1. ISO/IEC JTC 1/SG 1 Study Group on Smart Cities Originally presented to JTC 1, October 2015, Beijing by Yuan Yuan, SG 1 Convenor Tangli Liu, SG 1 Secretary Presented to ANSI Network on Smart and Sustainable Cities. February 4, 2016 By George Percivall, CTO, Open Geospatial Consortium OGC liaison expert to JTC 1/SG 1

2. Background: SG 1 JTC 1 reconstitutes the Study Group on Smart Cities. (Resolutions 23, ISO/IEC JTC 1 N 12395, 2014-11-27) JTC 1 establishes a Study Group on Smart Cities. (Resolutions 3, ISO/IEC JTC 1 N 11894, 2013-11-12)

3. JTC 1/SG 1 Terms of Reference 1. Investigating the value and scope of a Smart Cities’ model, including a Smart City Reference Model from an ICT perspective, a domain knowledge model, and a data and service model; 2. Investigating the need for guidelines for smart city leaders and practitioners highlighting the roles and implications of ICT standards in their work; 3. Investigating the scope for guidance for city managers on the selection and use of performance and other ICT-related indicators, and the potential contribution of further ICT-related indicators to the work of ISO TC 268; 4. Investigating the need of guidance for city managers on the selection and use of performance and other ICT-related indicators; 5. Investigating the value of requirements for standardized risk assessment methodologies that underline the dependencies across organizations and sectors inherent to Smart Cities;

4. JTC 1/SG 1 Terms of Reference 6. Monitoring the development of AWI 19 944 (“Data and their flow across Devices and Cloud Services”) and identifying further smart city-specific related requirements if and when they arise; 7. Investigating ICT standardization requirements and techniques that contribute to enhancing individual control over personal data while recognizing the benefit to society of the sharing of pertinent personal data (such as in the fields of healthcare, security, economic and social indicators, etc.); 8. Investigating Smart Cities-specific requirements for ongoing work on Privacy Impact Assessments; 9. Liaison with relevant JTC 1 SCs, (S)WGs etc., e.g. SC 27, SC 38, JTC 1 WG 10, to help them take into account any specificity relating to smart cities in their standards development work; and 10.Liaison with other international standards bodies, in collaboration with the ISO/TMB/AG on Smart Cities, IEC/SEG 1, ITU-T/FG SSC, ISO/TC 268 etc. to identify gaps and ensure greater consistency between the standards being developed for Smart Cities. 11.Provide a report with recommendations and potentially other deliverables to the 2015 JTC 1 Plenary

5. P and O Members (81 Experts) Experts are from 14 countries: Australia (SA)Korea (KATS) Canada (SCC)Netherlands (NEN) China (SAC)Singapore (IDA) France (AFNOR)Sweden (SIS) Finland (SFS)UK (BSI) Germany (DIN)USA (ANSI) Italy (UNI)Japan (JISC)

6. Liaisons 1111 RepresentativeLiaison to Tangli LiuIEC/SEG 1 Ziqin Sang, Flavio CucchiettiITU-T/ SG 20 Francois Coallier, Biyu WANISO/TC 268/SC 1 Michael MulquinCEN/CENELEC/ETSI SSCC-CG TBDISO/TMB AG on Smart Cities Chuck AdamsISO/IEC JTC 1/SWG 5 RepresentativeLiaison from Wei SunIEC/SEG 1 Ziqin Sang, Flavio CucchiettiITU-T/ FG-SSC Endou IsaoTC 268/SC 1 Isao EndouISO/TC 268/SC 1 Michael MulquinCEN/CENELEC/ETSI SSCC-CG TBDISO/TMB SAG on Smart Cities Chris Body, Di Liping TC 211 George PercivallOGC

7. Editing Team 1111 RoleName EditorMichael Mulquin (UK) Co-EditorPeter Brown (UK) Co-EditorFrancois Coallier (CA) Co-EditorWeihua Zhang (CN) Co-EditorJun Seob Lee (KR) Co-Editor(new)George Percivall (OGC)

