Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Lunch Proposal Section 303 Team 8 Amelia Chappell, Susmita Das, Dustin Harris, Karen Ottoni, Neena Vasavan.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Lunch Proposal Section 303 Team 8 Amelia Chappell, Susmita Das, Dustin Harris, Karen Ottoni, Neena Vasavan."— Presentation transcript:

1 Lunch Proposal Section 303 Team 8 Amelia Chappell, Susmita Das, Dustin Harris, Karen Ottoni, Neena Vasavan

2 Research Objective The Question Are consumers interested and willing to pay for a lunch option from Blue Apron. If so, what attributes should be included in the offering? The Analysis Quantitative Tools: Conjoint analysis Chi square test Market sizing / simulated test market Qualitative: Social media listening 6 individual interviews Qualtrics Survey: 17 Questions 61 Responses 2

3 Key Findings – Qualitative Research Customer sentiment analysis showed generally positive association with Blue Apron. Interviews suggested some interest in Blue Apron lunches, but few spend much time preparing lunch. 3 If it takes more than 5 minutes I won’t do it, so I just need lunch to just throw in a Tupperware I take homemade lunches four times a week It would be more of a nuisance to make a lunch only meal Yeah, I’m always interested in new food in general

4 Survey Highlights (1 of 2) 87% of respondents agree that lunch is an important meal Most respondents make lunch 1 or more times per week Consumers care about their lunch, which we believe is important for them to be open to a Blue Apron lunch offering. They are already making their lunch, so this would not require a change in habit. 4

5 Survey Highlights (1 of 2) 92% of respondents spend 15 minutes or less preparing lunch 75% of consumers cited time as one reason why they sometimes don’t make lunch However, consumers don’t spend much time preparing lunch. Additionally, time is a key reason why consumers sometimes choose not to make lunch. 5

6 Key Findings – Conjoint Analysis Price and recipe type are the most important variables for consumers. 6 ***Winning Profiles*** Hot meal, 3 meals/week, 2 servings/meal, $6 per serving Salad, 3 meals/week, 2 servings/meal, $6 per serving ***Winning Profiles*** Hot meal, 3 meals/week, 2 servings/meal, $6 per serving Salad, 3 meals/week, 2 servings/meal, $6 per serving

7 Key Findings – Simulated Test Market This test was done to estimate potential revenue for a Blue Apron lunch offering. Based on the results of this test, we estimated annual revenue of $68.6 M with min. $26.5M from sensitivity testing. 7

8 Key Findings – Chi Square Analysis Chi-square Test of Independence – We performed this test to determine whether there is a relationship between time consumers take to prepare lunch and likelihood of purchase. Results indicate no relation as p-value > 0.05 8

9 Recommendation Launch a lunch option! Why? – Survey shows some interest in a Blue Apron lunch offering – Market sizing shows strong revenue potential What Kind? – Hot meal or salad, 3 meals/week, 2 servings/meal, $6 per serving Next Steps – Large scale survey – Cost analysis to ensure feasibility – Pilot test with current customer base 9

10 Questions? 10

11 Appendix 11

12 Survey – Demographic Highlights 12

13 Market Sizing – Key Assumptions 13 The awareness amongst the non-customers about lunch meals service is 0%. The calculations are done on the basis of weekly purchases. ACV = 100% 33% of the existing customers would make repeat purchases. The repeat and trial unit sales would be derived by making use of the following combination of attributes: 3 meals/week 2 servings/meal Repeat occasions = 10 (Out of 52 weeks in a year, customers would make repeat purchases on 10 weeks)


Download ppt "Lunch Proposal Section 303 Team 8 Amelia Chappell, Susmita Das, Dustin Harris, Karen Ottoni, Neena Vasavan."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google