1. Fall 2006 1 CS-EE 480 Lillevik 480f06-l2 University of Portland School of Engineering Senior Design Lecture 2 Expectations/Rumors Calendar/Evaluation Defined Projects

2. Fall 2006 2 CS-EE 480 Lillevik 480f06-l2 University of Portland School of Engineering Expectations Fair/honest evaluation/grading Clear communication of expectations Available/office hours/quick email Provide support during design process

3. Fall 2006 3 CS-EE 480 Lillevik 480f06-l2 University of Portland School of Engineering Rumors Class gets out early or cancelled, too much writing A lot of outside of class work, spring break is critical Do a MOSIS project, done early Conflict between instructor, advisor, industry rep Cross-dressing

4. Fall 2006 4 CS-EE 480 Lillevik 480f06-l2 University of Portland School of Engineering Time Management Hints? Calendar you share Don’t procrastinate Keep track of time spent Stick to calendar Create a routine Communicate Regular break, stay focused

5. Fall 2006 5 CS-EE 480 Lillevik 480f06-l2 University of Portland School of Engineering Prioritize Review how you’re doing

6. Fall 2006 6 CS-EE 480 Lillevik 480f06-l2 University of Portland School of Engineering Types of deliverables Project: demonstrated at Founders Day Documents: 2-per-semester Weeklies: due Friday at 5 PM to advisor, instructor, starting this week Program reviews: monthly Approval meetings: 3-per-semester Web site: updated regularly

7. Fall 2006 7 CS-EE 480 Lillevik 480f06-l2 University of Portland School of Engineering 1 45678 1112131415 1819202122 2526272829 MonTueWedThuFri Weekly Pre-approval Weekly FS 0.9 Weekly Picnic Pgm rev Projects Approved Adv/IR Assigned September 2006 CS-EE 480 University of Portland

8. Fall 2006 8 CS-EE 480 Lillevik 480f06-l2 University of Portland School of Engineering October 2006 CS-EE 480 University of Portland Pgm rev Weekly FS 1.0 Approv mtg Weekly Fall Break Starts Weekly Plan 0.9 MonTueWedThuFri 56 910111213 1617181920 2324252627 30 31 123 234 FS 0.95 to IR Fall Break Ends Weekly

9. Fall 2006 9 CS-EE 480 Lillevik 480f06-l2 University of Portland School of Engineering November 2006 CS-EE 480 University of Portland Pgm rev Weekly Plan 1.0 Approv mtg Funding Weekly Weekly, Optional Weekly MonTueWedThuFri 3 678910 1314151617 2021222324 272829301 Plan 0.95 to IR Thanksgiving DR info list

10. Fall 2006 10 CS-EE 480 Lillevik 480f06-l2 University of Portland School of Engineering December 2006 CS-EE 480 University of Portland Weekly Design rel Approv mtg MonTueWedThuFri 1 45678 1112131415 1819202122 2526272829 DR info to IR Peer reviews Finals Start Xmas Starts Finals End

11. Fall 2006 11 CS-EE 480 Lillevik 480f06-l2 University of Portland School of Engineering January 2007 CS-EE 480 University of Portland Pgm rev Weekly MonTueWedThuFri 45 89101112 1516171819 2223242526 2930 31 1 2 123 Xmas Ends Weekly Semester Begins

12. Fall 2006 12 CS-EE 480 Lillevik 480f06-l2 University of Portland School of Engineering February 2007 CS-EE 480 University of Portland Pgm rev Weekly TOP 0.9 Weekly TOP 1.0 Approv mtg Weekly MonTueWedThuFri 12 56789 1213141516 1920212223 26272812 TOP 0.95 to IR

13. Fall 2006 13 CS-EE 480 Lillevik 480f06-l2 University of Portland School of Engineering March 2007 CS-EE 480 University of Portland Pgm rev Weekly PR info list Weekly MonTueWedThuFri 56789 1213141516 1920212223 2627282930 Spring Break Starts Spring Break Ends

14. Fall 2006 14 CS-EE 480 Lillevik 480f06-l2 University of Portland School of Engineering April 2007 CS-EE 480 University of Portland Founders Day Final rpt 0.9 Weekly Proto rel Approv mtg Weekly, optional Weekly Final rpt 1.0 Approv mtg MonTueWedThuFri 56 910111213 1617181920 2324252627 301234 234 PR info to IR FD Rehearsal Final rpt 0.95 to IR Peer reviews Finals Start Post Mortem with Jr’s Easter Monday Finals End Senior luncheon Weekly

15. Fall 2006 15 CS-EE 480 Lillevik 480f06-l2 University of Portland School of Engineering Evaluation Rubric Criteria Max Points Definition 1. Schedule (60%) Evaluates the process component 1.1 Milestones15Did the student meet their schedule? Were there good reasons why they did not? 1.2 Documents15 Were the documents well written in terms of content, organization, style, and editing? 1.3 Program Reviews10 Did the program reviews provide up-to-date and accurate accomplishments, plans, and issues? 1.4 Team Skills10 How well did the student interact with their team, advisor, and industry rep? Did they contribute their fair share? Did they lead or follow? 1.5 Other10 Were weeklies submitted regularly and on time? Were meeting minutes accurate and timely? Did the web site contain all project information? Was it updated regularly? 2. Technical (40%) Evaluates the technical component 2.1 Depth20 What was the “degree of difficulty” or complexity of the contribution? Did they solve the hard or easy problems? 2.2 Breadth20What was the range or scope of technical contribution? TOTAL100

16. Fall 2006 16 CS-EE 480 Lillevik 480f06-l2 University of Portland School of Engineering Projects Defined? Who is on the team? What does it do? What technologies does it use?

17. Fall 2006 17 CS-EE 480 Lillevik 480f06-l2 University of Portland School of Engineering Pre-Approval (Sep. 8) Title of product Team members Description of product Technologies used (very important) Risks Other