1. GEOSS Architecture Implementation Pilot - AIP-2 Results - AIP-3 Initial concepts George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium GEO Task AR-09-01b Task POC GEO Combined Committees 14 September 2009

2. Operational Capability Operational Capability User Needs, Scenarios User Needs, Scenarios Design, Develop, Deploy Design, Develop, Deploy Architecture Implementation Pilot (AIP) Task AR-09-01b GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI) Task AR-09-01a support persistent implementation requirements SBA Tasks, UIC Elaboration of GEOSS Architecture

3. GEO Task AR-09-01b Architecture Implementation Pilot Develop and pilot new process and infrastructure components for the GCI and the broader GEOSS architecture Continuation of existing efforts and new activities solicited through AIP Calls for Participation (CFPs) and other means; –Including continuation of IP3 Slide 3

4. Acknowledgments AIP-2 Summary provides an overview of efforts of scores of GEOSS Members and Participating Organizations. Hundreds of individuals from those organizations have contributed to the development of AIP Our collective contributions are making it possible to create GEOSS.

5. Main achievements of AIP-2 Developed and demonstrated six SBA scenarios in close collaboration with other GEO Tasks. –Scenarios identified through UIC/ADC collaboration Established reusable process to implement SBA scenarios in Service oriented Architecture (SoA) for GEOSS –Defined 10 transverse use cases for SoA –With SIF, further advanced GEOSS Interoperability Arrangements Piloted augmentations to the GCI –identification of Engineering view Components –Contributed to increased in CSR registered resource –Promoted “persistent exemplar services” –Service testing facilities to test contributed components during the registration process and operations Slide 5

6. AIP Phase 2 Master Schedule

7. SBAs for AIP-2 Scenarios Disaster Management: –Editors: NASA, Spot Image, ERDAS, Northrop Grumman AQ & Health – Smoke Event: –Editors: EPA, Washington Univ St. Louis, NAS Biodiversity: Pika Distribution: –Editors: CNR Biodiversity: Arctic Food Chain: –Editors: CNR Biodiversity: Polar Ecosystems: –Editors: USGS, George Mason Univ Renewable Energy - Facility Planner: –Editors: Mines Paris

8. AIP-2 Disaster Management Scenario Dan Mandl and Stuart Frye, NASA; Didier Giacobbo, Spot Image Herve Caumont, ERDAS Ron Lowther, Northrop Grumman

9. Disaster Management Summary Demonstrated capability to find, access, display, and use data from Myanmar, Ike, and Hannah events replayed from 2008 using Geoportal to discover SIREN community of interest portal and related data providers registered in the GEOSS registry Activity involved data provider components and services and end user involvement from disaster management communities of interest Components and services remain ready to serve future needs, in particular, the Caribbean Flood Pilot GEO Task DI-09-02B

10. Theme-Based Flood Tasking and Product Generation From portal select desired theme(s) and area of interest Wizard picks appropriate workflow for desired result Wizard Mozambique Disaster Management Information System (DMIS) Workflows Estimated rainfall accumulation and flood prediction model Flood Model Selected workflow automatically activates needed assets and models Baseline water level, flood waters and predicted flooding

11. AIP-2 Renewable Energy Scenario AIP Renewable Energy Working Group Lionel Menard – Mines ParisTech & Team

12. Real Business Use Case Scenario Investors and electricity producers willing to invest in solar plants need precise and thorough information to support decision-making. On their behalf, consulting companies perform feasibility studies in order to decide where to sit power plants and which technology to use ensuring a profitable return on investment. To reach that goal, consultants need an easy and unified access to data sets. Such data sets include meteorological, geographical and environmental parameters. Download KMZ file From user concern… …to on-line data and map delivery JSR-168 Portlet Client input/output selection: Area Of Interest (AOI) Output scale Optional layers Output result as a KMZ archive containing: Solar radiation layers (GeoTIFF) Additional geographical and/or environemental layers

