1. HDNSP – SSN team, May 2010

2. SPA Motivation and background  Need to build empirical evidence for the SN case  Multiple efforts; databases of programs For protection and promotion/WB web: www.worldbank.org/spwww.worldbank.org/sp Program level (WB supported); Database of public spending on Social policy (70+ countries) UNDP Poverty Center: www.undp-povertycentre.orgwww.undp-povertycentre.org Chronic poverty research center (ver. 4) www.chronicpoverty.org/publications/details/social-assistance-in-developing-countries-database-version-4-0  These sources provide program-level information Programs are presented regardless of size Different methodologies (not comparable) Impact on beneficiaries, but not on national level outcomes Do not usually assess coverage Do not look at systems 2

3. SPA Objective  Provide nation-wide assessment focusing on he social protection system and its elements  the incidence of spending (coverage, amounts)  and impact  using official representative household survey data, processed into a comparable and harmonized datasets.  Benchmark safety protection programs across countries and across time.  Provide open and easy to access data for policymakers, civil society, World Bank staff and other stakeholders.  Initiate the dialogue with statistical offices for improving household data collection on social protection programs. 3

4. Is SPA unique?  There is no other source of similar indicators for the developing world With the same coverage Archived and accessible Focused on cutting edge techniques to assess program performance (ADePT tool)  For richer countries Luxembourg Income Study projects offers similar type of capabilities LIS hosts data from 200+ surveys from 36 countries, for some covering 1970-2008 (www.lisproject.org/techdoc.htm)www.lisproject.org/techdoc.htm Poverty lines use relative poverty to allow comparisons (% of median) Detailed list of social transfers and taxes Facility to conduct analysis, produce tables or download key figures Network of researchers using harmonized data: over 500 papers 4

5. What is ADePT?  Software platform for Automated Economic Analysis  Free, stand-alone program available to everybody  Accepts individual- and household-level data in Stata and SPSS format. Uses Stata numerical engine for computations.  Minimal data preparation required from the users  Extensive diagnostics of possible problems with the data  ADePT is a tool for simulations and sensitivity analysis  Intuitive user-friendly interface  Tested on 100’s of datasets from more than 50 countries ADePT Poverty: Released – June 2007 ADePT Labor: Released – November 2007 ADePT Gender: Released – November 2008 ADePT Social Protection: Released – June 2009 ADePT Education: Released – September 2009 ADePT Health: Released – December 2009 ADePT Inequality: Planned Release – Spring 2010 ADePT Targeting:Planned Release – Summer 2010 ADePT MAPS: Released – November 2008 ….. 5 Website: www.worldbank.org/adept

6. ADePT: From data to report

7. SPA in LAC 7  Most recent household survey data available at CEDLAS (Centro de Estudios Distributivos Laborales y Sociales) with information on household income and social protection programs  Argentina 2006  Bolivia 2006  Brazil 2006  Chile 2006  Colombia 2003  Costa Rica 2008  Rep Dominicana 2007  Ecuador 2008  El Salvador 2005 (2007)  Guatemala 2006  Honduras 2007  Jamaica 2006  Mexico 2008  Nicaragua 2005  Panama 2008  Paraguay 2007  Peru 2008  Suriname 1999  Uruguay 2008  Venezuela 2006  More to come

8. SPA in ECA 8  Most recent household survey data available at ECA targeting data base and ECAPOV) with information on household income and social protection programs  Armenia 2008  Azerbaijan 2007  Belarus 2008  Bosnia 2007  Bulgaria 2007  Georgia 2007  Hungary 2004  Kasakhstan 2007  Kosovo 2006  Kyrgyzstan 2006  Latvia 2008  Lithuania 2004  Macedonia 2005  Poland 2005  Romania 2008  Serbia 2007  Ukraine 2006  More to come

9. SPA in AFR, SAS, MENA and EAP 9  Most recent household survey data available collected from AFR, MENA, EAP and SAS with information on household income and social protection programs  AFR  Kenya 2005  Mauritius 2005  More to come  SAS  Bangladesh 2002  Pakistan 2005  More to come  MENA  Egypt 2008  Jordan 2003  Morocco 2001  Yemen 2005  West Bank 2007  More to come  EAP  Vietnam 2002  More to come

10. SPA Impact of SP on inequality 10

11. SPA Impact on inequality (SI vs SA) 11

12. SPA Cross country analysis 12

13. SPA standard output (ADePT SP) 13  Sample and population size of survey data used  Average transfer values by program (and all combined)  Coverage (% of population in beneficiary households)  Distribution of benefits (% accruing to each decile)  Targeting accuracy (exclusion and inclusion errors)  Relative incidence  Generosity (% of income covered by program)  Impacts on poverty and inequality (by program and all combined)  Undercoverage, leakage and targeting differential  Overlap across programs  Coady-Grosh-Hoddinott indicator  Cost-benefit ratios

14. SPA: Discovering gaps 14

15. SPA: Sorting out definitions 15

16. SPA benchmarking SI/SA 16

17. Uses of SPA  Social protection system of a country/region at a glance  In terms of overall coverage of the population/poor  By its elements/ overlaps/ gaps  Benchmarking whole systems and programs  In terms of coverage /incidence  In terms of impact on poverty/inequality  In terms of cost –benefit ratios  Identifying data gaps  In terms of programs/countries 17

18. SPA Next steps 18  Process of review with regional teams: expanding coverage of countries and time periods!!!  Dialogue / partnership with LIS to extend the coverage to high-income countries  Cross-validation with administrative data  Add simulations capability to mimic program rules (selective based on country data) (?) to compare effect of the crisis with and without SP  …..

19. SPA Welcoming cooperation  If we agree on the need to build a joint empirical basis for SP advocacy we can consider several options: Joint data platform Sharing and validating results Target specific groups (children, disabled) in the set of indicators Jointly producing and collecting data Joint use/development of software platform ADEPT surveys: it is a tool adoptable to any survey and can be customized It can greatly harmonize and streamline production of a rich set of indicators based on available surveys It informs collection of new data (obtain rich set of results by including 3-5 new questions into the standard household surveys) 19

20. Data is a public good We look forward to practical ideas for cooperation Thank you! 20