8. Retrospection of JTC 1/SG 1’s work 1st F2F meeting in Beijing, China, 2015.3.4-3.6 – agreed on the outline of the SG 1 Phase 2 Report – established the editing team on the SG 1 Report – agreed on the SG 1 Phase 2 Report Timeline 4 Teleconferences on 2015.4.29, 5.27,6.24,7.29 – Composed the draft SG 1 Phase 2 Report 2nd F2F meeting in Montreal, 2015,9.2-9.4 – discussed the draft SG 1 Phase 2 Report – discussed the recommendations to JTC 1 – discussed the 3 NWIPs, which contents be consistent with SG 1 report Teleconference to approve the SG 1 Phase 2 Report for submission to JTC1, 2015.9.15

9. SG 1 F2F meetings

10. The overview of SG 1 Phase 2 Report Business Process Knowledge Management Engineering Ch5 SmC Models (Framework) 3 potential NWIPs for new IS Upper Level Ontology for SmC Ch6 Need for good practice guidelines for SmC leaders Ch7 SmC ICT indicators Ch8 State of play of SmC in other SDOs Ch11 identify Recommendations to JTC 1 Ch12 Gap, Liaisons Refer to SG 1 N0157,N0158 ICT standardization requirements for cybersecurity and privacy Ch9 Value of requirements for standardized risk assessment methodologies Ch10 3 potential TRs

11. Chpt 5. Smart city ICT Framework Roles or Actors: CIO – Chief Information Officer CKO – Chief Knowledge Officer Chief Engineer P = Primary actor developing the content. R = Actor Reviews the content. S = Actor Supports development of the content. CIOCKO Chief Engineer Smart City Business Process Framework PSS Smart City Knowledge Management Framework RPS Smart City Engineering Framework RRP

12. Chpt 5. Smart city ICT Framework SmC Business Process View e.g. A general process interaction diagram from eTOM– for a scenario based around DSL fulfilment SmC Knowledge Management View e.g. From PAS 182 SmC Engineering View e.g. Smart Cities Solution Concept Diagram

13. Chpt 5. Smart city ICT Framework SmC Business Process View e.g. A general process interaction diagram from TMForum eTOM for a scenario based around DSL fulfilment

14. Chpt 5. Smart city ICT Framework SmC Knowledge Management View e.g. From PAS 182

15. Chpt 5. Smart city ICT Framework SmC Engineering View e.g. Smart Cities Solution Concept Diagram

16. Chpt 5. Smart city ICT Framework SDOs relevant to the Engineering View

17. Chpt 6. An upper level ontology for Smart Cities Identifies and develops standards for common/shared cross-city services Develops a Guidance Document for cities on existing standards and protocols relevant to the development of common and shared capabilities for Smart Cities Smart City Concept Model (BSI 182) e.g:City Conceptual Model (BSI 182)

18. Chpt 6. An upper level ontology for Smart Cities Potential program of work based on the Upper Level Ontology

19. Chpt 7. Need for good practice guidelines for smart city leaders and practitioners The role of ICT in Enabling citizen-centric services, including taking account of accessibility issues Adding location and other city-specific contexts to existing services Ensuring ICT service resilience in the face of environmental events such as storms The development and maintenance of interoperable spatial models of the city including its fixed and dynamic resources The implications for ICT Governance regarding the delivery of blended public/private/community services and data. Enabling and leveraging innovative and potentially disruptive technologies Existing Standard on ICT Governance ISO/IEC 38500:2015 Governance of IT for the organization

20. Chpt 8. Smart City ICT-related indicators Develop a set of ICT related indicators for smart cities in collaboration with ISO/TC 268. Related work ISO/TC 268 IEC/SEG1 (maybe converted to SyC Electrotechnical aspects of smart cities) ITU-T/FG-SSC (has been converted to SG 20) Chinese Smart City ICT Evaluation Model and Indicators

21. Chpt 9. ICT standardization requirements for cybersecurity and privacy Provide TRs on: Managing cybersecurity in a smart city Managing personal data in a smart city Relative work ITU-T released a Technical Report on the security of a smart city; the title is ‘fg-ssc- 0090r3-Technical Report on ICT Infrastructure for Cyber Security, Data Protection and Cyber Resilience in smart, sustainable cities’. Contributions from China are N0010, N0045 and N0083 relating to information security in the smart city ISO/IEC 27002 Code of practice for information security management ISO/IEC 29100:2011 Privacy framework ISO/IEC 29101:2013 Privacy architecture framework ISO/IEC 1st CD 29134 Privacy impact assessment —Guidelines ISO/IEC FDIS29190 Privacy capability assessment model SC27 NWIP on “Privacy enhancing data de-identification techniques”, under CD ballot (N15297).

