi-Crystalline Polymers It is nearly impossible for a polymer to be 100% crystalline. Typically, the level of crystallinity is in the range from 20 to 60%. The chains surrounding polymer crystals can be in the glassy state, e.g. in poly(ethylene terephthalate) or PET The chains can be at a temperature above their glass transition temperature and be “rubbery”, e.g. in poly(ethylene) or PE The density of a polymer crystal is greater than the density of a polymer glass.

9. 15  m x 15  m Poly(ethylene) crystal 5  m x 5  m Polymer crystals can grow up to millimeters in size. Crystals of poly(ethylene oxide) Examples of Polymer Crystals

10. The unit cell is repeated in three directions in space. Polyethylene’s unit cell contains two ethylene repeat groups (C 2 H 4 ). Chains are aligned along the c-axis of the unit cell. Crystal Lattice Structure Polyethylene From G. Strobl, The Physics of Polymers (1997) Springer, p. 155

11. Structure at Different Length Scales Chains weave back and forth to create crystalline sheets, called lamella. A chain is not usually entirely contained within a lamella: portions of it can be in the amorphous phase or bridging two (or more) lamella. The lamella thickness, L, is typically about 10 nm. L From R.A.L. Jones, Soft Condensed Matter, O.U.P. (2004) p. 130 Lamella stacks

12. Structure at Different Length Scales Lamella usually form at a nucleation site and grow outwards. To fill all available space, the lamella branch or increase in number at greater distances from the centre. The resulting structures are called spherulites. Can be up to hundreds of micrometers in size. From G. Strobl, The Physics of Polymers (1997) Springer, p. 148

13. Hierarchical Structures of Chains in a Polymer Crystal Chains are aligned in the lamella in a direction that is perpendicular to the direction of the spherulite arm growth. Optical properties are anisotropic. From I.W. Hamley, Introduction to Soft Matter, p. 103

14. Crossed polarisers: No light can pass! Crossed Polarisers Block Light Transmission http://www.kth.se/fakulteter/TFY/kmf/lcd/lcd~1.htm Parallel polarisers: All light can pass An anisotropic polymer layer between crossed polarisers will “twist” the polarisation and allow some light to pass. The pattern is called a “Maltese cross”.

15. Observing Polymer Crystals Under Crossed Polarisers Light is only transmitted when anisotropic optical properties “twist” the polarisation of the light.

16. Temperature, T Free energy, G Free Energy of Phase Transitions Crystalline state Liquid (melt) state Tm()Tm() The state with the lowest free energy is the stable one. Below the equilibrium melting temperature, T m (  ), the crystalline state is stable. The thermodynamic driving force for crystallisation,  G, increases when cooling below the equilibrium T m (  ). GG Undercooling,  T, is defined as T m – T.

17. Thermodynamics of the Phase Transition Enthalpy of melting,  H m : heat is absorbed when going from the crystal to the melt. Enthalpy of crystallisation: heat is given off when a molten polymer forms a crystal. The melting temperature, T m, is always greater than the crystallisation temperature. The phase transitions are broad: they happen over a relatively wide range of temperatures. Heat flows in Heat flows out From G. Strobl, The Physics of Polymers (1997) Springer HmHm

18. Melt to crystal: Increase in Gibbs’ free energy from the creation of an interface between the crystal and amorphous region. When a single chain joins a crystal: At equilibrium: energy contributions are balanced and  G = 0. Melt to crystal (below T m ): Decrease in Gibbs’ free energy because of the enthalpy differences between the states (Enthalpy change per volume, H m ) x (volume) x (fractional undercooling) Thermodynamics of the Crystallisation/Melting Phase Transition L a2a2  f is an interfacial energy

19. Thermodynamics of the Crystallisation/Melting Phase Transition From  G = 0: Re-arranging and writing undercooling in terms of T m (L): Solving for T m (L): We see that a chain-folded crystal (short L) will melt at a lower temperature than an extended chain crystal (very large L).

20. a Crystal growth is from the edge of the lamella. The lamella grows a distance a when each chain is added. Lamellar growth direction Lamella thickness, L Lamellar Crystal Growth L From U.W. Gedde, Polymer Physics (1995) Chapman & Hall, p. 145 From U.W. Gedde, Polymer Physics (1995) Chapman & Hall, p. 161

21. Free energy GG TSTS The Entropy Barrier for a Polymer Chain to Join a Crystal Re-drawn from R.A.L. Jones, Soft Condensed Matter, O.U.P. (2004) p. 132 Melted state Crystalline state

22. Melt to crystal: the rate of crystal growth is equal to the product of the frequency   1 ) of “attempts” and the probability of going over the energy barrier (T  S): Crystal to melt: the rate of crystal melting is equal to the product of the frequency   1 ) of “attempts” and the probability of going over the energy barrier (T  S +  G): Net growth rate, u: the net rate of crystal growth, u, is equal to the difference between the two rates: The Rate of Crystal Growth, u

