Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Mineral resources availability & recycling limits : A constraint for ambitious & sustainable energy scenarios Les Houches March 9th, 2016 Philippe Bihouix.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Mineral resources availability & recycling limits : A constraint for ambitious & sustainable energy scenarios Les Houches March 9th, 2016 Philippe Bihouix."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Mineral resources availability & recycling limits : A constraint for ambitious & sustainable energy scenarios Les Houches March 9th, 2016 Philippe Bihouix

2 2 Agenda What means a sustainable scenario? Interaction between energy and resources Recycling limits Takeaways for any (ambitious) deployment scenario

3 3 Agenda What means a sustainable scenario? Interaction between energy and resources Recycling limits Takeaways for any (ambitious) deployment scenario

4 4 What means a ‘sustainable’ energy scenario ? We can achieve, sufficiently rapidly, a ‘climate friendly’ energy mix We should (try to) avoid that this new mix has other bad environmental consequences e.g. pollution, biodiversity loss We can maintain this mix / system for a ‘certain’ duration ‘Long term’ : One or two generations, 21st century, more ?

5 5 Main ‘mistakes’ of current studies Several studies conclude that there is no constraint on resources Wind Water Sun (Stanford) Future of Solar energy (MIT)… However they have (generally) strong methodological limits… … on materials considered : e.g. lithium only, not cobalt, for batteries … on scope : devices or devices + subsystems + grids need for other ‘technical macrosystems’ (metal / chemical industries) other markets demand … on geological production capabilities, vs. costs and energy Let’s assume ‘a first deployment’ is feasible : we must then maintain it Additional new resources, and/or Partial / total recyclability of installed systems

6 6 Agenda What means a sustainable scenario? Interaction between energy and resources Recycling limits Takeaways for any (ambitious) deployment scenario

7 7 Which risk on the availability in the mid term ? Visibility on reserves Concentration of production Demand’s growth Substitution Recycling rate Economical impact (Macro / Micro) Risk on supply chain +- Which impact ? Deployment of innovations Resources : How critical / close may be the problem ?

8 8 Mineral resources : our playing field (*) Parts per million Sources : BRGM, USGS 2007 Reserves base in ktons (log scale) Abundance in ppm (*) (log scale) 1 00010 000100 0001 000 000 Virtually infinite 0.1%1%10%100% ~46% ~27% ~8% ~5% ~0.4% ~0.1% 12 abundant elements = 99,23% of earth’s crust weight Rare elements Very rare elements Rare earths elements (REE) Platinum Group Metals (PGM)

9 9 Reserves or resources : no geological limit Non identified potential Reserves : Identified and technically exploitable at current price Reserves base Demonstrated resources, not (yet) exploitable at current price Inferred reserves Economical dimension « Ultimate resources » Geological potential, identified but not yet explored Geological dimension Technical dimension

10 10 By the way, not so easy to assess reserves… 123456789101112131415161718 1H1H 2 He 3 Li 4 Be 5B5B 6C6C 7N7N 8O8O 9F9F 10 Ne 11 Na 12 Mg 13 Al 14 Si 15 P 16 S 17 Cl 18 Ar 19 K 20 Ca 21 Sc 22 Ti 23 V 24 Cr 25 Mn 26 Fe 27 Co 28 Ni 29 Cu 30 Zn 31 Ga 32 Ge 33 As 34 Se 35 Br 36 Kr 37 Rb 38 Sr 39 Y 40 Zr 41 Nb 42 Mo 44 Ru 45 Rh 46 Pd 47 Ag 48 Cd 49 In 50 Sn 51 Sb 52 Te 53 I 54 Xe 55 Cs 56 Ba * 72 Hf 73 Ta 74 W 75 Re 76 Os 77 Ir 78 Pt 79 Au 80 Hg 81 Tl 82 Pb 83 Bi ** *Lanthanides 57 La 58 Ce 59 Pr 60 Nd 62 Sm 63 Eu 64 Gd 65 Tb 66 Dy 67 Ho 68 Er 69 Tm 70 Yb 71 Lu **Actinides 90 Th 92 U 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Group   Period REE Big metals Subproducts of big metals Small metals – own production Subproducts of big or small metals Small metals – own production or subproducts of big metals Non exploited, non metals Platinum Group Metals Rare Earths

11 11 Interaction between energy and metals Less and less concentrated minerals Extraction of materials requiring more energy Less and less accessible energy Energy production requiring more materials

12 12 123456789101112131415161718 1H1H 2 He 3 Li 4 Be 5B5B 6C6C 7N7N 8O8O 9F9F 10 Ne 11 Na 12 Mg 13 Al 14 Si 15 P 16 S 17 Cl 18 Ar 19 K 20 Ca 21 Sc 22 Ti 23 V 24 Cr 25 Mn 26 Fe 27 Co 28 Ni 29 Cu 30 Zn 31 Ga 32 Ge 33 As 34 Se 35 Br 36 Kr 37 Rb 38 Sr 39 Y 40 Zr 41 Nb 42 Mo 44 Ru 45 Rh 46 Pd 47 Ag 48 Cd 49 In 50 Sn 51 Sb 52 Te 53 I 54 Xe 55 Cs 56 Ba * 72 Hf 73 Ta 74 W 75 Re 76 Os 77 Ir 78 Pt 79 Au 80 Hg 81 Tl 82 Pb 83 Bi ** *Lanthanides (Terres rares) 57 La 58 Ce 59 Pr 60 Nd 62 Sm 63 Eu 64 Gd 65 Tb 66 Dy 67 Ho 68 Er 69 Tm 70 Yb 71 Lu **Actinides 90 Th 92 U 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Group   Period Some metals required by “new energies”