22. Chpt 10. Value of requirements for standardized risk assessment methodologies Provide TR on: analysing the current situation of automated risk assessments in highly complex systems and their relevance to smart cities Relative work ISO Guide 73: Risk Management – Vocabulary, defines Risk as follows. ISO 31000 Risk management — Principles and guidelines plus ISO Guide 73:2009, Risk management — Vocabulary and ISO/IEC 31010, Risk management — Risk assessment techniques. ISO/IEC 27002 Code of practice for information security management IEC 61882:2001 - the international standard for HAZOPISO/IEC 29101:2013 Privacy architecture framework SC 27 – software engineering / IT security ISO 31000 and 31010 ISO/TC268 SG1, WG2

23. The overview of SG 1 Phase 2 Report Business Process Knowledge Management Engineering Ch5 SmC Models (Framework) 3 potential NWIPs for new IS Upper Level Ontology for SmC Ch6 Need for good practice guidelines for SmC leaders Ch7 SmC ICT indicators Ch8 State of play of SmC in other SDOs Ch11 identify Recommendations to JTC 1 Ch12 Gap, Liaisons Refer to SG 1 N0157,N0158 ICT standardization requirements for cybersecurity and privacy Ch9 Value of requirements for standardized risk assessment methodologies Ch10 3 potential TRs

24. JTC 1, Oct 2015 – Resolution 15 – Establishment of JTC 1/WG 11 on Smart Cities Contingent upon approval of a relevant NWIP, JTC 1 establishes JTC 1 WG11 on Smart Cities reporting directly to JTC 1 with the following terms of reference: 1.Serve as the focus of and proponent for JTC 1's Smart Cities standardization program. 2.Develop foundational standards for the use of ICT in Smart Cities - including the Smart City ICT Reference Framework and an Upper Level Ontology for Smart Cities - for guiding Smart Cities efforts throughout JTC 1 upon which other standards can be developed. 3.Develop a set of ICT related indicators for Smart Cities in collaboration with ISO/TC 268. 4.Develop additional Smart Cities’ standards and other deliverables that build on these foundational standards. 5.Identify JTC 1 (and other organization) subgroups that are developing standards and related material that contribute to Smart Cities, and where appropriate, investigate ongoing and potential new work that contributes to Smart Cities. 6.Develop and maintain liaisons with all relevant JTC 1 subgroups. 7.Engage with the community outside of JTC 1 to grow the awareness of, and encourage engagement in, JTC 1 Smart Cities standardization efforts within JTC 1, forming liaisons as is needed. 8.Ensure a strong relationship with Smart Cities activities in ISO and IEC Resolution 15 Page 1 of 2

25. JTC 1, Oct 2015 – Resolution 15 – Establishment of JTC 1/WG 11 on Smart Cities JTC 1 appoints Yuan Yuan to serve as the Convenor of the JTC 1 Working Group on Smart Cities. Tangli Liu will serve as Secretary. JTC 1 instructs WG 11 to review its Terms of Reference with respect to Systems Integration activities; JTC 1 Abu Dhabi resolutions 28 and 30 should be used as reference. JTC 1 instructs the WG 11 Convenor to work with ITTF to establish an eCommittee folder for WG 11 and to issue a call for National Bodies to register experts in the Global Directory for WG 11. Finally, JTC 1 thanks ITTF for their offer to edit and publish document JTC 1 N12790, the report of the SG on Smart Cities (without the included recommendations), as a stand-alone public document posted to the JTC 1 web site home page. Resolution 15 Page 2 of 2

26. Activities since the JTC 1 Plenary NWIPs currently in ballot to close on Feb 21st – N12881 Proposal for a New Work Item on Smart City ICT Indicators – N12880 Proposal for a New Work Item on Smart City ICT Reference Framework Planning a JTC 1/WG 11 meeting for May – Location TBD

27. Thank you yuanyuan@cesi.cn liutl@cesi.cn George Percivall gpercivall@opengeospatial.org