23. a Crystal growth is from the edge of the lamella. The lamella grows a distance a when each chain is added. Lamellar growth direction Lamella thickness, L Lamellar Crystal Growth L From U.W. Gedde, Polymer Physics (1995) Chapman & Hall, p. 145 From U.W. Gedde, Polymer Physics (1995) Chapman & Hall, p. 161

24. The velocity of crystal growth can be calculated from the product of the rate of growth (u, a frequency) and the distance added by each chain, a. Also, as  G/kT << 1, exp(-  G/kT)  G/kT: But from before -  G is a function of L: The entropy loss in straightening out a chain is proportional to the number of units of size a in a chain of length L: The Velocity of Crystal Growth, We see that the crystal growth velocity is a function of lamellar thickness, L. Finally, we find:

25. The Fastest Growing Lamellar Thickness, L* L dependence To find the maximum, set the differential = 0, and solve for L = L*. Solve for L = L*: L L*L*

26. m() - T Tm() - T L * (nm) T m (  )-T Lamellar Thickness is Inversely Related to Undercooling Original data from Barham et al. J. Mater. Sci. (1985) 20, p.1625 Jones, Soft Condensed Matter, p. 134 Experimental data for polyethylene.

27. Temperature Dependence of Crystal Growth Velocity The rate at which a chain attempts to join a growing crystal, , is expect to have the same temperature-dependence as the viscosity of the polymer melt: This temperature-dependence will contribute to the crystal growth velocity: Recall that  G depends on T and on L as: Finally, recall that the fastest-growing lamellar size, L = L*, also depends on temperature as: We see that  G(L*) becomes:

28. Temperature Dependence of Crystal Growth Velocity We can evaluate when L = L* and when  G =  G(L*): We finally find that: Recall that T 0 is approximately 50 K less than the glass transition temperature. Describes molecular slowing-down as T decreases towards T 0 Describes how the driving force for crystal growth is smaller with a lower amount of undercooling,  T.

29. Experimental Data on the Temperature Dependence of Crystal Growth Velocity T-T m  (K) T m  = crystal melting temperature From Ross and Frolen, Methods of Exptl. Phys., Vol. 16B (1985) p. 363.  (cm s -1 )

30. Data in Support of Crystallisation Rate Equation J.D. Hoffman et al., Journ. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand., vol. 79A, (1975), p. 671. V-F contribution: describes molecular slowing down with decreasing T Undercooling contribution: considers greater driving force for crystal growth with decreasing T  exp (B/(T-T 0 )) [cm s -1 ] 1/(T(T m (  )-T)) [10 -4 K -2 ]

31. Why Are Polymer Single Crystals (Extended Chains) Nearly Impossible to Achieve? Crystal with extended chains are favourable at very low levels of undercooling, as L* ~ 1/  T But as temperatures approach T m (  ), the crystal growth velocity is exceedingly slow! T-T m  (K)  (cm s -1 )

32. Factors that Inhibit Polymer Crystallisation 1.Slow chain motion (associated with high viscosity) creates a kinetic barrier 2.“Built-in” chain disorder, e.g. tacticity 3.Chain branching

33. Tacticity Builds in Disorder Isotactic: identical repeat units Syndiotactic: alternating repeat units Atactic: No pattern in repeat units Easiest to crystallise Usually do not crystallise R.A.L. Jones, Soft Condensed Matter (2004) O.U.P., p. 75

34. Linear Star-branched Branched Side-branched Polymer Architecture

35. Linear Poly(ethylene) Branched Poly(ethylene) Effects on Branching on Crystallinity Lamella are packed less tightly together when the chains are branched. There is a greater amorphous fraction and a lower overall density. From U.W. Gedde, Polymer Physics (1995) Chapman & Hall, p. 148

36. Determining Whether a Polymer Is (Semi)-Crystalline Raman Spectra “Fully” crystalline Amorphous Partially crystalline From G. Strobl, The Physics of Polymers (1997) Springer, p. 154

37. Summary Further Reading 1.Gert Strobl (1997) The Physics of Polymers, Springer 2.Richard A.L. Jones (2004) Soft Condensed Matter, Oxford University Press 3.Ulf W. Gedde (1995) Polymer Physics, Chapman & Hall Polymer crystals have a hierarchical structure: aligned chains, lamella, spherulites. Melting point is inversely related to the crystal’s lamellar thickness. Lamellar thickness is inversely related to the amount of undercooling. The maximum crystal growth rate usually occurs at temperatures between the melting temperature and the glass transition temperature. Tacticity and chain branching prevents or interrupts polymer crystal growth.

38. Problem Set 5 This table lists experimental values of the initial lamellar thickness for polyethylene crystallised at various temperatures. The equilibrium melting temperature was independently found to be 417.8 K. (a)Are the data broadly consistent with the predictions of theory? (b)Predict the melting temperature of crystals grown at a temperature of 400 K. Temperature, T (K) Lamellar thickness, L (nm) 358.958.9 368.959.9 385.7512.0 396.1514.1 397.5516.1 399.1515.9 400.8517.3 401.6518.2 403.0517.9 404.1520.1 405.5522.2