13. AIP-2 Application to Air Quality & Health SBA Prepared by the GEOSS AIP-2 Air Quality & Health Working Group David McCabe EPA Rudy Husar, Erin Robinson, Washington Univ. St. Louis Frank Lindsay, NASA Stefan Falke, Northrop Grumman

14. Goals of AIP II for Air Quality Test and evaluate the GCI for AQ applications. Registering and retrieving AQ data through the Clearinghouse Connect AQ Applications to GCI Background Scenario: Use of a broad, common Pool of AQ observations to support a variety of decisions Data Needs Ambient Meteorology Emissions Models Satellite Decision Makers Policy maker assessing intercontinental transport AQ manager assessing an exceptional event Public planning activities today and tomorrow Air Quality Community Portal

15. Summary / Next Steps Find: CSW/RSS/ISO Bind: WMS/WCS Publish: ISO Metadata User Provider GEOSS Clearinghouse Summary 1.Three Standards suffice to accomplish Publish- Find-Bind 2.Basic flow of air quality through GCI has begun 3.Portals and Client Apps can now add value- adding services Next Steps 1.Consolidate Clearinghouse(s) so focus can be on value-adding services 2.Continue engaging GEO on User Requirements for the GCI

16. AIP-2 Climate Change and Ecosystems Stefano Nativi (CNR), Gary Geller (NASA/JPL), Chris Ray (Univ. Of Colorado), Falk Huettmann (University of Alaska ), Mattia Santoro (CNR), Siri Jodha Khalsa (Univ. of Colorado), Eamonn O’Tuama (GBIF), David Thomas (WMO)

17. CC IMPACT ON PIKA DISTRIBUTION distribution of pika and how it is changingThis scenario is driven primarily by scientific research on the distribution of pika and how it is changing. to investigate the interoperability process to determine valuable predictors for the impact of climate change on biodiversityGEOSS infrastructure perspective: to investigate the interoperability process to determine valuable predictors for the impact of climate change on biodiversity to model pika distributions and how they may change with climateUse observations of pika over the last 20 years, plus existing modeling demonstration systems, to model pika distributions and how they may change with climate Area of Interest The US Great Basin region (1x1 km) Scientific patrons Dr. Chris Ray (University of Colorado - CO USA)

18. CC IMPACT ON POLAR FOOD CHAIN maps of Arctic biodiversity, habitat and ecological service changesa summarized scenario runs with all relevant metricsThe scenario output will be as maps of Arctic biodiversity, habitat and ecological service changes, as well as a summarized scenario runs with all relevant metrics provided in a simple to comprehend table. The scenario models will allow to assess the amount and quality of Ecological Services provided by the ArcticThe scenario models will allow to assess the amount and quality of Ecological Services provided by the Arctic. The activities are intended to be linked with all relevant components of the IPY (International Polar Year). Area of Interest The Arctic (as defined as the 60 degree latitude circle) Scientific patrons Dr. Falk Huettmann EWHALE lab- Biology and Wildlife Dept., Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks

19. IP3 Client & Workflow engine IP3 Distributed Community Catalog/Mediator WCS - T Other Non-OGC Services GBIF OpenModeller Server Non-OGC Services WPS (IP3 ENM) CSW req resp req GEO Portal req WCS WFS req resp req resp req resp req resp req resp req resp Broker

20. POLAR ECOSYSTEMS – LANDSAT SCENARIO Doug Nebert, USGS; Yuqi Bai, GMU

21. POLAR ECOSYSTEMS - LANDSAT Doug Nebert, USGS; Yuqi Bai, GMU

22. Reusable Process for SBA to SOA Transverse Use Cases support Community Scenarios Scenarios: end user view of the value of GEOSS –Focused on topics of interest to a community –Occur in a geographic Area of Interest (AOI) –Steps in a scenario are Use Cases –Scenarios developed by Community WGs Use Cases: reusable service oriented architecture –Use cases for discovery, data access, etc –Utilize Interoperability Arrangements –Use Cases developed by Transverse Technology WGs

23. 4. Deployment Plan 4. Deployment Plan 1. SBA Scenarios 1. SBA Scenarios 2. Enterprise Models 2. Enterprise Models 3. Engineering Design 3. Engineering Design Use Cases Component Types Information Objects Optimize Specify SBA-to-SoA Process