13 13 Sources : USGS Note * : Titane concentrates (ilménite / ruménite) Million tons World consumption : industrial metals World production1900 – 2014e Million tons Aluminium Copper Zinc Titanium* Lead Nickel

14 14 Sources : USGS World consumption : specialty metals Indium production 3 Li 27 Co 31 Ga 44 Ru 49 In 52 Te 73 Ta 60 Nd 63 Eu 65 Tb 66 Dy Flat screens… Batteries… LED… Offshore wind, hybrid cars… Micro capacitors… Wifi… Compact fluorescent lamps… Flash memories, solar PV… 57 La Cobalt production Hard disks… On 15 years : + 9% / year 32 Ge on 15 years : + 7% / year

15 15 Agenda What means a sustainable scenario? Interaction between energy and resources Recycling limits Takeaways for any (ambitious) deployment scenario

16 16 For metals, we talk about flows, but also stocks Croesus, King of Lydia (from 561 to 547 BC) Coin in Gold of Pactolus

17 17 Limits of recycling #1… thermodynamics The disappeared job of tin-plater

18 18 99% would be already great 123456789101112131415161718 1H1H 2 He 3 Li 4 Be 5B5B 6C6C 7N7N 8O8O 9F9F 10 Ne 11 Na 12 Mg 13 Al 14 Si 15 P 16 S 17 Cl 18 Ar 19 K 20 Ca 21 Sc 22 Ti 23 V 24 Cr 25 Mn 26 Fe 27 Co 28 Ni 29 Cu 30 Zn 31 Ga 32 Ge 33 As 34 Se 35 Br 36 Kr 37 Rb 38 Sr 39 Y 40 Zr 41 Nb 42 Mo 44 Ru 45 Rh 46 Pd 47 Ag 48 Cd 49 In 50 Sn 51 Sb 52 Te 53 I 54 Xe 55 Cs 56 Ba * 72 Hf 73 Ta 74 W 75 Re 76 Os 77 Ir 78 Pt 79 Au 80 Hg 81 Tl 82 Pb 83 Bi ** *Lanthanides (Terres rares) 57 La 58 Ce 59 Pr 60 Nd 62 Sm 63 Eu 64 Gd 65 Tb 66 Dy 67 Ho 68 Er 69 Tm 70 Yb 71 Lu **Actinides 90 Th 92 U 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Groupe   Période Source : UNEP / Recycling rates of metals 2011 Recycling rate of metals < 1%1 – 10%10 – 25%25 – 50%> 50%

19 19 Limits of recycling #2… the dissipative usages Agriculture Cosmetics, Health Fireworks, weapons Paper InksPaints & Dyes

20 20 Limits of recycling #3… alloys, purity and « downcycling »

21 21 The « vertuous circle » of recycling Dissipative usages Mechanical loss, landfill Recycling with downcycling Recycling without downcycling

22 22 « Green growth » is accelerating these 2 issues Looking for a « clean car » « High tech struggle » against CO2 emissions Smart grids

23 23 And this is only the start… Nanotechnologies… and dissipative usages Hyperconnectivity, machines vs. humans, “electronisation” Technical obsolescence by research of performance IoT, robots, drones, big data…

24 24 Agenda What means a sustainable scenario? Interaction between energy and resources Recycling limits Takeaways for any (ambitious) deployment scenario

25 25 The « green growth » will NOT make it The gap is too big : We must work on demand, not just offer Engineers will not make miracles There is no « exit by the top »… High-tech is worsening the picture There is no Moore’s laws in energy. Electron ≠ Byte We need innovation and smart ideas : but not the ones we have had up to now We must bet on LOW TECH, not HIGH TECH

26 26 First, work on demand’s side… Cars Lighter vehicles, speed limit reduction Biking Buildings Better insulation Lower heating – No air conditioning Less m2 per person Energy intensive industries Ban disposable objects Reusable packaging – local exchanges & less cars, less buildings… Internet ?

27 27 Then, think about material usage & recyclability Devices should be: - Repairable - Modular - Reusable - Easy to dismantle - … Choices should based on : - Robustness - Simplicity - Single material based - Avoiding rare metals (if possible) - Avoiding electronics (as much as possible) - …

28 28 What does it mean for energy scenarios ? We have to keep in mind that our (at least current) industrial system cannot build solar panels from solar panels, wind turbines from wind turbines, etc. ‘100% renewable’ seems anyway difficult What about each technology ? Solar thermal > Solar PV Small is (seems) beautiful Performance requests kill us

29 29 Balance performance and resources’ consumption ? + vs. - High tech, Worldwide technologies - Production of subsystems and spare parts - Resources - Adaptation of transportation networks - Logistic bases - Access roads -… ?


Download ppt "1 Mineral resources availability & recycling limits : A constraint for ambitious & sustainable energy scenarios Les Houches March 9th, 2016 Philippe Bihouix."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google