Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

New Castle Center for Delaware Hospice, Inc Zachary Klixbull Penn State University – Architectural Engineering Mechanical Option Advisor: Professor Bahnfleth.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "New Castle Center for Delaware Hospice, Inc Zachary Klixbull Penn State University – Architectural Engineering Mechanical Option Advisor: Professor Bahnfleth."— Presentation transcript:

1 New Castle Center for Delaware Hospice, Inc Zachary Klixbull Penn State University – Architectural Engineering Mechanical Option Advisor: Professor Bahnfleth

2 Presentation Outline Building Overview Existing conditions System Evaluation Proposed Redesign Mechanical Depth Electrical Breadth Conclusion New Castle Center for Delaware Hospice, Inc Zachary Klixbull Penn State University – Architectural Engineering Mechanical Option Advisor: Professor Bahnfleth Building Statistics Building Name: DE Hospice – New Castle Center Location and site: New Castle, DE Building Owner: Delaware Hospice Occupancy type: Medical Size: 65,000 SF Number of stories: Two-story Delivery method: GMP, CM at risk 2

3 Presentation Outline Building Overview Existing conditions System Evaluation Proposed Redesign Mechanical Depth Electrical Breadth Conclusion Project Team Owner: Delaware Hospice Architect: Reese, Lower, Patrick & Scoot Construction Manager: Skanska Structural Engineer: Macitosh Engineer Mech./Elec./Plumbing Engineer: Reese Engineering Food Service Consultant: JEM Associates Interior Designer: Reese, Lower, Patrick & Scoot Landscape Architect: Rummler Associates Civil Engineer:Landmark Engineering Building Statistics Dates of Construction Construction Begins: August, 2011 Start Exterior Façade: January, 2012 Construction Complete: September, 2012 3

4 Presentation Outline Building Overview Existing conditions System Evaluation Proposed Redesign Mechanical Depth Electrical Breadth Conclusion Zones 4

5 Presentation Outline Building Overview Existing conditions System Evaluation Proposed Redesign Mechanical Depth Electrical Breadth Conclusion Zones 5

6 6

7 Presentation Outline Building Overview Existing conditions System Evaluation Proposed Redesign Mechanical Depth Electrical Breadth Conclusion Existing Conditions Annual Energy Consumption Load Electricity (kWh)Natural Gas (kWh) Percent of Total Energy (%) Heating 21,765 1.5% Cooling 158,997 11.2% Supply Fans 448,844 31.7% Pumps 257,923 18.2% Lighting 438,502 31% Receptacle 88,126 6.2% 7

8 Presentation Outline Building Overview Existing conditions System Evaluation Proposed Redesign Mechanical Depth Electrical Breadth Conclusion Systems Evalvation 8

9 Hybrid Geothermal System 9

10 Presentation Outline Building Overview Existing conditions System Evaluation Proposed Redesign Mechanical Depth Electrical Breadth Conclusion Hybrid Geothermal System 10

11 Hybrid Geothermal System JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUNE JULY AUG. SEPT OCT NOV. DEC. Red = EWT HP Blue =GHXPurple = Supplement 11

12 Hybrid Geothermal System JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUNE JULY AUG. SEPT OCT NOV. DEC. Red = EWT HP Blue =GHXPurple = Supplement 12

13 Hybrid Geothermal System Presentation Outline Building Overview Existing conditions System Evaluation Proposed Redesign Mechanical Depth Electrical Breadth Conclusion JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUNE JULY AUG. SEPT OCT NOV. DEC. 175 F 144 F 113 F 82 F 54 F 20 F 97 F Red = EWT HP Blue =GHXPurple = Supplement 13

14 Hybrid Geothermal System 14

15 Hybrid Geothermal System Presentation Outline Building Overview Existing conditions System Evaluation Proposed Redesign Mechanical Depth Electrical Breadth Conclusion 15

16 Electrical Breadth Presentation Outline Building Overview Existing conditions System Evaluation Proposed Redesign Mechanical Depth Electrical Breadth Conclusion Electrical 3360 sq. ft. 2175 Watts @ 1587 sq. ft. $191,475 investment, $134,028 after rebates $4,059 annual savings 33.04 years pay back period 16

17 Presentation Outline Building Overview Existing conditions System Evaluation Proposed Redesign Mechanical Depth Electrical Breadth Conclusion In conclusion on my research of ground source heat pump or hybrid geothermal for DE Hospice, I find that hybrid geothermal is a great choice for a more green design with a lower first cost. If ground source heat pumps can be afforded it would be better to choice them in the long run. With only saving $53,000 a year, it would only take just over six year of annual savings to make up for the $319,180 in equipment cost. 17

18 Appendix Scott Hackel. “Hybrid Ground-Source Heat Pump Installations: Experiences, Improvements and Tools.” Energy Center of Wisconsin. June 30, 2011 “2007 ASHRAE Handbook: HVAC Applications.” 2007. American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air-Conditioning Engineers Carol Marriott. “3 Simple Approaches to Energy Efficiency: Optimal Air, Energy Recovery, Geothermal” ASHRAE Journal July (2006): pp. 44-50 Al Barfield. “Hybrid Geothermal Heat Pump for Beachfront Hotel” ASHRAE Journal Sept. (2006): pp. 49-55 Stephen P. Kavanaugh and Kevin Rafferty. “Ground-Source Heat Pumps: Design of Geothermal System for Commercial and Institutional Buildings” 1997 American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air-Conditioning Engineers Reference 18

19 Questions? 19


Download ppt "New Castle Center for Delaware Hospice, Inc Zachary Klixbull Penn State University – Architectural Engineering Mechanical Option Advisor: Professor Bahnfleth."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google