24. AIP-2 Augmenting GCI GEOSS Clearinghouses GEO Web Portals GEOSS Common Infrastructure Components & Services Standards and Interoperability Best Practices Wiki User Requirements Registries Main GEO Web Site Registered Community Resources Community Portals Client Applications Client Tier Business Process Tier Community Catalogues Alert Servers Workflow Managemen t Processing Servers Access Tier GEONETCast Product Access Servers Sensor Web Servers Model Access Servers Test Facility Mediation Servers

25. GEOSS Interoperability Arrangements - From the GEOSS 10 Year Plan Reference Document - Interoperability through open interfaces –Interoperability specifications agreed to among contributing systems –Access to data and information through service interfaces Open standards and intellectual property rights –GEOSS adopting standards; agreed upon by consensus, preference to formal international standards –GEOSS will not require commercial or proprietary standards –Multiple software implementations compliant with the open standards should exist –Goal is that at least one of the implementations should be available to all implementers "royalty-free"

26. Engineering Components and Interoperability Arrangements

27. AIP-2 Deliverables (GEO Task AR-09-01b) Demonstrations –Demonstration of community Scenarios implemented through transverse Use Cases –Demonstrations to be recorded and made available via WWW Persistent Exemplars –Registered services (‘continuous operation’) with 99% availability (~7 hours down time a month); on a reliable network; plan for performance scaling –Nomination to operational task (AR-09-01a) Engineering Reports –Community Scenarios –Technology Reports –AIP-2 Summary Report

28. AIP-2 Demonstration Videos on-line http://www.ogcnetwork.net/pub/ogcnetwork/GEOSS/AIP2/index.html

29. AIP-2 Document Tree GEOSS 10 Year Plan GEOSS 10 Year Plan Reference Document AIP Architecture (CFP Annex B) Strategic & Tactical Guidance Documents AIP-2 Unified Modeling ER SBA/CoP AIP Scenarios AIP-2 SBA Scenario ERs AIP-2 Use Cases ER AIP-2 Transverse Technology ERs AIP-2 Summary GCI IOC Task Force Documents SIF Documents

30. Persistent Exemplar Services Criteria to be a persistent exemplar 1.Registered in Component and Service Registry (CSR) as “Continuously Operational” 2.Accessible through a GEOSS Interoperability Arrangement that is an international standard. 3.Level of Service: Available >99% of the time (~7 hours downtime/month); Adequate network bandwidth and hardware for performance 192 services met criteria 1 & 2 as of 13 July 2009, –Methods to assess criterion #3 to be developed

31. AIP-2 Conclusion All major activities are now complete Major Achievements –Six SBA Scenarios show use of GEOSS for communities of interest –Reusable process for applying Service Oriented Architecture to other SBAs –Augmentation of GCI: components, persistent exemplars, increase availability Presentation of results to GEO-VI Plenary and Exhibit

32. GEOSS Architecture Implementation Pilot, Phase 3 - AIP-3 Initial Concepts -

33. GEOSS AIP-3 Potential Topics GCI with AIP-2 Augmentations for Sustained Operations SBAs to be identified working with the UIC. Potential communities of practice include: –AIP-2 SBAs to be considered –New SBAs: Environmental Monitoring, Oceans and coastal zones, Hydrology and drought management; Humanitarian response to disaster Focus on data: global datasets; data quality; licenses and user management; information architecture –Observables for EO, including discussion of registries and ontologies. –Coordination with the User Requirements Registry regarding observables and other topics relevant to AIP-3. © 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. 33

34. AIP-3 Master Schedule – Draft – All dates are preliminary estimates Results in time for ministerial

35. References GEO –earthobservations.orgearthobservations.org GEO Architecture Implementation Pilot –www.ogcnetwork.net/AIpilotwww.ogcnetwork.net/AIpilot GEOSS registries and SIF –geossregistries.infogeossregistries.info George Percivall percivall@myogc.org